Interface growth function

Equation 6.65 can be used to estimate the optimal interface orientation for a maximum in the interface growth function. Differentiation of that expression with respect to y, at y = 0, yields... 

Example 6.4. Interface Growth Function with Reorientation for Simple Shear Flow... 

Compare the interface growth function for the following cases (a) optimum initial orientation and one step shear strain, and (b) initial orientation ay = 45° and ax = 135°, N steps, and reorientation after each step. The total shear strain is 10. Consider 5 and 20 steps for case (b). 

For y = 10, the interface growth function is equal to 10.05 in case (a). For case (b), cos ay = — cos ax = 0.707 and the total shear strain is subdivided into N steps so that in every step the applied strain is y/N. Thus, the interface growth function at the end of step j is calculated from Eq. 6.65 as... 

At the end of that process the total interface growth function is... 

In Table 6.1 we summarize the values of the average (integrated over all possible orientations) and maximum interface growth function/(3/ or e) for planar and uniaxial elongation,... 

TABLE 6.1 Interface Growth Function for Various Types of Strain... 

A.9 Interfacial Growth in Simple Shear. A minor component, of volume fraction f, in the form of cubic pellets is mixed with the major component. Calculate the interface growth function for large shear strains. Furthermore, extend the calculations to the case of different shear viscosities of the minor and major components and of negligible interfacial tension between the components. 

The energy release rate (G) represents adherence and is attributed to a multiplicative combination of interfacial and bulk effects. The interface contributions to the overall adherence are captured by the adhesion energy (Go), which is assumed to be rate-independent and equal to the thermodynamic work of adhesion (IVa)-Additional dissipation occurring within the elastomer is contained in the bulk viscoelastic loss function 0, which is dependent on the crack growth velocity (v) and on temperature (T). The function 0 is therefore substrate surface independent, but test geometry dependent. 

Here r is the distance between the centers of two atoms in dimensionless units r = R/a, where R is the actual distance and a defines the effective range of the potential. Uq sets the energy scale of the pair-interaction. A number of crystal growth processes have been investigated by this type of potential, for example [28-31]. An alternative way of calculating solid-liquid interface structures on an atomic level is via classical density-functional methods [32,33]. 

With a finite value of A(i 0, the interface starts to move. In the mean-field approximation of a similar model, one can obtain the growth rate u as a function of the driving force Afi [49]. For Afi smaller than the critical value Afi the growth rate remains zero the system is metastable. Only above the critical threshold, the velocity increases a.s v and finally... 

Substitution of appropriate functions for nucleation and growth rates into eqn. (1) and integration yields the f(a)—time relation corresponding to a particular geometry of interface advance. In real systems, the reactant... 

For abrasion this is, however, a much more dominating process than for cut growth. The main reason is that the energy consumption in the abrasion process raises the temperature in the interface between rubber and track and thereby modifies this process. The temperature in the contact patch is a function of the power consumption and depends, therefore, also on the sliding speed. The temperature not only influences the oxidation and cut growth process, but also causes thermal degradation. 

Figure 12. Families of steady and time-dependent cellular interfaces for system II as a function of increzising growth rate P, es computed in a 2Ac sample size.

---