Induction/dispersion interactions energy

Long-range forces are most conveniently expressed as a power series in Mr, the reciprocal of the intemiolecular distance. This series is called the multipole expansion. It is so connnon to use the multipole expansion that the electrostatic, mduction and dispersion energies are referred to as non-expanded if the expansion is not used. In early work it was noted that the multipole expansion did not converge in a conventional way and doubt was cast upon its use in the description of long-range electrostatic, induction and dispersion interactions. However, it is now established [8, 9, 10, H, 12 and 13] that the series is asymptotic in Poincare s sense. The interaction energy can be written as... 

Table 2.4 lists the individual contributions or partial polarities for the solutes that appear in table 2.2. From this table, it is clear that a distinction can now be made between molecules of similar overall polarity. Much of the cohesive energy of toluene is due to dispersion interaction, whereas dipole orientation is more important in ethyl acetate. Orientation interaction is of more relevance in methylene chloride than it is in dioxane, which shows a considerable contribution from induction interaction. 

Equation (32) represents the first-order electrostatic energy, whereas equations (33), (34) represent the second-order contributions for the induction and dispersion energies, respectively Ers = closed-shell neutral atoms, then the electrostatic and induction energies vanish for large values of r, and the dispersion energy is the first nonzero term of the interaction energy. 

Van der Waals interactions are noncovalent and nonelectrostatic forces that result from three separate phenomena permanent dipole-dipole (orientation) interactions, dipole-induced dipole (induction) interactions, and induced dipole-induced dipole (dispersion) interactions [46]. The dispersive interactions are universal, occurring between individual atoms and predominant in clay-water systems [23]. The dispersive van der Waals interactions between individual molecules were extended to macroscopic bodies by Hamaker [46]. Hamaker s work showed that the dispersive (or London) van der Waals forces were significant over larger separation distances for macroscopic bodies than they were for singled molecules. Through a pairwise summation of interacting molecules it can be shown that the potential energy of interaction between flat plates is [7, 23]... 

Since the single-center multipole expansion of the interaction energy is divergent, one could use a kind of multicenter expansion. One can hope that the multipole expansion will provide better results if multipole moments and polarizabilities localized at various points of a molecule are used instead of global multipole moments and polarizabilities. This idea forms the basis of the so-called distributed multipole analysis of the electrostatic, induction, and dispersion interactions between molecules187 195. 

The induction-dispersion contribution, in turn, can be interpreted as the energy of the (second-order) dispersion interaction of the monomer X with the monomer Y deformed by the electrostatic field of the monomer Z (note that we have six such contributions). In particular, when X=A, Y=B, and Z=C the corresponding induction-dispersion contribution in terms of response functions is given by,... 

We wish to end this section by saying that similarly as in the two-body case, nonadditive induction, induction-dispersion, and dispersion terms have well defined asymptotic behaviors from the multipole expansions of the intermolecular interaction operators. For instance, the leading term in the multipole expansion of the three-body dispersion energy for three atoms in a triangular geometry is given by the famous Axilrod-Teller-Muto formula311,312,... 

For multi-molecular assemblies one has to consider whether the total interaction energy can be written as the sum of pairwise interactions. The first-order electrostatic interaction is exactly pairwise additive, the dispersion only up to second order (in third order a generally small three-body Axilrod-Teller term appears [73]) while the induction is not at all pairwise it is non-linearly additive due to the interference of electric fields from different sources. Moreover, for polar systems the inducing fields are strong enough to change the molecular wave functions significantly. 

With the success of these calculations for isolated molecules, we began a systematic series of supermolecule calculations. As discussed previously, these are ab initio molecular orbital calculations over a cluster of nuclear centers representing two or more molecules. Self-consistent field calculations include all the electrostatic, penetration, exchange, and induction portions of the intermolecular interaction energy, but do not treat the dispersion effects which can be treated by the post Hartree-Fock techniques for electron correlation [91]. The major problems of basis set superposition errors (BSSE) [82] are primarily associated with the calculation of the energy. 

As the understanding of chemical bonding was advanced through such concepts as covalent and ionic bond, lone electron pairs etc., the theory of intermolecular forces also attempted to break down the interaction energy into a few simple and physically sensible concepts. To describe the nonrelativistic intermolecular interactions it is sufficient to express them in terms of the aforementioned four fundamental components electrostatic, induction, dispersion and exchange energies. 

The water dimer is the most important H-bonded system. The major attractive contribution to the interaction energy of the water dimer is the electrostatic effect. It dominates over other attractive terms, such as the induction and dispersion energies, and it is the most anisotropic. To discuss the properties of the fundamental components in the water dimer case we chose to demonstrate the angular dependence of various terms in the dimer geometry derived from the cyclic configuration of a trimer (see Fig 6). 

The authors go on to conclude that the red shift of the v, band in this H-bonded complex can be directly attributed to the lengthening of the Oj—H bond. By partitioning the interaction energy into various components, they show how the stretch of this bond makes it both more polar and polarizable, which in mrn, increases the induction and charge transfer components of the interaction energy. Although the authors did not include correlation in their treatment, the same could be said for dispersion energy which is directly related to polarizabilities of the individual monomers. It is for this reason that a nearly linear relation-.ship is observed between Av and Ar. Zilles and Person have reached a similar conclusion that the polarity and polarizability of the O—H bond increases upon formation of the H-... 

---