Hydrogen orbitals and

We must now consider the choice of a basis set. I have already made reference to hydrogenic orbitals and Slater orbitals without any real explanation. I have also hinted at the integrals problem variational calculations almost always involve the calculation of a number of two-electron integrals over the basis functions... 

Although structures involving methyl groups bonded simultaneously to two carbon atoms by means of an overlap between the hydrogen orbitals and the />-orbitals of the carbon atoms may be readily enough assimilated, the state of structural theory is such that most of the cyclic intermediate or transition state structures are dubbed non-classical. In many cases they are best depicted by molecular orbitals, usually by diagramming the component atomic orbitals in the best position for overlap. Since maximum overlap of the component atomic orbitals imposes certain geometric requirements, pre-... 

The CHO radical is a o-radical and the main qualitative feature of the comparison between Tables 2 and 3 is the tendency for the a GHOs to be less contracted in CHO than is found in CH20. In particular, the sp2 hybrid on carbon which nominally contains the unpaired electron is considerably expanded (exponent 1.5923 compared to 1.8660 in CH20). The hydrogen orbital and the aoc orbital are also noticeably expanded while the lone pairs on oxygen are largely unaffected. 

Each B-H-B three-center two-electron bridge bond corresponds to a filled three-center localized bonding orbital requiring the hydrogen orbital and one hybrid orbital from each boron atom. 

Hyperspherical harmonics are now explicitly considered as expansion basis sets for atomic and molecular orbitals. In this treatment the key role is played by a generalization of the famous Fock projection [5] for hydrogen atom in momentum space, leading to the connection between hydrogenic orbitals and four-dimensional harmonics, as we have seen in the previous section. It is well known that the hyperspherical harmonics are a basis for the irreducible representations of the rotational group on the four-dimensional hypersphere from this viewpoint hydrogenoid orbitals can be looked at as representations of the four-dimensional hyperspherical symmetry [14]. 

The hydrogen molecule-ion, H2 , can be regarded as having one electron in a vapor state by spectroscopic means and found to have a dissociation energy to H and H- of 61 kcal mole-1 compared to the 104.2 kcal mole-1 bond energy for H2. Several possible combinations of two hydrogen orbitals and from one to four electrons are shown in Figure 6-6(b). 

In closing this section, a discussion of basis sets is in order. Almost all ab initio and DFT calculations require the use of a basis set, a set of functions in terms of which the molecular orbitals are constructed. In almost all cases, the functions chosen are atom-centered functions designed to mimic the shape of atomic orbitals. It is known that orbitals for many-electron atoms resemble the hydrogenic orbitals, and it is also observed that molecular orbitals can be expanded very efficiently in terms of atomic orbitals. One might think that a relatively small set of functions, essentially the optimized occupied atomic orbitals of the atoms making up the system, could be used... 

Relative sizes of hydrogenic orbitals and the probability criterion... 

Although ethylene has similar 0 orbitals, these are not only appreciably different in energy from the n orbital of ethylene, but the overlap between the hydrogen orbitals and the ethylene n orbitals is smaller upon bending both effects cause much less mixing of these orbitals upon deplanarization of ethylene. 

As a first illustration of the procedure, consider B4H10 (Fig. 13). Electron-pair bonds to six hydrogen atoms, and three-center bonds to the four bridge hydrogens, employ ten electron pairs out of the total of eleven. These ten pairs also use up all of the hydrogen orbitals and all but two of the boron orbitals, one on each Bi. Thus we have one electron pair for two boron orbitals which are directed toward each other and hence form a single electron-pair bond between atoms Bi. 

I) The first corresponds to bonding orbitals between the three Is hydrogen orbitals and the one 2s orbital on carbon and two of the 2p orbitals, respectively, leaving the third 2p orbital unhybridized and yielding a planar structure. These bonding orbitals are shown in the next figure as a-d,respec-... 

We now have two localized bonding orbitals, each one of which is made with a 2sp hybrid orbital on the Be atom and a Is hydrogen orbital, and is roughly the same as one of the orbitals in Eqs. (21.1-1) and (21.1-2). Each of these space orbitals is occupied by two electrons, making two single bonds between the Be atom and the two H atoms. 

Describe two ways in which the orbitals of multielectron atoms resemble hydrogen orbitals and two ways in which they differ from hydrogen orbitals. 

The four carbon orbitals are sp hybrid orbitals (purple). Those of the hydrogen atoms (yellow) are Is. The structure is tetrahedral, with H — C—H bond angles of 109.5° (more precisely, 109.471°). Remember that the hydrogen orbitals and the carbon hybrid orbitals have the same phase, but we have colored the hydrogen orbitals yellow for clarity. 

In Table 5.1, we have also listed the molecular integrals needed for the evaluation of the electronic energy at the experimental equilibrium distance and at infinite separation. These integrals have been obtained using special techniques for many-centre integrals over hydrogenic orbitals and should be taken at face value. In Chapter 9. we shall develop techniques appropriate for... 

---