Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction Effects Again

Let us take another look at diffusional interaction effects with the help of Eqs. 7.1.9 and 7.1.10, rewritten for a ternary system as follows  [Pg.144]

in general, k 2, A 21, Axj, and X2 can take on any sign, depending on the physical constraints imposed on the system, we could encounter one of the three situations sketched below. [Pg.144]

Even when its constituent driving force Ax is zero, we could have a nonvanishing flux /i. [Pg.144]

Under a certain set of operating conditions and system properties the term k 2 Ax2 [Pg.144]

A diffusion barrier is considered to exist for component 1 (Toor, 1957). [Pg.144]


Second, as the number of factors increases, the chances also increase that one or more of them will not affect the response significantly, through main or interaction effects. Again, if the effects of these variables need not be determined, why perform all the experiments of a complete factorial ... [Pg.147]

Note that subscripts L and //refer to the two forms of the adsorbent molecule, while superscript H refers to the hard part of the interaction. Here, again, we do not expect a large solvent effect when the size of the ligand is small compared with the adsorbent molecule. There will be no effect when the ligand is buried in the interior of the adsorbent molecule. The low-density limit (p —> 0) is now... [Pg.302]

In a similar way, the classical interaction effects AB, AC, BC, and ABC can be defined as the difference in average response between the experiments carried out at the high level of the interaction and the experiments carried out at the low level of the interaction. Again, the high level of an interaction is indicated by a plus sign in its column in Table 14.3 (either both of the individual factors are at a high level, or both of the individual factors are at a low level). The low level of a two-factor interaction is indicated by a minus sign in its column in Table 14.3 (one but not both of the individual factors is at a low level). Thus, the classical two-factor interaction effects are easily calculated ... [Pg.325]

Since there is a non-negligible interaction between temperature (B) and time (C), the effects of these factors must be considered jointly. An interaction effect plot is a simple way to carry out this analysis. In Figure 2.3, the vertical axis represents, again, the response whereas the horizontal axis shows the levels of one of the factors involved in the interaction. For each of these levels we represent the mean response obtained at each combination of levels of the other factor. As presented in Figure 2.3, when time (C) is set at its low level, a change from the low to the high level of temperature (B) decreases the response (yield)... [Pg.59]

The rotational and Zeeman perturbation Hamiltonian (X) to the electronic eigenstates was given in equation (8.105). It did not, however, contain terms which describe the interaction effects arising from nuclear spin. These are of primary importance in molecular beam magnetic resonance studies, so we must now extend our treatment and, in particular, demonstrate the origin of the terms in the effective Hamiltonian already employed to analyse the spectra. Again the treatment will apply to any molecule, but we shall subsequently restrict attention to diatomic systems. [Pg.410]

The regression analysis, when the relationship between the process variables is given by a matrix, is frequently used to solve the problems of identification and confidence of the coefficients as well as the problem of a model confidence. The matrix expression is used frequently in processes with more than two independent variables which present simultaneous interactive effects with a dependent variable. In this case, the formulation of the problem is similar to the formulation described in the previous section. Thus, we will use the statistical data from Table 5.11 again in order to identify the coefficients with the following relation ... [Pg.366]

Interactions between nutraceuticals and prescribed medicines or even other nutraceuticals are being reported. Interactions between nutraceuticals and medicines include those experienced with melatonin, which was shown to exacerbate methamphetamine-induced neurochemical effects, again in animal studies policosanol has been shown to stimulate the antiulcer effects of... [Pg.2445]


See other pages where Interaction Effects Again is mentioned: [Pg.144]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.1046]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.73]   


SEARCH



Effective interaction

Effects interaction

Interactive effects

© 2024 chempedia.info