Solutions 1-12 INDEX

Fig. 16.5 Response to refractive index interrogation of a single NOSA waveguide, (a) Output spectrum for a NOSA where one of the five resonators is fluidically targeted, first with water and then with a CaCl2 solution. The resonance of the targeted resonator shifts toward the red end of the spectrum due to the higher refractive index of the CaCl2 solution, (b) Experimental data (with error bars indicating inter device variability) showing the redshifts for various refractive index solutions. The solid line is the theoretically predicted redshift from FDTD simulations. The experimental data is in excellent agreement with the theory. Reprinted from Ref. 37 with permission. 2008 Optical Society of America...

Inject 1 pi indexing solution of n-alkanes and start the GC program. 

Make a stock cesium chloride solution in the following manner Add 130 g CsCl to 75 ml of 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.5. Dissolve and treat for 20 min with 2 g activated charcoal to remove any material absorbing at 260 nm. Filter. Determine the exact concentration of CsCl from the refractive index. Solutions are usually approximately 1.87 g/ml, and about 405 pi is used in a total volume of 500 p. ... 

Refractive index solutions, alcohols, ketones and phenols. 

Soc. 1956, 72-5. Refractive index solutions, amines, amides, azo compounds. 

The presence of distinct systematic absences and an unambiguous determination of the diffraction group makes a particular indexing solution especially probable. Exceptionally encouraging are centered lattices and, for example, such space groups as P2)/c, Pbca, I4i/amd,... 

Other attempts, including eliminating some weak and suspicious Bragg peaks, did not result in a better indexing solution. Thus, this unit cell was considered as true after it was additionally confirmed by refinement of lattice parameters using all Bragg peaks observed up to 20 = 60". The final confirmation of the indexing solution was obtained after the crystal structure was determined and refined as will be discussed in Chapters 6 and 7. 

Table 5.24. Indexing solutions describing Fe7(P04)e powder diffraction data obtained using ...

Figure 9.9 shows HP steam consumption under different parameter settings of A, B, and C. Solution D was omitted as the differences between D and C are relatively small. For this performance index, solution A consumes the least steam while solution C the most. Here, the steam consumption of solution C was sacrificed to achieve more gains in the fuel gas and energy gain. The cost of steam consumption is calculated in Table 9.7. 

To eliminate the problems associated with the washing step, Okazaki, Smith, and Moodie proposed a CEC procedure in which salts are not removed between the index cation saturation and extraction steps. Rather, the anion of the salt providing the index cation is analyzed in the final extract. In accordance with electrical neutrality, the CEC is then equal to the total quantity of index cations removed during extraction minus the quantity of index anions removed simultaneously. The main potential source of error from this procedure arises from anion repulsion, if the quantity of index salt remaining after saturation is merely calculated from the weight of solution retained and its initial (or average) concentration. This error minimized if the index solution is lowered to approximately 0.1 M during the final two saturation washes. The error is eliminated if the quantities of index salt are analytically determined instead. 

The CEC is being estimated by the Okazaki, Smith, and Moodie procedure. If 5 g of soil retain 3 g 0.1 M(+) index solution after centrifugation and decanting, and if the total index cation retained is subsequently determined to be 1.6 mmol(-r), what is the CEC of the sample Based on the anion distribution of Problem 1, what percentage error is contributed in this case by anion exclusion, if the soil has a reactive surface area of 200 x I03 m2 kg-1 ... 

Helene Cecilie Blakstad in her contribution (Chapter 9) to this volume lists more specific indicators for risk evaluation related to accident prevention and crisis management. She compares the British and Norwegian safety indicators and comes to the conclusion that a multiple indicator set is preferable over a single index solution. This applies to both Norway and the United Kingdom. The United States, in contrast, has been less attentive to indicators of accident prevention and more focused on risk characterization. 

VARs = indets(eq alg[n],indexed) solution = solve( eq alg[n], VARs) assign(solution) ... 

---