Inequality forms

Inequality Re > H corresponds to the other case, when only a part of a penetrant is extracted by a developer and can form crack s indication. Such a situation can take place when one use kaolin powder as the developer. We measured experimentally the values Rj for some kaolin powders. For the developer s layer of kaolin powder, applied on tested surface. Re = 8 - 20 pm depending on powder s quality. 

Defect s indication of linear size W (and larger) are forming above such the cracks, the width of which satisfies the inequality... 

Variational inequality characterizing an interaction between the punch and the plate can be written in the form... 

It turns out that an equivalent form of the variational inequality (1.71) can be given. Namely, the following theorem is valid. 

Multiplying by 0 > 0 and adding u, this inequality takes the form... 

This means that A is the duality mapping connected with the introduced scalar product ( , - )a- Then the variational inequality (1.126) can be rewritten in the form... 

In this subsection we prove an existence theorem of the equilibrium problem for the plate. The problem is formulated as a variational inequality which together with (3.2), (3.5) contains full information about other boundary conditions holding on x (0, T). An exact form of these conditions is found in the next subsection. 

Introduce the notation U = ui,U2) and take the test functions of the form (W, w) in (3.10). This implies the variational inequality... 

In this section we consider the boundary value problem for model equations of a thermoelastic plate with a vertical crack (see Khludnev, 1996d). The unknown functions in the mathematical model under consideration are such quantities as the temperature 9 and the horizontal and vertical displacements W = (w, w ), w of the mid-surface points of the plate. We use the so-called coupled model of thermoelasticity, which implies in particular that we need to solve simultaneously the equations that describe heat conduction and the deformation of the plate. The presence of the crack leads to the fact that the domain of a solution has a nonsmooth boundary. As before, the main feature of the problem as a whole is the existence of a constraint in the form of an inequality imposed on the crack faces. This constraint provides a mutual nonpenetration of the crack faces ... 

We prove the solvability of the problem. We also find boundary conditions holding on the crack faces and having the form of a system of equations and inequalities and establish some enhanced regularity properties for the solution near the points of the crack. Some other results on thermoelasic problems can be found in (Gilbert et al., 1990 Zuazua, 1995). 

The equilibrium problem for a plate is formulated as some variational inequality. In this case equations (3.92)-(3.94) hold, generally speaking, only in the distribution sense. Alongside (3.95), other boundary conditions hold on the boundary F the form of these conditions is clarified in Section 3.3.3. To derive them, we require the existence of a smooth solution to the variational inequality in question. On the other hand, if we assume that a solution to (3.92)-(3.94) is sufficiently smooth, then the variational inequality is a consequence of equations (3.92)-(3.94) and the initial and boundary conditions. All these questions are discussed in Section 3.3.3. In Section 3.3.2 we prove an existence theorem for a solution to the variational equation and in Section 3.3.4 we establish some enhanced regularity properties for the solution near F. ... 

Then problem (3.114) can be written down in equivalent form by means of the following two variational inequalities ... 

The considered problem is formulated as a variational inequality. In general, the equations (3.140)-(3.142) hold in the sense of distributions. In addition to (3.143), complementary boundary conditions will be fulfilled on F, X (0,T). The exact form of these conditions is given at the end of the section. The assumption as to sufficient solution regularity requires the variational inequality to be a corollary of (3.140)-(3.142), the initial and all boundary conditions. The relationship between these two problem formulations is discussed in Section 3.4.4. We prove an existence of the solution in Section 3.4.2. In Section 3.4.3 the main result of the section concerned with the cracks of minimal opening is established. 

Attouch H., Picard C. (1983) Variational inequalities with varying obstacles The general form of the limit problem. J. Punct. Anal. 50 (3), 329-386. 

The new approach to crack theory used in the book is intriguing in that it fails to lead to physical contradictions. Given a classical approach to the description of cracks in elastic bodies, the boundary conditions on crack faces are known to be considered as equations. In a number of specific cases there is no difflculty in finding solutions of such problems leading to physical contradictions. It is precisely these crack faces for such solutions that penetrate each other. Boundary conditions analysed in the book are given in the form of inequalities, and they are properly nonpenetration conditions of crack faces. The above implies that similar problems may be considered from the contact mechanics standpoint. 

Each of the inequality constraints gj(z) multiphed by what is called a Kuhn-Tucker multiplier is added to form the Lagrange function. The necessaiy conditions for optimality, called the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions for inequality-constrained optimization problems, are... 

This transformation has removed the elastic stress work, whose integral around the cycle is zero, leaving only the inelastic stress work done during the cycle. Using this result, the work inequality (5.37) can be written in the form... 

The above inequality, called a slope condition, is the requirement for thermal insensitivity, expressed here for first order reactions. This form was derived by Perlmutter in (1972.) In most cases it is adequate to define the condition for a stable reactor, but not always. The area of sensitive domain was defined by Van Heerden (1953.)... 

We note that the simplex process is currently used to solve linear programs far more frequently than any other method. Briefly, this method of solution begins by choosing basis vectors in m-dimensions where m is the number of inequalities. (The latter are reduced to equalities by introducing slack variables.) For brevity we omit discussion of the case where it is not possible to form such a basis. The components of each vector comprise the coefficients of one of the variables, the first component being the coefficient of the variable in the first inequality, the second component is the coefficient of the same... 

---