Internal mixer advantages

TPEs from blends of rubber and plastics constitute an important category of TPEs. These can be prepared either by the melt mixing of plastics and rubbers in an internal mixer or by solvent casting from a suitable solvent. The commonly used plastics and rubbers include polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), nylon, ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber (EPDM), natural rubber (NR), butyl rubber, nitrile rubber, etc. TPEs from blends of rubbers and plastics have certain typical advantages over the other TPEs. In this case, the required properties can easily be achieved by the proper selection of rubbers and plastics and by the proper change in their ratios. The overall performance of the resultant TPEs can be improved by changing the phase structure and crystallinity of plastics and also by the proper incorporation of suitable fillers, crosslinkers, and interfacial agents. 

Figure 35.4 shows the concept of the internal mixer proposed by Banbury. It can be seen easily that the basic concept of the internal mixer did not change since almost 90 years. Obviously the advantage of the easily feeding is preferred above the rather poor between batch consistency. 

Table 35.4 contains all benefits and disadvantages of batch mixing with respect to continuous mixing. Table 35.5 contains basically the same for continuous mixing with respect to batch mixing. The major advantages of internal mixers are... 

Mechanical mixing of polymers carried out on either an open mill or in a Banbury internal mixer has advantages in efficiency, productivity, and lower cost. However, natural rubber in many instances must first undergo an initial breakdown. 

The undiluted silane is added directly to the polymer before or together with the filler. It is essential that the resin does not prematurely react with the silane as otherwise the coupling efficiency will be reduced. Typical compounding equipment consists of internal mixers, kneaders, Banbury mixers, two-roll mills, or extruders. The integral blend technique is widely used in resin/filler systems because of its great simplicity and possible cost advantages. This is mainly due to the one-step process and the lower raw material costs (untreated mineral plus silane compared to pretreated mineral) despite the fact that more silane is needed to achieve comparable performance in the finished composite. 

Continuous internal mixers are similar to batch internal mixers, but offer the advantage of continuous operation and high throughput. The resin and carbon black can be pre-blended or the ingredients can be fed separately, provided that accurate measuring and/or metering is employed. Pelleted carbon blacks are required for this type of equipment. 

Powdered rubber based on E-SBR/carbon black compoimded in an internal mixer process is examined with respect to the advantages it affords in terms of enviromnental, handling and efficiency over conventional bale technology. This paper is the first part of a series of publications which discusses the individual rabber/filler systems in detail, and focuses on the system of carbon black-filled emulsion styrene butadiene rubber. It covers the selection of the raw materials, manufacture of products and their characterisation. 18 refs. 

An overview of the mixing machinery cmrently available for the manufacture of silica compounds and the requirements for the design of an internal mixer for the production of these compotmds is presented. A comparison is made of different mixers and the replacement of a 270-litre tangential mixer with a250-litre intermeshing mixer to make use of the advantages of mtermeshing irrtemal rrrixers is demonstrated. 12 refs. (International Tyre Exhibition Conference, Akron, USA, Sept. 12-14, 2000). 

First, mixing of these materials may be very different from what has been described so far. For example, the internal mixer described here is primarily a tangential type. For many of the new materials an intermeshing type may offer an advantage. Also, use of a twin-screw and continuous mixing may be a preferred choice. 

Many passive microstructured mixers (see e.g. [2, 3]) follow design principles used at the macro-scale for static mixers with internal packings [4], It stands to reason that some of the advantages in processing claimed for conventional static mixer also apply or may be even more pronounced when using static mixers [4] ... 

---