Integration limit optimum

As is extensively shown in a previous paper ( ), it happens to be possible in some cases to determine optimum integration limits. 

Structural integrity limits the maximum filler content. Therefore, to establish the optimum filler content for a given thermoplastic, a balance of LPV, wear rate, and structural integrity must be determined. 

The Ziegler and Nichols closed-loop method requires forcing the loop to cycle uniformly under proportional control. The natural period of the cycle—the proportional controller contributes no phase shift to alter it—is used to set the optimum integral and derivative time constants. The optimum proportional band is set relative to the undamped proportional band P , which produced the uniform oscillation. Table 8-4 lists the tuning rules for a lag-dominant process. A uniform cycle can also be forced using on/off control to cycle the manipulated variable between two limits. The period of the cycle will be close to if the cycle is symmetrical the peak-to-peak amphtude of the controlled variable divided by the difference between the output limits A, is a measure of process gain at that period and is therefore related to for the proportional cycle ... 

The achievement of an economic optimum is limited by requirements of selectivity, energy efficiency, safety, and pollution control. The total design of production reactors therefore involves a few more tasks than the basic integration method. 

Hirschfeld, in his article on coupled techniques, defined, a hyphenated instrument as one in which both instruments are automated together as a single integrated unit via a hardware interface. . . whose function is to reconcile the often extremely contradictory output limitations of one instrument and the input limitation of the other (22). Therefore, the key to combining SFE with chromatographic techniques is the interface which should allow the optimum and independent usage of each instrument while the couple still operate as an integrated unit (23). 

Armed with this knowledge, we then set out to examine the fluid mechanics of the reactor. Limiting asymptotic solutions are obtained for some of the flow equations which allow the determination of the optimum flow configuration for actual conditions which approximate those assumed. Outside the domain of validity of the asymptotic solutions, numerical integration must be applied, of course. These results substantiate conclusions arrived at using the asymptotic solutions, even in parametric regions where the... 

As seen in the previous chapter, all the approaches used to solve the dynamie optimization problem integrate, at some point, the dynamical system of the ehemieal proeess. In order to obtain more effieiently the values of the optimum profile of the control variable, a suitable model of the system should be developed. That means that the complexity of the model should be limited, but, in the same time, the model should represent the plant behaviour with good accuracy. The best way to obtain such a model is by using the model reduction techniques. However, the use of a classical model reduction approach is not always able to lead to a solution [6]. And very often, the physical structure of the problem is destroyed. Thus, the procedure has to be performed taking into account the process knowledge (units, components, species etc.). 

The RATIO method table (Table I) includes provision for specifying upper and lower limits of integration for both primary and reference bands with the peak area evaluation procedure. The practical limits of the integration can be determined empirically by evaluating a set of spectra stored on microfloppy disks with varying limits set in the appropriate locations in the method table. Optimum limits can be determined from the calibration plots and related error parameters. The calibration plots shown in Figures 4 and 5 indicate that both evaluation procedures, peak height and peak area provide essentially the same level of precision for the linear least squares fit of the data. The error index and correlation coefficients listed on each table are both indicators of the relative scatter in the data from the least squares fit line. The correlation coefficient is calculated as traditionally defined in statistics. 

The optimum design requires iterative numerical work hence machine computation greatly simplifies the optimization task. In this book we shall limit the problem to answering design questions for a single set of design conditions. Even for such a limited scope we shall find that the numerical integrations often require repetitive calculations well suited for machine solution. 

---