Labeled immunosensors

Fig. 9. Immunosensor approaches where A is the analyte, is the labeled analyte, and Y is the antibody, (a) Direct immunosensors where the actual antigen—antibody interaction is measured (b) indirect immunosensors 1 and 2 which utilize formats similar to competitive and displacement...

Enzyme Immunosensors. Enzyme immunosensors are enzyme immunoassays coupled with electrochemical sensors. These sensors (qv) require multiple steps for analyte determination, and either sandwich assays or competitive binding assays maybe used. Both of these assays use antibodies for the analyte of interest attached to a membrane on the surface of an electrochemical sensor. In the sandwich assay type, the membrane-bound antibody binds the sample antigen, which in turn binds another antibody that is enzyme-labeled. This immunosensor is then placed in a solution containing the substrate for the labeling enzyme and the rate of product formation is measured electrochemically. The rate of the reaction is proportional to the amount of bound enzyme and thus to the amount of the analyte antigen. The sandwich assay can be used only with antigens capable of binding two different antibodies simultaneously (53). 

Competitive immunoassays may also be used to determine small chemical substances [10, 11]. An electrochemical immunosensor based on a competitive immunoassay for the small molecule estradiol has recently been reported [11]. A schematic diagram of this immunoassay is depicted in Fig. 5.3. In this system, anti-mouse IgG was physisorbed onto the surface of an SPCE. This was used to bind monoclonal mouse anti-estradiol antibody. The antibody coated SPCE was then exposed to a standard solution of estradiol (E2), followed by a solution of AP-labeled estradiol (AP-E2). The E2 and AP-E2 competed for a limited number of antigen binding sites of the immobilized anti-estradiol antibody. Quantitative analysis was based on differential pulse voltammetry of 1-naphthol, which is produced from the enzymatic hydrolysis of the enzyme substrate 1-naphthyl phosphate by AP-E2. The analytical range of this sensor was between 25 and 500pg ml. 1 of E2. 

There are many other examples of competitive electrochemical immunoassays and immunosensors for detecting clinically important analytes [12-14], Despite simplicity, a disadvantage of competitive immunoassays is that labeling the analyte may reduce, or totally remove, its binding affinity for antibody. This would occur if the analyte were labeled at a site that is closely associated with an epitope. 

FIGURE 5.6 Schematic representation of the immunosensor based on a Protein A-GEB biocomposite as a transducer, (a) Immobilization of RlgG on the surface via interaction with Protein A, (b) competitive immunoassay using anti-RIgG and biotinylated anti-RIgG, (c) enzyme labeling using HRP-streptavidin and (d) electrochemical enzyme activity determination. (Reprinted from [31] with permission from Elsevier.)... 

In amperometry, the current produced by the oxidation or reduction of an electroactive analyte species at an electrode surface is monitored under controlled potential conditions. The magnitude of the current is then related to the quantity of analyte present. However, as both antibody and antigen are not intrinsically electroactive, a suitable label must be introduced to the immunocomplex to promote an electrochemical reaction at the immunosensors. In this respect, enzyme labels including the... 

M. Akram, M.C. Stuart, and D.K.Y. Wong, Signal generation at an electrochemical immunosensor via the direct oxidation of an electroactive label. Electroanalysis 18, 237-246 (2006). 

S. Grant, F. Davis, K.A. Law, A.C. Barton, S.D. Collyer, S.P.J. Higson, and T.D. Gibson, Label-free and reversible immunosensor based upon an AC impedance interrogation protocol. Anal. Chim. Acta 537, 163-168 (2005). 

There are mainly three types of transducers used in immunosensors electrochemical, optical, and microgravimetric transducers. The immunosensors may operate either as direct immunosensors or as indirect ones. For direct immunosensors, the transducers directly detect the physical or chemical effects resulting from the immunocomplex formation at the interfaces, with no additional labels used. The direct immunosensors detect the analytes in real time. For indirect immunosensors, one or multiple labeled bio-reagents are commonly used during the detection processes, and the transducers should detect the signals from the labels. These indirect detections used to need several washing and separation steps and are sometimes called immunoassays. Compared with the direct immunosensors, the indirect immunosensors may have higher sensitivity and better ability to defend interference from non-specific adsorption. 

Z.H. Wang and G. Jin, A label-free multisensing immunosensor based on imaging ellipsometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 6119-6123 (2003). 

---