Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction between polymers

Consider that at low temperatures, a lubricant is a poor solvent for polymer chains. When the temperature increases, interactions between polymer chains decrease the space occupied by the polymer ball takes on greater volume and consequently, the viscosity decrease due to the lubricant temperature increase is compensated by the unfolding of the polymer chain and the result is a reduction of the difference between the viscosities at low and high temperature, and therefore an Increase in viscosity index. [Pg.355]

Polymethacrylates are less soluble than hydrocarbon polymers in mineral oils, they thicken less at low temperatures and are more effective at high temperatures. In this respect, it is important to note that the modification of rheoiogical properties is based on interactions between polymer and oil it will therefore be always dependent of the nature of oil. [Pg.356]

The depletion picture also applies to otlier systems, such as mixtures of colloidal particles. Flowever, whereas neglecting tire interactions between polymer molecules may be reasonable, tliis cannot be done in tire general case. [Pg.2680]

In addition to an array of experimental methods, we also consider a more diverse assortment of polymeric systems than has been true in other chapters. Besides synthetic polymer solutions, we also consider aqueous protein solutions. The former polymers are well represented by the random coil model the latter are approximated by rigid ellipsoids or spheres. For random coils changes in the goodness of the solvent affects coil dimensions. For aqueous proteins the solvent-solute interaction results in various degrees of hydration, which also changes the size of the molecules. Hence the methods we discuss are all potential sources of information about these interactions between polymers and their solvent environments. [Pg.583]

It has, however, been possible to find solvents for some polar crystalline polymers such as the nylons, poly(vinyl chloride) and the polycarbonates. This is because of specific interactions between polymer and solvent that may often occur, for instance by hydrogen bonding. [Pg.86]

All PVC plasticisers have a solubility parameter similar to that of PVC. It appears that differences between liquids in their plasticising behaviour is due to differences in the degree of interaction between polymer and plasticiser. Thus such phosphates as tritolyl phosphate, which have a high degree of interaction, gel rapidly with polymer, are more difficult to extract with solvents and give compounds with the highest brittle point. Liquids such as dioctyl adipate, with the lowest interaction with polymer, have the converse effect whilst the phthalates, which are intermediate in their degree of interaction, are the best allround materials. [Pg.330]

The solubility parameter is calculated at 20 MPa and therefore the polymer is swollen by liquids of similar cohesive forces. Since crystallisation is thermodynamically favoured even in the presence of liquids of similar solubility parameter and since there is little scope of specific interaction between polymer and liquid there are no effective solvents at room temperature for the homopolymer. [Pg.468]

For the GPC separation mechanism to strictly apply, there must be no adsorption of the polymer onto the stationary phase. Such adsorption would delay elution of the polymer, thereby resulting in the calculation of too low a molecular weight for the polymer. The considerable variety of undesirable interactions between polymers and column stationary phases has been well reviewed for GPC by Barth (1) and this useful reference is recommended to the reader. Thus, the primary requirement for ideal GPC is that the solvent-polymer interaction be strongly thermodynamically favored over the polymerstationary phase interaction. [Pg.541]

Two hydrophobized polymers, MA-DP-A20 (phenyl group grafted in 20 mol%) and MA-DP-H68 (hexyl group grafted in 68 mol%), were selected for the evaluation of the interaction between polymers and cell membranes... [Pg.180]

The in situ method using rat living intestine was simple and qualitative. However, it was difficult to evaluate the weak interaction between polymers and cell membranes quantitatively. Therefore, the lipid bilayer of liposome was used as a model of cell membranes for the quantitative evaluation for the affinity of the hydrophobized polymers (15). [Pg.181]

The structure of the chain, i.e., whether it is a helix or a random coil, might influence not only the rate but also the stereospecificity of the growing polymer. For example, it is plausible to expect that in normal vinyl polymerization helix formation might favor specific placement, say isotactic, while either placement would be approximately equally probable in a growing random coil. Formation of a helix requires interaction between polymer segments, and this intramolecular interaction is enhanced by bad solvents particularly those which precipitate the polymer. [Pg.172]

