Hydrodynamic relaxation times

The droplet dynamics can also be analyzed in the perspective of the evolving crmtact angles at its advancing and receding ends, 0a and 0r, respectively. To analyze the situation, one may first note that for typical micro-capiUaries, the Reynolds number is typically very small ( l for a 10 pm-diameter capillary handling water at a mean speed of 1 cm/s, as an example), which also implies that the hydrodynamic relaxation time of the fluid system is small enough to treat the interfacial regions to be in local electromechanical equilibrium. For the case of a cylindrical... 

With 14 5-10 and 1000, the hydrodynamic relaxation time can be interpreted as an Eulerian integral time scale... 

In the hydrodynamic limit one considers only those variables whose relaxation times decrease with increasing wavevector of the corresponding visco-elastic modes. For instance, a small vortex made by a spoon in a glass of tea relaxes faster than a whirl in a river, or, after a tempest, short waves at the sea surface disappear faster then waves with a large period. The relaxation of cyclones in atmosphere takes days or weeks. As a rule, the hydrodynamic relaxation times follow the law x Aq. The strings of a guitar also obey the same law. 

The volume flow through the capillary is characterised by a hydrodynamic relaxation time... 

When the characteristic time of the pressure change is larger than the hydrodynamic relaxation time (or the oscillation frequency is small / (t, ) ) the quasi-stationary approximation holds... 

The relation between the microscopic friction acting on a molecule during its motion in a solvent enviromnent and macroscopic bulk solvent viscosity is a key problem affecting the rates of many reactions in condensed phase. The sequence of steps leading from friction to diflfiision coefficient to viscosity is based on the general validity of the Stokes-Einstein relation and the concept of describing friction by hydrodynamic as opposed to microscopic models involving local solvent structure. In the hydrodynamic limit the effect of solvent friction on, for example, rotational relaxation times of a solute molecule is [ ]... 

Before turning to dynamics, we should hke to point out that, because no solvent is explicitly included, the Rouse model [37,38] (rather than the Zimm model [39]) results in the dilute limit, as there is no hydrodynamic interaction. The rate of reorientation of monomers per unit time is W, and the relaxation time of a chain scales as [26,38]... 

Equation (23) predicts a dependence of xR on M2. Experimentally, it was found that the relaxation time for flexible polymer chains in dilute solutions obeys a different scaling law, i.e. t M3/2. The Rouse model does not consider excluded volume effects or polymer-solvent interactions, it assumes a Gaussian behavior for the chain conformation even when distorted by the flow. Its domain of validity is therefore limited to modest deformations under 0-conditions. The weakest point, however, was neglecting hydrodynamic interaction which will now be discussed. 

The Zimm model predicts correctly the experimental scaling exponent xx ss M3/2 determined in dilute solutions under 0-conditions. In concentrated solution and melts, the hydrodynamic interaction between the polymer segments of the same chain is screened by the host molecules (Eq. 28) and a flexible polymer coil behaves much like a free-draining chain with a Rouse spectrum in the relaxation times. 

As coils become more expanded, the hydrodynamic interaction decreases this is reflected in the Zimm relaxation time which approaches the Rouse value in good solvent. 

First approaches to approximating the relaxation time on the basis of molecular parameters can be traced back to Rouse [33]. The model is based on a number of boundary assumptions (1) the solution is ideally dilute, i.e. intermolecular interactions are negligible (2) hydrodynamic interactions due to disturbance of the medium velocity by segments of the same chain are negligible and (3) the connector tension F(r) obeys an ideal Hookean force law. 

The range of semi-dilute network solutions is characterised by (1) polymer-polymer interactions which lead to a coil shrinkage (2) each blob acts as individual unit with both hydrodynamic and excluded volume effects and (3) for blobs in the same chain all interactions are screened out (the word blob denotes the portion of chain between two entanglements points). In this concentration range the flow characteristics and therefore also the relaxation time behaviour are not solely governed by the molar mass of the sample and its concentration, but also by the thermodynamic quality of the solvent. This leads to a shift factor, hm°d, is a function of the molar mass, concentration and solvent power. 

