Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Kinetic Velocity distribution correction

For steady flow in a pipe or tube the kinetic energy term can be written as m2/(2 a) where u is the volumetric average velocity in the pipe or tube and a is a dimensionless correction factor which accounts for the velocity distribution across the pipe or tube. Fluids that are treated as compressible are almost always in turbulent flow and a is approximately 1 for turbulent flow. Thus for a compressible fluid flowing in a pipe or tube, equation 6.4 can be written as... [Pg.190]

Van der Waals acknowledges the profound influence of Clausius 1857 paper on the kinetic theory of heat, which provided the first correct proof of Maxwell s velocity distribution law and led to the... [Pg.38]

Chapter 7 covers the kinetic theory of gases. Diffusion and the one-dimensional velocity distribution were moved to Chapter 4 the ideal gas law is used throughout the book. This chapter covers more complex material. I have placed this material later in this edition, because any reasonable derivation of PV = nRT or the three-dimensional speed distribution really requires the students to understand a good deal of freshman physics. There is also significant coverage of dimensional analysis determining the correct functional form for the diffusion constant, for example. [Pg.225]

It was noted that the velocity in a channel approaching a weir might be so badly distributed as to require a value of 1.3 to 2.2 for the kinetic energy correction factor. In unobstructed uniform channels, however, the velocity distribution not only is more uniform but is readily amenable to theoretical analysis. Vanonil has demonstrated that the Prandtl universal logarithmic velocity distribution law for pipes also applies to a two-dimensional open channel, i.e., one that is infinitely wide. This equation may be written... [Pg.476]

Optical properties of metal nanoparticles embedded in dielectric media can be derived from the electrodynamic calculations within solid state theory. A simple model of electrons in metals, based on the gas kinetic theory, was presented by Drude in 1900 [9]. It assumes independent and free electrons with a common relaxation time. The theory was further corrected by Sommerfeld [10], who incorporated corrections originating from the Pauli exclusion principle (Fermi-Dirac velocity distribution). This so-called free-electron model was later modified to include minor corrections from the band structure of matter (effective mass) and termed quasi-free-electron model. Within this simple model electrons in metals are described as... [Pg.80]

AVERAGE VELOCITY, KINETIC-ENERGY FACTOR, AND MOMENTUM CORRECTION FACTOR FOR LAMINAR FLOW OF NEWTONIAN FLUIDS. Exact formulas for the average velocity V, the kinetic-energy correction factor a, and the momentum correction factor P are readily calculated from the defining equations in Chap. 4 and the velocity distribution shown in Eq. (5.11). [Pg.87]

Values of the momentum and kinetic-energy correction factors depend on the details of the velocity distribution for a particular flow. For flow in circular pipes the following values are obtained ... [Pg.191]

Velocity measurements made in a trapezoidal canal, reported by O Brien, yield the distribution contours, with the accompanying values of the correction factors for kinetic energy and momentum. The filament of maximum velocity is seen to lie beneath the surface, and the correction factors for kinetic energy and momentum are greater than in the corresponding case of pipe flow. Despite the added importance of these factors, however, the treatment in this section will follow the earlier procedure of assuming the values of a and p to be unity, unless stated otherwise. Any thoroughgoing analysis would, of course, have to take account of their true values. [Pg.477]

The leading correction to zero-velocity, zero-temperature kinetic friction of the form (7 Inas described in Eq. (28) apparently also applies to more comphcated elastic manifolds. Charitat and Joanny [97] investigated a polymer that was dragged over a surface containing sparsely distributed, trapping sites. They analyzed the competition between the soft elastic, intramolecular interactions, thermal noise, and the tendency of some monomers in the chain... [Pg.217]

To understand heat conduction, diffusion, viscosity and chemical kinetics the mechanistic view of molecule motion is of fundamental importance. The fundamental quantity is the mean-free path, i. e. the distance of a molecule between two collisions with any other molecule. The number of collisions between a molecule and a wall was shown in Chapter 4.1.1.2 to be z = CNQvdtl6. Similarly, we can calculate the number of collisions between molecules from a geometric view. We denote that all molecules have the mean speed v and their mean relative speed with respect to the colliding molecule is g. When two molecules collide, the distance between their centers is d in the case of identical molecules, d corresponds to the effective diameter of the molecule. Hence, this molecule will collide in the time dt with any molecule centre that lies in a cylinder of a diameter 2d with the area Jid and length gdt (it follows that the volume is Jtd gdt). The area where d is the molecule (particle) diameter is also called collisional cross section a. This is a measure of the area (centered on the centre of the mass of one of the particles) through which the particles cannot pass each other without colliding. Hence, the number of collisions is z = c n gdt. A more correct derivation, taking into account the motion of all other molecules with a Maxwell distribution (see below), leads to the same expression for z but with a factor of V2. We have to consider the relative speed, which is the vector difference between the velocities of two objects A and B (here for A relative to B) ... [Pg.352]

A more accurate treatment shows that expression (44) for should be divided by a factor 1 + 47iNo(A + Dj)Rii/1000/c where k is the velocity constant (in dm mol"ls l) which would be observed if the equilibrium spatial distribution of the reactants were not disturbed by the reaction. However, this correction is a small one, and since the whole treatment is approximate it is usually omitted. It should be mentioned that the diffusion model also gives a value for the rate of dissociation of the encounter complex since the equilibrium constant between two species and their encounter complex cannot be affected by rates of diffusion, the first-order rate constant for dissociation must also contain diffusion constants, and in our present nomenclature is given by 3/R ) D- + Df For a critical account of diffusion control in reactions in solution, see R. M. Noyes, Progr. Reaction Kinetics,... [Pg.125]


See other pages where Kinetic Velocity distribution correction is mentioned: [Pg.46]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.2324]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.1405]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.1716]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.336]   


SEARCH



Distribution kinetics

Velocity distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info