Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrophobicity change

The high Si Al ratio of the material, typically around 10, makes the material inherently hydrophobic. Changing the Si Al ratio of the material has, however, a marked influence on the hydrophobicity. The increased hydrophobicity of siliceous Beta has been demonstrated by competitive adsorption of toluene and water. The so-called hydrophobicity index32, the amount of toluene adsorbed divided by the amount of water adsorbed at 25 °C amounts to 1.4 to 2.2 for a Si Al = 10 sample and increases to 10.8 to 66 for the all-silica material (see Table 2). The large difference observed for the all-silica zeolites is most likely due to differences in the amount of defects in the material. These defects are essentially silanol pairs required for template charge compensation during synthesis as shown by van der Waal et al.12... [Pg.28]

M. Suzuki, J. Shigematsu, Y. Fukunishi, Y. Harada, and T. Yanagida, T. Komada, Coupling of Protein Surface Hydrophobicity Change to ATP Hydrolysis by Myosin Motor Domain. Biophys. J., 71,18-23,1997. [Pg.324]

Bonomi, F. lametti, S. Real-time monitoring of the surface hydrophobicity changes associated with isothermal treatment of milk and milk protein fractions. Milchwissenschaft 1991, 46, 71—74. [Pg.42]

Eynard, L. lametti, S. Relkin, R Bonomi, F. Surface hydrophobicity changes and heat-induced modifications of lactalbumin. y. Agric. Food Chem. 40,1992, 1731—1736. [Pg.42]

One solution was given by dielectric analysis of myosin SI solution [7]. The study showed a 8% reduction of the hydrophobic hydration number of 1,400 per SI, which is proportional to the hydrophobic surface area [8, 9] of an SI molecule at the M.ADP.Pi state and hydrophobicity recovery at the M.ADP state. The surface of SI at the M.ADP.Pi state is less hydrophobic than that at the M.ADP state (Fig. 2). In addition a liquid chromatographic study [10] showed the surface hydrophobicity decrease of SI in the presence of ATP. Thus, AA>0 at the step from the M.ATP state to the M.ADP.Pi state was explained by dehydration of the protein, and AH is compensated by -TAS. The position of such a hydrophobicity change is considered to be the actin binding site as discussed previously [7]. [Pg.39]

The current understanding of mechanical PTL degradation is hmited (Lee et al., 1999 and Merida, 2007 Wilde et al., 2004) and has not received the attention devoted to other degradation mechanisms (e.g., hydrophobicity changes). [Pg.126]

All these efforts illustrate that the direct thermal and mechanical effects can be significant, but may not be sufficient to explain the overall degradation mechanisms. Secondary mechanical degradation mechanisms may be present, and they could he similar to those suggested hy Wood et al. in the context of hydrophobicity changes (see Section 5.4.3). [Pg.127]

The most important degradation is related to changes in the mass transport. Of these, the changes associated with liquid water, oxygen, and water vapor have the greatest impact on performance and durability. The most important degradation mechanisms include chemical and electrochemical hydrophobicity changes on the surfaces and porous layers. [Pg.131]

Fig. 3 (a) Application of a high performance surface treated with a stimuli-responsive polymer for separation and purification of materials, (b) Schematic diagram of the hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity changes of a thermoresponsive PNIPAAm graft surface upon temperature changes. [Pg.567]

It has been shown that increased hydrophobic interaction is the driving force in materials separation in aqueous systems as a result of increased hydrophobicity of surfaces following temperature increases. Furthermore, the authors applied the PNIPAAm-fixed surface to active field flow separation-cell adsorption chromatography using thermorespon-sive hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity changes. They succeeded in changing the interaction of the surface with lymphocyte [132]. [Pg.580]

H. Hillborg, U.W. Gedde, Hydrophobicity changes in silicone rubbers, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Vol. 6, Issue 5, p. 603-717, Oct. 1999. [Pg.15]

The present study demonstrated that interactions of the thermosensitive polymer-modified liposomes with model membranes and cells were suppressed by the hydrated polymer chains attached to the liposome surface below the LCST. However, the hydrophilic-to-hydrophobic change of the tethered polymer chains above the LCST enhanced their interactions. As a... [Pg.264]


See other pages where Hydrophobicity change is mentioned: [Pg.301]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.1048]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.863]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.863]    [Pg.883]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.263]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.165 , Pg.166 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info