Internal model control system

Figure 4 illustrates the operation of an internal model control system (5) designed to use Pd as a manipulated variable to minimize the variance of the purity error APp while optimizing Y. As shown in the figure, the effect of the change in Pd at the time point k-1 is subtracted from the measured output variable (i.e., the purity error) at the time point k in order to determine an estimate of ADk, i.e.,... 

The development of "internal model control," a design technique that bridges traditional and robust techniques for designing control systems, has provided the framework for unifying and extending these advances. It is now available in commercially available design software. 

In theory, the internal model control methods discussed for SISO systems in Chap. 11 can be extended to multivariable systems (see the paper by Garcia and Morari in lEC Process Design and Development, Vol. 24, 1985, p. 472). 

Several process control design methods, such as the Generic Model Control (GMC) [41], the Globally Linearizing Control (GLC) [37], the Internal Decoupling Control (IDC) [7], the reference system synthesis [8], and the Nonlinear Internal Model Control (NIMC) [29], are based on input-output linearization. 

M.A. Henson and D.E. Seborg. An internal model control strategy for nonlinear systems. AIChE Journal, 37 1065-1081, 1991. 

Model predictive control was conceived for multivariable systems with changing objectives and constraints. In simpler situations, a PID controller tuned according to internal model control (IMC) principles [8] can deliver equal performance with much less effort. 

Keywords Freeze drying, moving boundary, non linear distributed parameter systems, model based predictive control, internal model control. 

It is therefore necessary to develop control-relevant techniques for characterizing nonlinearity. Through use of the Optimal Control Structure (OCS) approach [5], Stack and Doyle have shown that measures, such as Eq. (1), may still be applied but to a controlrelevant system structure. In the OCS approach, the necessary conditions for an optimal control trajectory given a process and performance objective are analyzed as an independent system. The nonlinearity of these equations determine the control-relevant nonlinearity. The OCS has been used to determine the control-relevance of certain commonly-exhibited nonlinear behaviors [6]. Using nonlinear internal model control (IMC) structures, similar analysis has been performed on Hammerstein and Wiener systems with polynomial nonlinearities to examine the role of performance objectives on the controlrelevant nonlinearity [7]. Though not applied to the examples in section 5, these controlrelevant analysis techniques have been shown to be beneficial and remain an active research area. 

Model-based techniques are recommended for control system design, especially the Internal Model Control and Direct Synthesis methods. 

When a cascade control system is tuned after installation, the secondary controller should be tuned first with the primary controller in the manual mode. Then the primary controller is transferred to automatic, and it is tuned. The relay auto-tuning technique presented in Chapter 12 can be used for each control loop. If the secondary controller is retuned for some reason, usually the primary controller must also be retuned. Alternatively, Lee et al. (1998) have developed a tuning method based on Direct Synthesis where both loops are tuned simultaneously. When there are limits on either controller (saturation constraints), Brosilow and Joseph (2002) have recommended design modifications based on the Internal Model Control (IMC) approach. 

Henson, M. A., and D. E. Seborg, An Internal Model Control Strategy for Nonlinear Systems, AIChE J., 37,1065 (1991). 

ABSTRACT In this paper the Internal Model Control (IMC) approach for marine autopilot system is presented. The inversion by feedback techniques are employed for reahzation of inversion such nonlinear characteristics as saturation of rudder angle and rudder rate. The extension of the model and inverse model to a nonlinear form enabled to achieve a significant improvement in the control performance. 

In the ship autopilot systems there are also adopted internal model control (IMC). The difference between the IMC and single-loop systems lies in better prediction capabilities of the IMC approach. 

Summary. In this chapter the control problem of output tracking with disturbance rejection of chemical reactors operating under forced oscillations subjected to load disturbances and parameter uncertainty is addressed. An error feedback nonlinear control law which relies on the existence of an internal model of the exosystem that generates all the possible steady state inputs for all the admissible values of the system parameters is proposed, to guarantee that the output tracking error is maintained within predefined bounds and ensures at the same time the stability of the closed-loop system. Key theoretical concepts and results are first reviewed with particular emphasis on the development of continuous and discrete control structures for the proposed robust regulator. The role of disturbances and model uncertainty is also discussed. Several numerical examples are presented to illustrate the results. 

M. Agarwal. Combining neural and conventional paradigms for modeling, prediction and control. International Journal of Systems Science, 28 65-81, 1997. 

Once a process model has been established, it is possible to build the inverse of that model, which can be used as a controller. A simple internal model-based controller (IMC) is the Smith-predictor (Figure 2.85b), which is a first-order system with dead time combined with a PI controller. 

The question of the most relevant (delocalized) conjugation pathway in porphyrins (75M18) sometimes still causes confusion. Thus, meso reactivity of porphyrins toward electrophiles is frontier orbital controlled. This (75M15) has been taken as evidence for Fleischer s model of an internally delocalized n-system, as shown in structure XVIII (84T2359). 

CAMSEQ/M provides the user with the capability to input complete molecular structures from the internal (disk) data base, to input cartesian or crystallographic coordinates, or to use a "joystick" controlled model-building system. In addition, a molecule may be constructed from one or more substructures with substituents attached using the joystick model-builder routines. Data input is therefore quite flexible, and the user is guided through every step by the program. 

---