Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ion interaction in solution

It was appreciated very early on that in systems of oppositely charged ions in solution, independent movement of ions could not be expected except under the extreme condition of infinite dilution. Therefore, independent contribution to bulk properties such as conductance or osmotic pressure cannot occur. Electrostatics demands that considerable attractive and repulsive forces be exerted between unlike and like charges respectively. In such interactions lies, to a very large extent, the demonstrable non-ideal behaviour of electrolyte solutions. [Pg.2]

Debye and Hiickel rationalized the way in which the conductances of strong electrolyte solutions were observed to vary with their concentration by proposing models of the ion distribution and applying to them well-established relationships of thermodynamics and electrostatics. The concept of ion atmospheres, formed by the preferential distribution of ions about a given central ion carrying charge of opposite sign, when developed in this way, provided experimentally verifiable expressions for the mean ion activity coefficients of electrolytes. These expressions make possible the determination of thermodynamic equihbrium constants in electrolyte systems and the interpretation of ionic reaction rates in solution. [Pg.2]


Silica Polymei Metal Ion Interactions in Solution. The reaction of metal ions with polymeric sihcate species in solution may be viewed as an ion-exchange process. Consequently, it might be expected that sihcate species acting as ligands would exhibit a range of reactivities toward cations in solution (59). Sihca gel forms complexes with multivalent metal ions in a manner that indicates a correlation between the ligand properties of the surface Si-OH groups and metal ion hydrolysis (60,61). For Cu +, Fe +, Cd +, and Pb +,... [Pg.6]

In this section we discuss ion-ion interaction in solution. For this discussion we need to introduce the dielectric constant of water and basic models for interpretation of the dielectric constant. [Pg.12]

With the ionic cloud on the electrode, the resemblance of the Gouy—Chapman model to that of the theoiy of ion-ion interactions in solution reviewed in Chapter 3 is evident. There, it was necessary to arbitrarily choose one ion and spotlight it as the central ion, or source, of the field. Here, the discussion resolves on ion-electrode interactions with the electrode as the source of the field. The response of an ion, however, does not depend on how the electric field is produced (i.e., whether the source is a central ion or a charged electrode). It depends only on the value of the field at the location of the ion. Hence, the electrostatic arguments in the problems of ion-ion interactions and ion-electrode interactions must be similar. [Pg.160]

Relaxation experiments with the temperature jump method (18) give valuable information about the kinetics of nucleotidepolyphosphate and metal ion interaction in solution (20). Differences of kinetic dissociation or association constants of such metal complexes are helping to reveal some biochemical specificities of certain metal ions in metal-nucleotide complexes. [Pg.45]

The adsorption of alkali Ions (and of earth alkali ions, not shown) differs from that of the anions SO and HPO In that the latter adsorb specifically on uncharged silver Iodide, with the concomitant change In p.z.c. (sec. 3.8. fig. 3.23 -25), whereas the former do not shift the p.z.c. For alkali ions, specificity starts only when there Is already 1 on the surface. This Is an example of specific adsorption of the second kind, as defined in sec. 3.6d. Apparently, the alkali Ions only adsorb on 1 sites, so that there will be some analogy with water structure-originating alkali lon-iodlde Ion interaction In solution. We will come back to this in sec. 3.10g. [Pg.376]

Similar observations, regarding the adsorption sequences of cations and anions, have also been made for other oxides (a-Fe203, ZnO) and have led to a description of such oxide surfaces as structure promoting This representation constitutes an extension of the Gurney s interpretation of ion-ion interactions in solution to the ion-surface interactions. [Pg.13]

Most water-soluble metal complexes, unlike typical organic reactants, are cations or anions and are therefore subject to Coulombic ion-ion interactions in solution. In essence, these are of two kinds the Debye-Hiickel or ionic atmosphere type, which affects the activity coefficients of the complex ion and hence the kinetics of its reactions, and ion association—usually considered simply as anion-cation pair formation.29 For cationic substrates in particular, pairing with an anionic incoming ligand may give an illusion of bimolecularity (an SN2 mechanism) when in fact the reaction may be dissociatively activated within the ion pair or encounter complex . [Pg.343]