The equations of motion (75) can also be solved for polymers in good solvents. Averaging the Oseen tensor over the equilibrium segment distribution then gives = l/ n — m Y t 1 = p3v/rz and Dz kBT/r sNY are obtained for the relaxation times and the diffusion constant. The same relations as (80) and (82) follow as a function of the end-to-end distance with slightly altered numerical factors. In the same way, a solution of equations of motion (75), without any orientational averaging of the hydrodynamic field, merely leads to slightly modified numerical factors [35], In conclusion, Table 4 summarizes the essential assertions for the Zimm and Rouse model and compares them. 

Different equilibrium, hydrodynamic, and dynamic properties are subsequently obtained. Thus, the time-correlation function of the stress tensor (corresponding to any crossed-coordinates component of the stress tensor) is obtained as a sum over all the exponential decays of the Rouse modes. Similarly, M[rj] is shown to be proportional to the sum of all the Rouse relaxation times. In the ZK formulation [83], the connectivity matrix A is built to describe a uniform star chain. An (f-l)-fold degeneration is found in this case for the f-inde-pendent odd modes. Viscosity results from the ZK method have been described already in the present text. 

Since l is proportional to and q is proportional to 1/L, i is proportional to. Substitution of Eq. (67) into Eq.(62) gives the Langevin equation for the Rouse modes of the chain within the approximations of preaveraging for hydrodynamic interactions and mode-mode decoupling for intersegment potential interactions. Equation (62) yields the following results for relaxation times and various dynamical correlation functions. 

Dielectric dispersion measurements also provide a means of determining rotational diffusion coefficients or mean rotational relaxation times of solute molecules. In principle, data for these hydrodynamic quantities can be used for a... 

When there is no tangential force (or no transmission of angular momentum) across the liquid—sphere interface, the sphere slips within the liquid. Within the hydrodynamic theory, the rotational relaxation time is negligible for an inertialess slippery sphere. A variable coefficient of slip (or stick), j3, may be introduced. As 3 tends from 0 to 00 the rotational relaxation time increases from 0 to r)V/kT [221, 222]. 

When the solute molecules are significantly larger than the solvent molecules, the detailed motion of individual solvent molecules around a solute molecule matters less the solvent may be better approximated as a hydrodynamic continuum. Both the velocity relaxation time Tiei = mj Girrja and the velocity autocorrelation time rc are larger for larger solute... 

In this chapter, the motion of solute and solvent molecules is considered in rather more detail. Previously, it has been emphasised that this motion approximates to diffusion only over times which are long compared with the velocity relaxation time (see Chap. 8, Sect. 2.1). At times comparable with or a little longer than the velocity relaxation time, the diffusion equation does not provide a satisfactory description of molecular motion. An alternative approach must be sought. This introduces considerable complications to a theoretical analysis of very fast reactions in solution. To develop an understanding of chemical reactions occurring over very short time intervals, several points need to be discussed. Which reactions might be of interest and over what time scale What is known of the molecular motion of solute and solvent molecules Why does the Markovian (hydrodynamic) continuum analysis fail and what needs to be done to develop a better theory These points will be considered in further detail in this chapter. 

With a finite value of necessarily some intramolecular hydrodynamic interaction or shielding must occur. The importance of eq. (3.53) lies at the present time, in the fact that it can be adapted for concentrated, solvent free systems like polymer melts. As Bueche (13) pointed out, in these systems every chain molecule is surrounded by chain molecules of the same sort. As all these molecules are necessarily equivalent, one cannot speak of a hydrodynamic shielding effect. This would imply that certain chains are permanently immobilized within the coils of other chains. The contrary is expected, viz. that the centre of gravity of each chain wiH independently foHow, in the average, the affine deformation of the medium as a continuum. From this reasoning Bueche deduces that the free-draining case should be applicable to polymer melts. Eq. (3.53) is then used (after omission of rj0) for the evaluation of an apparent friction factor . After introduction of this apparent friction factor into eq. (3.50), the set of relaxation times reads ... 

---