Hydrogen bonding complex concentration

The differences between 172°caic and r/2°comp are probably caused by the changes in the reaction media. In unpolar media, alcohols form telomeric, hydrogen bonded complexes (rings or chains) whose nature depend on the concentration(s) and the type of alcohol(s) [51]. When a competition experiment is compared to the addition of a single alcohol either the overall alcohol concentration can be chosen identical, or each alcohol concentration may be the same leading to a higher overall concentration. Indeed, in each case different selectivities were found [15]. 

The hydrogen-bonded complexes A-H—-B and A —H-B can be formed readily if A and B are oxygen or nitrogen bases such as - COO , - OH, - NH2, or imidazole. In such cases, as in ice, the interconversion of the two complexes (step b in Eq. 9-97) is very fast. The overall rate of the proton transfer will then be limited by diffusion of B and H-A together or by diffusion of A and H-B apart. It might seem that these two processes should also both be very fast. However, the rates will be determined by the concentration ratio [A-H—B]/[A—-H-B]. If [A-H—B] equals [A— H-B] the rate of dissociation of A-H-B will be half what it is if nearly all of the complex is A—H-B. If A-H—B predominates by 1000 to 1, the rate will be slowed much more. 

In solvents where there is no formation of the phenolate anion ArO-, only the direct ko path is possible. Although simple second-order kinetics are expected in such solvents, first order in [ArOH] andin [Y ],the denominator of the expected rate law (Equation 4.21 derived from Equation 4.20) includes a term acknowledging the equilibrium formation of the hydrogen-bonded complex which depletes the concentration of the free phenol ... 

Fig. 29. The formation of intermacromolecular complex through hydrogen bonds in concentrated solutions of poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)17S)...

As is seen from the data in Table 4, upon treatment of the carbon surface with hydrogen, the value of its free surface energy sharply decreases. This agrees with the notion that such a treatment results in a decrease in the surface concentration of oxidized carbon atoms that form hydrogen-bonded complexes with water molecules. Besides, a sharp decrease in the concentration of water in the adsorbent micropores is also observed. This effect can be explained by lower accessibility of micropores for water molecules caused by deteriorating hydrophilic properties of the adsorbent surface. When a carbon surface is treated with hydrogen peroxide, we observe an increase in the bound water concentration at the expense of the creation of new oxidized sites that would form hydrogen-bonded complexes with water molecules. 

Hydration properties of the adsorbent surface at the adsorbent-water interface can be most completely expressed in terms of the free surface energy. From the data in Tables 6 and 7 It follows that in the case when the carbon deposition time does not exceed 3 h the increases in the carbon content are accompanied by decreases in the free surface energy. The minimum value of AG was recorded for sample CS6 (AGv = 72 mJ/m ). This is in agreement with the statement that the hydration properties of the surface are determined by the concentration of primary adsorption sites that can form hydrogen-bonded complexes with water molecules. 

Most thermodynamic studies of the equilibria between hydrogen-bonded complexes of phenols and their free component molecules have been conducted in a diluting solvent. Binary solutions of phenols (phenol o-cresol ) in the pure base propionitrile have also been studied by means of Raman and IrW3,i44 spectrometry. Factor analysis of the v(C=N) band indicates the formation of a 1 1 complex over a large concentration range. However, this procedure is not recommended for the determination of equilibrium constants because these exhibit a strong concentration dependence. 

---