Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Identity confusion

All molecules possess the identity element of symmetry, for which the symbol is / (some authors use E, but this may cause confusion with the E symmetry species see Section 4.3.2). The symmetry operation / consists of doing nothing to the molecule, so that it may seem too trivial to be of importance but it is a necessary element required by the mles of group theory. Since the C operation is a rotation by 2n radians, Ci = I and the symbol is not used. [Pg.77]

When 2,4-DHMP was allowed to condense, 3,3 -dihydroxymethyl-4,4 -dihy-droxydiphenyl methane was the main product. Scheme 7 shows the two main products developed. It seems likely that both products have reacted through loss of a /J-HMP group. There is some confusion in the paper regarding the identity of the minor product, however, the structure shown appears to be the most likely one [1281. [Pg.910]

In some cases products and services are offered in several models, types, or other designations but are basically of the same design. Those which meet the higher specification are graded as such and those which fail may meet a lower specification and can be regraded. The grading should be reflected in the product identity so that there is no confusion. [Pg.441]

There has been much confusion over the structure of these compounds but their diamagnetism has long ruled out a monomeric formulation, H2PO3. In fact, as shown in Table 12.7, isomeric forms are known (a) hypophosphoric acid and hypophosphates in which both P atoms are identical and there is a direct P-P bond (h) isohypophosphoric acid and isohypophos-phates in which 1 P has a direct P-H bond... [Pg.515]

When 1,5-dienes are heated, they isomerize, in a [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement known as the Cope rearrangement (not to be confused with the Cope elimination reaction, 17-8)When the diene is symmetrical about the 3,4 bond, we have the unusual situation where a reaction gives a product identical with the starting material ... [Pg.1444]

In this method the liquid of Interest Is sheared between two seml-Inflnlte reservoirs. The reservoirs contain particles Identical with the ones In the main liquid slab and at the same density. The reservoir particles and the particles of the main liquid slab Interact by exerting forces on each other but they do not mix because they are separated by Impenetrable hard walls extending on the yz plane. Therefore, the reservoirs are fluld-llke and confine the main liquid slab In the x direction. Despite appearances, the main liquid slab behaves like a bulk fiuld because the reservoirs Induce no significant structure In the confined liquid. Furthermore, the hard Impenetrable reservoir walls are not to be confused with the fiat 10-4 LJ pore walls mentioned In the previous subsection. [Pg.268]

A sound information transfer system to avoid confusion of chemical identities and to ensure the specific risks of each load are identified and made known to the carrier/transporter. [Pg.482]

It must be underlined that independently of the MS equipment characteristics, no information about stereo-chemistry can be obtained. In fact, cis and trans isomers of the corresponding carotenoid showed identical mass spectra, as did carotenoids with epoxide groups at 5,6 and 5,8 positions. In addition, special care should be taken in assigning carotenoid molecular masses to avoid confusion due to the various ions that may be formed depending on measurement conditions. [Pg.469]

The chemical and physical properties of the polymers obtained by these alternate methods are identical, except insofar as they are affected by differences in molecular weight. In order to avoid the confusion which would result if classification of the products were to be based on the method of synthesis actually employed in each case, it has been proposed that the substance be referred to as a condensation polymer in such instances, irrespective of whether a condensation or an addition polymerization process was used in its preparation. The cyclic compound is after all a condensation product of one or more bifunctional compounds, and in this sense the linear polymer obtained from the cyclic intermediate can be regarded as the polymeric derivative of the bifunctional monomer(s). Furthermore, each of the polymers listed in Table III may be degraded to bifunctional monomers differing in composition from the structural unit, although such degradation of polyethylene oxide and the polythioether may be difficult. Apart from the demands of any particular definition, it is clearly desirable to include all of these substances among the condensation... [Pg.57]

A parameter that is convenient for said purpose is the electrode potential E it must not be confused with the concept of a potential difference between the electrode and the electrolyte. By convention the term electrode potential E is used to denote the OCV of a galvanic cell that consists of the given electrode (the one that is studied) and a reference electrode selected arbitrarily. Thus, the potential of this electrode is compared with that of a reference electrode that is identical for all electrodes being studied. In accordance with this dehnition, the electrode potential of the reference electrode itself is (conventionally) regarded as zero. Any electrode system for which the equilibrium Galvani potential is established sufficiently rapidly and reproducibly can be used as a reference electrode. We shall write the electrode system to be used as the reference electrode, generally, as M /E ... [Pg.29]

A number of analogs were prepared to arrive at the above relationship. However, the identity of the chemicals needed for haustorial initiation and produced by any cereal crop remains unknown. The possibility of using a chemical to suppress or confuse haustorial formation has been recognized, but only a little work has been done on this aspect of control. The germinated seed will die in a short time if haustorial initiation and attachment are not realized. [Pg.448]

However, you will find that the MATLAB result is not identical to (E4-5). It has to do with the fact that there is no unique representation of a state space model. To avoid unnecessary confusion, the differences with MATLAB are explained in MATLAB Session 4. [Pg.66]


See other pages where Identity confusion is mentioned: [Pg.393]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.1002]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.501]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.89 ]




SEARCH



Confusion

© 2024 chempedia.info