Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfacial adhesion, effect

The interfacial adhesion effect of the HB PAMAMs on fibers in epoxy composite systems was investigated with laminates prepared by compression molding. [Pg.221]

Creton, C., Kramer, E.J., Hui, C.-Y. and Brown, H.R., Failure mechanisms of polymer interfaces reinforced with block copolymers. Macromolecules, 25, 3075-3088 (1992). Boucher et al., E., Effects of the formation of copolymer on the interfacial adhesion between semicrystalline polymers. Macromolecules, 29, 774-782 (1996). [Pg.241]

Elliot [38] has reported that interfacial adhesion in the NR-PP blend can be enhanced by the addition of small amounts of HOPE. Addition of HDPE does give some improvement in the notched Izod impact strength of NR-PP blend (Fig. 7). The effect of HDPE on the impact modification of NR-PP is associated with the improved crystallinity of PP, enhanced by HDPE. During the mill mixing of NR and PP, chain scission may occur to give polymeric radicals that, on reaction with... [Pg.643]

After this treatment the surface energy of the fibers is increased to a level much closer to the surface energy of the matrix. Thus, a better wettability and a higher interfacial adhesion are obtained. The polypropylene (PP) chain permits segmental crystallization and cohesive coupling between modified fiber and PP matrix [40]. The graft copolymerization method is effective, but complex. [Pg.797]

Figures 20.13 and 20.14 describe the effect of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) on the tensile strength and tensile modulus for the 25/75 LCP/PEN blend fibers at draw ratios of 10 and 20 [13]. As expected, the addition of DBTDL slightly enhances the mechanical properties of the blends up to ca. 500 ppm of DBTDL. The optimum quantity of DBTDL seems to be about 500 ppm at a draw ratio of 20. However, the mechanical properties deteriorate when the concentration of catalyst exceeds this optimum level. From the previous relationships between the rheological properties and the mechanical properties, it can be discerned that the interfacial adhesion and the compatibility between the two phases, PEN and LCP, were enhanced. Hence, DBTDL can be used as a catalyst to achieve reactive compatibility in this blend system. This suggests the possibility of improving the interfacial adhesion between the immiscible polymer blends containing the LCP by reactive extrusion processing with a very short residence time. Figures 20.13 and 20.14 describe the effect of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) on the tensile strength and tensile modulus for the 25/75 LCP/PEN blend fibers at draw ratios of 10 and 20 [13]. As expected, the addition of DBTDL slightly enhances the mechanical properties of the blends up to ca. 500 ppm of DBTDL. The optimum quantity of DBTDL seems to be about 500 ppm at a draw ratio of 20. However, the mechanical properties deteriorate when the concentration of catalyst exceeds this optimum level. From the previous relationships between the rheological properties and the mechanical properties, it can be discerned that the interfacial adhesion and the compatibility between the two phases, PEN and LCP, were enhanced. Hence, DBTDL can be used as a catalyst to achieve reactive compatibility in this blend system. This suggests the possibility of improving the interfacial adhesion between the immiscible polymer blends containing the LCP by reactive extrusion processing with a very short residence time.
Nardin, M. and Schultz, J. (1993). Effect of elastic moduli and interfacial adhesion energy on the critical fiber aspect ratio in single fiber composites. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 12, 1245-1247. [Pg.90]

The Teflon filler was obtained as a latex kindly supplied by the E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co. It had a much larger particle size than the fillers prepared in this laboratory, the latter having been designed to fall in the particle size range 400-600 A. However, it was still of interest to study the effect of the Teflon filler in view of the low rubber-filler interfacial adhesion that could be expected. [Pg.505]

In Secs. 13.2-13.3 the principles of toughening of thermosets by rubber particles, and the role of morphologies, interfacial adhesion, composition, and structural parameters on the toughening effect are analyzed. Section 13.4 is devoted to the use of initially miscible thermoplastics for toughening purposes. The effect of core-shell rubber particles is discussed in Sec. 13.5 and, in Sec. 13.6, miscellaneous ways of toughening thermosets (liquid crystals, hybrid composites, etc.), are analyzed. [Pg.401]

A threshold of interfacial adhesion between both phases is needed to (a) promote the cavitation mechanism and (b) activate the crack-bridging mechanism. For rubbery particles, the former contributes much more than the latter to the total fracture energy. Adhesion is achieved by the use of functionalized rubbers that become covalently bonded to the matrix. Higher toughness values have been reported by the use of functionalized rubbers (Kinloch, 1989 Huang et al., 1993b). However, these experimental results also reflect the effect of other changes (particle size distribution,... [Pg.411]

A threshold level of interfacial adhesion is also necessary to produce a triaxial tensile state around rubber particles as the result of the cure process. When the two-phase material is cooled from the cure temperature to room temperature, internal stresses around particles are generated due to the difference of thermal expansion coefficients of both phases. If particles cannot debond from the matrix, this stress field magnifies the effect produced upon mechanical loading. [Pg.412]

The thermoplastic resins are usually blended with the epoxy resin in a solvent solution. Early researchers realized that to make this approach effective, it was necessary to increase the compatibility and interfacial adhesion of the thermoplastic modifier and the epoxy resins. The problem of poor miscibility of the thermoplastic resins and poor processabihty of the final product are the main reasons that these materials have not achieved commercial success. [Pg.150]

Bonding of hydrophobic plastic materials to wood to create new wood-plastic (polystyrene) materials with improved mechanical and physical properties that incorporate the desirable features of each constituent is difficult to achieve. This is due to poor interfacial adhesion between the wood and polystyrene components because of their inherent incompatibility. New, well-defined, tailored cellulose-polystyrene graft copolymers have recently been prepared using anionic polymerization techniques. Preliminary bonding studies showed that these graft copolymers can function effectively as compatibi-lizers or interfacial agents to bond hydrophobic plastic (polystyrene) material to wood, evolving into a new class of composites. [Pg.334]


See other pages where Interfacial adhesion, effect is mentioned: [Pg.163]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.1878]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.1011]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.272]   


SEARCH



Interfacial adhesion

Interfacial adhesion, effect compatibilizing agent

Interfacial effective

Interfacial effects

© 2024 chempedia.info