Quite curiously, no studies have been reported on the effect of the Fc/Fc couple on the binding of the most common and otherwise most widely investigated cation H. In this connection, we wished to consider possible redox switching effects on the carboxylate/hydrogen ion interaction in solution. In particular, the acidic tendencies and the oxidation behaviour of the following ferrocenecarboxylic acids have been investigated through electrochemical techniques. [Pg.141]

Hydration (ion) The water molecules that are associated with ions in solution, typically charged headgroups and counterions that influence ion-ion interactions in solution, for example, ion size, ion pairing, and ease of dehydration. [Pg.3775]

Solvated ions interact in solution with other solutes, whether the latter are ions of the same charge sign (they repulse each other electrostatically), ions of the opposite sign (they attract each other), or non-ionic solutes. If the other solute is non-ionic, it may be non-polar (ions salt such solutes out) or polar (where several kinds of interaction may take place). In some cases, such interactions may cause changes in the solvation structure and dynamics of the ions in question, and such issues are dealt with in this chapter. [Pg.219]

The next problem then is how do ions interact in solution Friedman and Krishnan (1973) differentiate between three types of models. There is brass-balIs-in-the-bathtub-model, where the ions are taken to be hard spheres in the bathtub (solvent) then there are the chemical and the Hamiltonian models, which start from fairly rigorous statistical mechanics and calculate the interaction of ions in solution. [Pg.104]

Owing to the size of the subject, it has proved necessary in the following chapters, to be selective in the choice of material presented. Earlier chapters are concerned with ionics and its applications. Here are considered ion interactions in solution, acid-base equilibria, transport phenomena, and the concept of reversible electrode potential. This last named leads to the development of reversible cells and their exploitation. Here one is dealing with electrochemical thermodynamics - with the rapid attainment of equilibrium between species at an electrode surface and charged species in solution. [Pg.5]

This interface is critically important in many applications, as well as in biological systems. For example, the movement of pollutants tln-ough the enviromnent involves a series of chemical reactions of aqueous groundwater solutions with mineral surfaces. Although the liquid-solid interface has been studied for many years, it is only recently that the tools have been developed for interrogating this interface at the atomic level. This interface is particularly complex, as the interactions of ions dissolved in solution with a surface are affected not only by the surface structure, but also by the solution chemistry and by the effects of the electrical double layer [31]. It has been found, for example, that some surface reconstructions present in UHV persist under solution, while others do not. [Pg.314]

Spectroscopic studies of ion-ion-solvent interaction in solutions containing oxyanions. D. W. [Pg.66]

It should be noted again that ISEs sense the activity, rather than the concentration of ions in solution. The term activity is used to denote the effective (active) concentration of the ion. The difference between concentration and activity arises because of ionic interactions (with oppositely charged ions) that reduce the effective concentration of the ion. The activity of an ion i in solution is related to its concentration, c by... [Pg.143]

Solid Bi2S3 does not appear in the expression for K,p, because it is a pure solid and its activity is 1 (Section 9.2). A solubility product is used in the same way as any other equilibrium constant. However, because ion-ion interactions in even dilute electrolyte solutions can complicate its interpretation, a solubility product is generally meaningful only for sparingly soluble salts. Another complication that arises when dealing with nearly insoluble compounds is that dissociation of the ions is rarely complete, and a saturated solution of Pbl2, for instance, contains substantial... [Pg.586]

The possibility of ion formation during the interaction between two Lewis acid molecules as shown in the scheme above is important for the initiation of cationic polymerizations in the absence of cation forming additives (e.g. HX or RX)1). When aluminum-halides A1X3 (X = Cl, Br) are concerned, the ion formation in solution could be experimentally proven163). The formation of ionic species in pure SbCl5/ SbFj system has already been pointed out. [Pg.228]