Like PEO-LiCl04, a 6 1 crystalline compound is formed but, in this instance, the weakened interactions between polymer chains [18] contributes to the lowest melting point for any PEO-salt crystalline complex. A eutectic with composition 0 Li = 11 1 forms, provided the PEO molecular chain length is beyond the entanglement threshold [31]. For lower molecular weights, the 6 1 compound dose not crystallize in the presence of excess PEO and a crystallinity gap exists over the range 6 l < 0 Li < 12 1 [26]. [Pg.504]

The importance of polydispersity is an interesting clue that it may be possible to tailor the weak interactions between polymer brushes by controlled polydispersity, that is, designed mixtures of molecular weight. A mixture of two chain lengths in a flat tethered layer can be analyzed via the Alexander model since the extra chain length in the longer chains, like free chains, will not penetrate the denser, shorter brush. This is one aspect of the vertical segregation phenomenon discussed in the next section. [Pg.60]

The interaction between polymer matrix and filler leads to the formation of a bound polymer in close proximity to the reinforcing filler, which restricts the solvent uptake [13]. The composites containing acetylated cellulose fillers exhibited higher uptake of toluene compared to water in accordance with their hydrophobic nature. [Pg.129]

Fig. 114.—(a) Interaction between polymer molecules k and Z. (b) Enlargement of the volume element 8V. [Pg.521]

Polymers can be used for mobility control. The interaction between polymers and surfactants is shown to be affected by pH, ionic strength, crude oil type, and the properties of the polymers and surfactants [642]. [Pg.198]

In order to understand polymer solution behaviour, the samples have to be characterised with respect to their molecular configuration, their molar mass and polydispersity, the polymer concentration and the shear rate. Classical techniques of polymer characterisation (light scattering, viscometry, ultracentrifugation, etc.) yield information on the solution structure and conformation of single macromolecules, as well as on the thermodynamic interactions with the solvent. In technical concentrations the behaviour of the dissolved polymer is more complicated because additional intramolecular and intermolecular interactions between polymer segments appear. [Pg.8]

Adsorption of the polymer molecule causes a reduction of its conformational entropy (Norde 2003b). Flence, adsorption takes place only if the loss in conformational entropy is compensated by sufficient favorable interactions between polymer segments and the interface. Because the polymer molecule attaches with many segments at the interface, it adsorbs tenaciously with a very high affinity, even if the interaction of the individual segments with the interface is rather weak. The high affinity manifests itself by the adsorption being irreversible with respect to variations of the polymer concentration in solution. [Pg.101]

The experiments are based on the fact that the probability of energy transfer between the two chromophores depends strongly on their separation distance [314]. For the Np-Py pair the characteristic distance of the process is 28.9 A [315]. Thus, the occurrence of NRET between Np and Py in dilute mixed solutions of polymers carrying either Np or Py signals the existence of interpolymeric association. By assessing the extent of energy transfer under various circumstances it becomes possible to monitor closely the interactions between polymer chains. [Pg.68]


See other pages where Interaction between polymers is mentioned: [Pg.2364]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.231]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.231 ]




SEARCH



Chemical Interactions to the Adhesion Between Evaporated Metals and Functional Croups of Different Types at Polymer Surfaces

Crystalline polymers, interactions between carbon nanotubes

Effects of Concentration and Interactions Between Polymer Stars

Interaction Forces (Energies) Between Particles or Droplets Containing Adsorbed Non-ionic Surfactants and Polymers

Interaction between solvent and polymer

Interaction between two polymers

Polymer/surfactant systems interaction between polymers

Polymers between

Polymers interaction between spheres

Polymers interactions

Polymers interactions between layers

Repulsion, interactions between polymer-bearing

Thermodynamic interaction between polymer and surface

Two Identical Sites on a Polymer Direct Interaction between the Ligands

© 2024 chempedia.info