Hydrogen radical reactivity

The very reactive phenyl radical reacts with the aromatic substrate 2, present in the reaction mixture. Subsequent loss of a hydrogen radical, which then combines with 7 to give 4, yields a biaryl coupling product e.g. the unsymmetrical biphenyl derivative 3 ... 

Bamford, Jenkins and coworkers131157 concluded that many of the limitations of the Q-e scheme stemmed from its empirical nature and proposed a new scheme containing a radical reactivity term, based on experimentally measured values of the rate constant for abstraction of benzylic hydrogen from toluene (Ay i), a polar term (the Hammett o value) and two constants a and J which are specific for a given monomer or substrate (eq. 57) 146... 

Where monomers or radicals arc charged, readily ionizablc or capable of forming hydrogen bonds, mechanisms whereby the solvent could affect radical reactivity by disruption or involvement of hydrogen bonding may seem obvious. For other systems mechanisms are often still a matter of controversy even in the case of small radicals (Section 2.3.6.2). There are at least three mechanisms whereby the solvent might modify the outcome of a radical process ... 

Free-radical substitution at an aromatic carbon seldom takes place by a mechanism in which a hydrogen is abstracted to give an aryl radical. Reactivity considerations here are similar to those in Chapters 11 and 13 that is, we need to know which position on the ring will be attacked to give the intermediate... 

The results of chain transfer studies with different polymer radicals are compared in Table XIV. Chain transfer constants with hydrocarbon solvents are consistently a little greater for methyl methacrylate radicals than for styrene radicals. The methyl methacrylate chain radical is far less effective in the removal of chlorine from chlorinated solvents, however. Vinyl acetate chains are much more susceptible to chain transfer than are either of the other two polymer radicals. As will appear later, the propagation constants kp for styrene, methyl methacrylate, and vinyl acetate are in the approximate ratio 1 2 20. It follows from the transfer constants with toluene, that the rate constants ktr,s for the removal of benzylic hydrogen by the respective chain radicals are in the ratio 1 3.5 6000. Chain transfer studies offer a convenient means for comparing radical reactivities, provided the absolute propagation constants also are known. 

The early studies of the chemical effects of ultrasound have been thoroughly reviewed (5-7). Only the most important and most recent research is mentioned here as needed to provide a perspective on sonochemical reactivity patterns. The sonolysis of water is the earliest and most exhaustively studied (3,93,96,98-105). The first observations on the experimental parameters which influence sonochemistry come from these reports. The primary products are H202 and H2, and various data supported their formation from the intermediacy of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen radicals ... 

The rate of this intramolecular isomerization depends on the chain length, with the maximum in the case of a six-atomic transition state, i.e., when the tertiary C—H bond is in the (3-position with respect to the peroxyl group [13]. For the values of rate constants of intramolecular attack on the tertiary and secondary C—H bond, see Table 2.9. The parameters of peroxyl radical reactivity in reactions of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen atom abstraction are compared and discussed in Chapter 6. 

As an example, the propagation steps for the reductive alkylation of alkenes are shown in Scheme 7.1. For an efficient chain process, it is important (i) that the RjSi radical reacts faster with RZ (the precursor of radical R ) than with the alkene, and (ii) that the alkyl radical reacts faster with the alkene (to form the adduct radical) than with the silicon hydride. In other words, the intermediates must be disciplined, a term introduced by D. H. R. Barton to indicate the control of radical reactivity [5]. Therefore, a synthetic plan must include the task of considering kinetic data or substituent influence on the selectivity of radicals. The reader should note that the hydrogen donation step controls the radical sequence and that the concentration of silicon hydride often serves as the variable by which the product distribution can be influenced. 

Hydrogen bonding between an ion-radical and solvent may also enhance the ion-radical reactivity. Thns, the formation of hydrogen bond between methanol and the p-diketone cation-radical accelerates its deprotonation according to Scheme 5.14 (Jiao et al. 2007). 

The propagation step, Eq. (4), is much slower than Eq. (3) as an example, its rate constant kp is 0.18 M 1 sec-1 for cumene at 303K. Values of kp can vary considerably for different substrates, as shown by the oxidation rates of substituted toluenes (8). With respect to toluene, taken as 1.0, the reactivity of 4-nitrotoluene toward ROO is 0.33 and that of / -xylene is 1.6. A homolytic process like the fission of the C-H bond should be essentially apolar, but data for substituted toluenes correctly suggest that the hydrogen radical abstraction is favored by electron-donor substituents and that in the transition state the carbon atom involved has a partial positive charge. The difference in kp between different molecules or different groups of the same molecule is the reason of the selectivity of autoxidation. 

Hydroxyl group The combined oxygen and hydrogen radical (-OH) that forms the reactive group in polyols. 

The free-radical reaction of propane with bromine. This 97 3 ratio of products shows that bromine abstracts a secondary hydrogen 97 times as rapidly as a primary hydrogen. Bromination (reactivity ratio 97 1) is much more selective than chlorination (reactivity ratio 4.5 1). 

The hydrogen atom abstraction from oxalic acid by DPPH (Table 2, Singh et al., 1966) has already been commented upon. Carboxylic acids seem to be unsuitable models for studying radical reactivities of O—H bonds. 

---