The approach introduced by E. A. Guggenheim and employed by H. S. Harned, G. Akerlof, and other authors, especially for a mixture of two electrolytes, is based on the Br0nsted assumption of specific ion interactions in a dilute solution of two electrolytes with constant overall concentration, the interaction between ions with charges of the same sign is non-specific for the type of ion, while interaction between ions with opposite charges is specific. [Pg.53]

Electroless Ni-Ge-P was studied as a model system for ternary alloy deposition [112], A chloride-free solution with GeC>2 as a source of Ge, hypophosphite as reducing agent, aspartic acid as a selective complexant for Ni2+ ions, which was operated at 80 °C in the pH range of 5-5.8, was developed for depositing Ni-Ge-P films with a tunable Ge content from 0 to 25+ at%. The use of a complexant such as citric acid, which complexed Ge(IY) ions as well as Ni2+ ions, resulted in a much lower Ge content in the electroless deposit, and a more complicated solution to study for the reasons discussed above. The aspartate-containing electroless solution, with its non-complexing pH buffer (succinic acid), approximated a modular system, and, with the exception of the aspartic acid - Ni2+ complexation reaction, exhibited a minimum level of interactions in solution. [Pg.257]

The interactions between the ions originally in solution and any added LiCl are best treated within the context of the Debye-Elttckel theory, which derives from a knowledge of electrostatic considerations. [Pg.313]

C. Chemical Interactions in Solution. The rather dramatic effect of trace metal ions and additives on electrodeposition was reviewed briefly in the previous sections for copper and zinc. [Pg.711]

The electrostatic description of ion formation in solution is satisfactory as long as ionic compounds are dissolved in a solvent 2 The energy required to dissolve an ionic compound is furnished by the interaction of the ions with the solvent molecules (Fig. 1) the ions are surrounded by a number of solvent molecules, and thus are solvated . [Pg.64]

Helgeson and Kirkham, 1974). In equations 8.32.1 and 8.32.2, p is solvent density, e is the dielectric constant of the solvent, and a, is the effective diameter of ion i in solution. The latter parameter must not be confused with the ionic diameter of the ion in a condensed aggregation state, but represents the range of electrostatic interaction with the solvent molecules (see section 8.11.3). [Pg.495]

According to Nernst s equation, there should be a linear relationship between the equilibrium potential of the metal/metal-ion electrode (M/M ) and the logarithm of the concentration of ions [Eq. (5.13)]. This linear relationship was observed experimentally for a low concentration of the solute MA (e.g., 0.01 mol/L and lower). For higher concentrations, a deviation from linearity was observed (see, e.g.. Fig. 5.12). The deviation from linearity is due to ion-ion interactions. In the example in Figure 5.12, the ion-ion interactions include interaction of the hydrated Ag ions with one... [Pg.70]

Semenova, M.G., Belyakova, L.E., Dickinson, E., Eliot-Laize, C., Polikarpov, Yu.N. (2005). Caseinate interactions in solution and in emulsions effect of temperature, pH and calcium ions. In Dickinson, E. (Ed.). Food Colloids Interactions, Microstructure and Processing, Cambridge, UK Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 209-217. [Pg.30]

For some solvent systems, it has not yet been possible to obtain structural information in the solid state. The ion-pair loosening ability of DMSO has been thoroughly illustrated in studies of M+-DMSO interactions in solution using several different techniques NMR 48,49 solution IR 50-52 conductometry53 and calorimetry.54 In the case of Na+, a coordination number of six has been confirmed. IR techniques have also been used to monitor alkali metal complexation with the related sulfoxides, diisopropyl and dibutyl sulfoxide.50 Solid M+-DMSO species have... [Pg.5]


See other pages where Ion interaction in solution is mentioned: [Pg.630]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.607]   


SEARCH



Solute ions

Solutions ions in solution

© 2024 chempedia.info