Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrogen randomization

For a number of specifically-labelled 1-methylimidazoles the early stages of the mass spectral fragmentation have been examined in some detail. The relative losses of labelled and unlabelled HCN from the and [M-lT species show that there is an insignificant amount of hydrogen-randomization in the molecular ions prior to fragmentation. Sub-... [Pg.358]

The fact that the decomposition of ionized methylpropene (106) at longer lifetimes is preceded not only by hydrogen randomization but also by participation of the C(2) carbon atom (indicated with an asterisk in Scheme 14) in the expulsion of ethylene has been explained by invoking the intermediate existence of methylcyclopropane (107) and 2-butene (108) (Scheme 14). This is in line with the finding that direct ionization of neutral methylcyclopropane gives 107 which is known to undergo ethylene loss. The isomerization sequence described in Scheme 14 can be viewed as a further example for a mass spectrometric dyotropic rearrangement ". ... [Pg.186]

The relative losses of unlabeled vs. labeled HCN from the M and [M — 1] ions of a number of specifically labeled 1-methylimidazoles (and 1-methylpyrazoles) show that hydrogen randomization in the molecular ions prior to fragmentation is insignificant. The expulsion of HCN can follow two distinct pathways elimination involving positions 2 and 3 (predominant in 1-methylimidazole), and elimination involving N(l) and its attached methyl group (predominant in 1-methylpyrazole). The molecular... [Pg.277]

Hydrogenated random copolymers of 1.4- and 1.2-butadiene represent another class of crystalline-amorphous materials [10-15,17). Following hydrogenation, the resultant copolyolefin contains ethylene (E) and 1-butene (B) units. These materials can be described as PEB-n where n denotes the mun-ber of ethyl units per 100 backbone carbons. Eor samples where n < 12 the samples will show partial crystallinity at room temperature while for n > 13 the samples are amorphous in the bulk state. The latter PEB copolymers lack self-assembly capacity. An equivalent amorphous segment is derived from polyisoprene. In this case hydrogenation yields the essentially alternating ethylene-propylene copolymer (PEP). This material also contains about 7% isopropyl units that randomly appear between the ethylene-propylene units. [Pg.11]

When standardizing a solution of NaOH against potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP), a variety of systematic and random errors are possible. Identify, with justification, whether the following are systematic or random sources of error, or if they have no effect. If the error is systematic, then indicate whether the experimentally determined molarity for NaOH will be too high or too low. The standardization reaction is... [Pg.363]

Equation (8.97) shows that the second virial coefficient is a measure of the excluded volume of the solute according to the model we have considered. From the assumption that solute molecules come into surface contact in defining the excluded volume, it is apparent that this concept is easier to apply to, say, compact protein molecules in which hydrogen bonding and disulfide bridges maintain the tertiary structure (see Sec. 1.4) than to random coils. We shall return to the latter presently, but for now let us consider the application of Eq. (8.97) to a globular protein. This is the objective of the following example. [Pg.557]

Commercially, anionic polymerization is limited to three monomers styrene, butadiene, and isoprene [78-79-5], therefore only two useful A—B—A block copolymers, S—B—S and S—I—S, can be produced direcdy. In both cases, the elastomer segments contain double bonds which are reactive and limit the stabhity of the product. To improve stabhity, the polybutadiene mid-segment can be polymerized as a random mixture of two stmctural forms, the 1,4 and 1,2 isomers, by addition of an inert polar material to the polymerization solvent ethers and amines have been suggested for this purpose (46). Upon hydrogenation, these isomers give a copolymer of ethylene and butylene. [Pg.15]

There is a scattered body of data in the literature on ordinary photochemical reactions in the pyrimidine and quinazoline series in most cases the mechanisms are unclear. For example, UV irradiation of 4-aminopyrimidine-5-carbonitrile (109 R=H) in methanolic hydrogen chloride gives the 2,6-dimethyl derivative (109 R = Me) in good yield the 5-aminomethyl analogue is made similarly (68T5861). Another random example is the irradiation of 4,6-diphenylpyrimidine 1-oxide in methanol to give 2-methoxy-4,6-diphenyl-pyrimidine, probably by addition of methanol to an intermediate oxaziridine (110) followed by dehydration (76JCS(P1)1202). [Pg.73]

Another interesting fact is that hydrogen scrambling, i.e. randomization of the ring hydrogens of pyrazole to lose positional identity on electron impact, has not been observed to any significant extent (see however 780MS575). [Pg.202]

In conclusion, one important factor that contributes to the strong affinity of TBP proteins to TATA boxes is the large hydrophobic interaction area between them. Major distortions of the B-DNA structure cause the DNA to present a wide and shallow minor groove surface that is sterically complementary to the underside of the saddle structure of the TBP protein. The complementarity of these surfaces, and in addition the six specific hydrogen bonds between four side chains from TBP and four hydrogen bond acceptors from bases in the minor groove, are the main factors responsible for causing TBP to bind to TATA boxes 100,000-fold more readily than to a random DNA sequence. [Pg.158]

It must be pointed out that deviations from such a simple relationship do occur. For example, since random copolymerisation tends to promote disorder, reduce molecular packing and also reduce the interchain forces of attraction, the Tg of copolymers is often lower than would be predicted by the linear relationship. Examples are also known where the Tg of the copolymer is higher than predicted. This could occur where hydrogen bonding or dipole attraction is possible between dissimilar comonomer residues in the chain but not between similar residues, i.e. special interchain forces exist with the copolymers. [Pg.63]


See other pages where Hydrogen randomization is mentioned: [Pg.128]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.2644]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.455]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.186 ]




SEARCH



Hydrogen randomization Ions

Hydrogen-deuterium exchange random coil structure

Intramolecular hydrogen randomization

© 2024 chempedia.info