Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Highly variable drugs ratio

If safety data suggest a narrow therapeutic ratio, highly variable pharmacokinetics may be unacceptable and could ultimately result in a decision to discontinue the drug from development. [Pg.81]

A retrospective study in a 73-patient cohort showed that the addition of amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic medication, resulted in highly variable changes in warfarin dose requirements. Metabolites of amiodarone in human plasma were quantified by a liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry assay, and inhibition constants (Kj) were determined for the inhibition of (S)-warfarin 7-hydroxlylation in human liver micro-somes. By calculating the ratios of unboxmd plasma concentrations to the microsomal Kj for the unbound drug, a minor metabolite of amiodarone, N,N-didesethylamiodarone, was identified as a major contributor to the interaction between amiodarone and warfarin [11 ]. [Pg.530]

Figure 4.52. Coefficients of variation that reflect both tablet to tablet and analytical variability. For formulation B, particularly strengths 2 and 3, the drop in CV with higher cumulative release (a - b) is marked, cf. Fig, 4.50. When the dissolution rate is high, individual differences dominate, while towards the end analytical uncertainty is all that remains. The very low CVs obtained with strength 3 of formulation A ( 0.7-0.8%, data offset by +10% for clarity) are indicative of the analytical uncertainty. Because content uniformity is harder to achieve the lower the drug-to-excipient ratio, this pattern is not unexpected. Figure 4.52. Coefficients of variation that reflect both tablet to tablet and analytical variability. For formulation B, particularly strengths 2 and 3, the drop in CV with higher cumulative release (a - b) is marked, cf. Fig, 4.50. When the dissolution rate is high, individual differences dominate, while towards the end analytical uncertainty is all that remains. The very low CVs obtained with strength 3 of formulation A ( 0.7-0.8%, data offset by +10% for clarity) are indicative of the analytical uncertainty. Because content uniformity is harder to achieve the lower the drug-to-excipient ratio, this pattern is not unexpected.

See other pages where Highly variable drugs ratio is mentioned: [Pg.430]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.1274]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.1432]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.1202]    [Pg.3647]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.2287]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.2270]    [Pg.45]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.26 ]




SEARCH



Highly variable drugs

Variables ratio

© 2024 chempedia.info