Ionic bond directionality

How much can we bend this bond Well, the electrons of each ion occupy complicated three-dimensional regions (or orbitals ) around the nuclei. But at an approximate level we can assume the ions to be spherical, and there is then considerable freedom in the way we pack the ions round each other. The ionic bond therefore lacks directionality, although in packing ions of opposite sign, it is obviously necessary to make sure that the total charge (+ and -) adds up to zero, and that positive ions (which repel each other) are always separated by negative ions. 

The directionality in the bonding between a d-block metal ion and attached groups such as ammonia or chloride can now be understood in terms of the directional quality of the d orbitals. In 1929, Bethe described the crystal field theory (CFT) model to account for the spectroscopic properties of transition metal ions in crystals. Later, in the 1950s, this theory formed the basis of a widely used bonding model for molecular transition metal compounds. The CFT ionic bonding model has since been superseded by ligand field theory (LFT) and the molecular orbital (MO) theory, which make allowance for covalency in the bonding to the metal ion. However, CFT is still widely used as it provides a simple conceptual model which explains many of the properties of transition metal ions. 

When an electron orbital undergoes polarization, the electron cloud can get distorted in such a way that the electrons become concentrated on one side of the atom. This kind of distortion deforms the orbital and makes it sharper at one end, thus giving the orbital some directionality. When this occurs, a covalent bond is likely to form. Figure 8-2 illustrates the difference between an ideal ionic bonding pair (with equally polarized orbitals) and a bonding pair with polarization great enough to result in a covalent bond instead of an ionic bond. 

Since the covalent bond is directional, while the ionic bond is not, the degree of directionality changes with bond character. Such changes can have a marked influence on crystal structure. Both ionic and covalent bonds can be very strong, but since covalent bonds are directional, covalent materials respond differently to deformation. The fraction of covalent character can thus influence the mechanical properties of the ceramic. 

The realization of a certain crystal structure can be related to several factors geometric, electronic, electrochemical and chemical bonds, which, in limiting cases, correspond to ionic, covalent or metallic-type bonds. Only in a few cases, when one of these types of bonds is enhanced, is it possible to explain the composition and the crystal structure of a given compound, e.g. for phases with p valent ionic character or for covalent compounds where the bond directionality must be fulfilled by the structure. 

Table 2 presents effective ionic radii for many metal ions. For any metal ion, the radius increases with coordination number since the greater number of bonds weakens the strength of any one bond. The radius of the most common coordination number is underlined in Table 2. The alkali and alkaline earth metal ions exhibit variable coordination numbers without strong directionality in bonding. Because they are of similar size, Ca + and Na+ of differing charges...

With regard to the formation of ionic compounds, it is not too relevant whether the 8p or 7d shell is occupied in the neutral atom, as studied in extenso by Mann and Wdber (50). Instead, the significant question for more ionic compounds is whether in the ions, after all outer s, p and d electrons are removed, some g or f electrons will be in frontier orbitals or whether they might be easily excited to an outer electron shell so that they can be removed as well. Prince and Waber (103) showed that even in the divalent state of element 126 one g electron has changed to an / electronic state. However, the 8s electrons are not the first to be removed. Thus, the divalent ions will be expected to act as soft Lewis acids and possibly form covalent complex ions readily. Crystal or ligand fields influence the nature of the hybridization. Details such as directionality of bonds... 

A case in point for the ionic tautomer comes from kinetics studies of supramol-ecules 10 and 11 (see Table 17.4). Both compounds juxtapose a modified [Ru(bpy)3]2+, De, and a 3,5-dinitrobenzene, Ae, between amidinium-carboxylate and carboxylate-amidinium hydrogen bonding interfaces [126,127]. The geometry of each of the assemblies was constant, affording a pair of model compounds that directly probe the effect of interface directionality on PCET kinetics. Since PCET... 

One of the major attributes of ceramics is that as a class of materials, they are less dense than metals and hence are attractive when specific (i.e., per unit mass) properties are important. The main factors that determine density are, first, the masses of the atoms that make up the solid. Clearly, the heavier the atomic mass, the denser the solid, which is why NiO, for example, is denser than NaCl. The second factor relates to the nature of the bonding and its directionality. Covalently bonded ceramics are more open" structures and tend to be less dense, whereas the near-close-packed ionic structures, such as NaCl, tend to be denser. For example, MgO and SiC have very similar molecular weights ( 40 g) but the density of SiC is less than that of MgO (see Worked Example 3.4, and Table 4.3). 

The model of sphere packing requires no definition as to the nature of the bonding holding the spheres together, and in fact it requires that no directionality be exhibited in the bonding. This model does not work well when applied to structures built up of covalently bonded organic molecules, but it does work reasonably well for the crystals formed by ionic or metallic solids. 

The supramolecular approach would not be complete without the materials based on hydrogen bonds. Among intermolecular interactions, the latter is characterized by its directionality and moderate strength (Table 2.1). It is very interesting to clarify whether the light-driven mass transport demonstrated for ionic complexes of azobenzene is as well effective in the H-bonded supramolecular materials. 

Molecular crystal engineering is the bottom-up construction of functional materials, starting from molecular or ionic building blocks assembled by means of noncovalent interactions. The hydrogen bond (MB) is the interaction of choice, because it combines strength and directionality. These properties guarantee materials cohesion and stability as well as reproducibility of crystal-directed syntheses. 

---