Judgmental random

There are defect limits that are associated with random failure modes. For example, if there is a leak from a mechanical seal on a pump, where do we decide that the leakage is excessive and requires immediate maintenance Vibration analysis severity levels are also typical examples of when do we have severe enough conditions to warrant equipment shutdown and overhaul. In such circumstances, the defect limit is dependent upon individual subjective judgment. 

Of the various methods of data presentation, the one with which starting analysts may be least familiar is trend analysis and statistical quality control. In an industrial environment, analysis is often centered around the production of batches of material. The properties of those batches may change over time due to random effects or to subtle changes in the production process. In either case, the quality of the product may change. Analysis is used to track the change in the properties of batches over time. Industrial analytical methods, therefore, need to be extremely rugged. Millions of dollars may depend on the analyst s judgment as to batch equivalence. 

The underlying spirit of this chapter is to show the existence of a wide spectrum of companies that make available innovative technology, knowledge, and a deep expertise in a given area. What the reader will see is only a sample of the availability and variety of sources. Awareness is placed in the fact that companies have been chosen randomly and there is no qualifying judgment behind their consideration here. 

The weight of the arguments favors the notion that for consent to be fully informed, subjects must be notified that their treatments will be allocated in a random manner, that is, selected by a process other than the judgment of their own... 

A few days later, the infantry colonel s scoring of the military tasks arrived in the mail. He had been required to rate them blind, because there were deliberately no time stamps on them and Lloyd had re-recorded them in random sequence. Nevertheless, the colonel s judgment of military competence in each scene conformed closely to the corresponding NF score. The Edgewood cognitive tests once again proved to be good predictors of performance in the field. 

Each QAU may exercise reasonable flexibihty and judgment to estabhsh an inspection schedule that it beheves is adequate to assure the integrity of the study. The FDA has indicated, however, that every study must be inspected in process at least once. Additional inspections may be randomly scheduled in such a way that over a series of studies each phase for each t5q)e of study is inspected. Any random sampling approach to inspections should be statistically based and should be described and justified in the QAU s SOPs. 

We have provided a summary of the results from double-blind, random-assignment studies (usually class I or II designs) comparing HCAs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), other new antidepressants, and MAOIs with placebo or with each other for the acute treatment of depression. Each study was reviewed, and a global judgment made, based on all the evidence presented, as to whether a given drug was more effective than placebo or another control therapy. 

Realizing that the decisions of accident victims to litigate and of litigants to settle are not random yields several insights. First, few litigated cases involve facts that lie far from the decision standards that courts use to render judgments. Plaintiffs and defendants make errors about the relationship between the facts of their particular cases and the rules used by courts to separate successful from unsuccessful torts, but large errors are uncommon (Priest and Klein 1984 Priest 1985, 220). 

Measurements also commonly involve random errors. These are errors whose size and direction differ from measurement to measurement that is, they are unpredictable and unreproducible. They are commonly associated with the limited sensitivity of instruments, the quality of the scales being read, the degree of control over the environment (temperature, vibration, humidity, and so on), or human frailties (limitations of eyesight, hearing, judgment, and so on). We shall say much more about random error later in this chapter. 

Unlike many dosage form specifications, the sterility specification is an absolute value. A product is either sterile or nonsterile. Historically, judgment of sterility has relied on an official compendial sterility test however, end-product sterility testing suffers from a myriad of limitations [1-4], The most obvious limitation is the nature of the sterility test. It is a destructive test thus, it depends on the statistical selection of a random sample of the whole lot. Uncertainty will always exist as to whether or not the sample unequivocally represents the whole. If it were known that one unit out of 1000 units was contaminated (i.e., contamination rate = 0.1%) and 20 units were randomly sampled out of those 1000 units, the probability of that one contaminated unit being included in those 20 samples is 0.02 [5], In other words, the chances are only 2% that the contaminated unit would be selected as part of the 20 representative samples of the whole 1000-unit lot. 

We might use the median (60) as the best estimate of future yields, since the median does not weight the lowest value unduly. On the other hand, we were able to obtain 63% yield 4 times out of 11. Perhaps this value (the mode) is the best estimate of future operation at carefully controlled conditions. Obviously, statistics cannot make the judgments required in this example. If we can say that the sample mean (58.4) is the best estimate of the population under certain conditions, providing the data come from a random sample of the population. If the 32% yield is as likely to occur as any other value, then the mean is the best estimate. 

Contrary to probabilistic sampling, judgmental sampling is intentionally non-random and even biased. Data obtained through judgmental sampling cannot be statistically evaluated. 

Combinations of any two are also used. The judgmental sampling pattern requires the smallest number of samples but the relative bias is the largest the opposite holds for the random pattern, where the bias is the smallest but the number of samples is the largest. In scientific studies it is the judgmental approach that is most often applied, whereas for legal purposes absolutely random sampling is often needed. 

This presentation provides an overview of sampling methods and tools suitable to address most site characterizations. The basic sampling types discussed are the systematic, random, and judgmental sampling approaches. 

Frequently, judgment combined with systematic or random sampling is used to take the advantages from each (Fig. 2.6). Table 2.1 summarizes the advantages and... 

---