Heisenberg Calculations

In the following sections results will be reported of conjugated circuit calculations on a variety of fullerenes, of Heisenberg calculations on buckminsterfullerene, some of its isomers and derivatives, and a few smaller fullerenes, and of Hubbard/PPP calculations primarily on buckminsterfullerene, while attempting to emphasize both the strengths and the limitations of the VB picture of these molecules. 

The physical interpretation of the quantum mechanics and its generalization to include aperiodic phenomena have been the subject of papers by Dirac, Jordan, Heisenberg, and other authors. For our purpose, the calculation of the properties of molecules in stationary states and particularly in the normal state, the consideration of the Schrodinger wave equation alone suffices, and it will not be necessary to discuss the extended theory. 

In the 1920s it was found that electrons do not behave like macroscopic objects that are governed by Newton s laws of motion rather, they obey the laws of quantum mechanics. The application of these laws to atoms and molecules gave rise to orbital-based models of chemical bonding. In Chapter 3 we discuss some of the basic ideas of quantum mechanics, particularly the Pauli principle, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and the concept of electronic charge distribution, and we give a brief review of orbital-based models and modem ab initio calculations based on them. 

As a simple model, we confine our attention just to a single mode Ha(t) of the Hamiltonian (23). Note that neither any instantaneous eigenstate of Ha(t) is an exact quantum state nor e-/3ii W is a density operator. To calculate the thermal expectation value of an operator A, one needs either the Heisenberg operator Ah or the density operator pa(t) = UapaUa Now we use the time-dependent creation and annihilation operators (24), invariant operators, to construct the Fock space. 

Various predictive methods based on molecular graphs of Jt-systems as described in Section 3 have been critically compared by Klein (Klein et al., 1989) and can be extended to more quantitative treatments. In principle, the effective exchange integrals /ab in the Heisenberg Hamiltonian (4) for the interaction of localized electron spins at sites a and b are calculated as the difference in energies of the high-spin and low-spin states. It was Hoffmann who first tried to calculate the dependence of the M—L—M bond... 

The spin distribution in the lower homologue [15 w = 2] was most elegantly studied by Takui et al. (1989) by means of a combination of ENDOR experiments and theoretical calculations within the framework of a generalized UHF Hubbard model (Teki et al., 1987a) and a Heisenberg model (Teki et al., 1987b). The spin distribution obtained is just as expected qualitatively in Fig. 7. 

In a mixed quantum-classical calculation the trace operation in the Heisenberg representation is replaced by a quantum-mechanical trace (tTq) over the quantum degrees of freedom and a classical trace (i.e., a phase-space integral over the initial positions xq and momenta Po) over the classical degrees of freedom. This yields... 

Some historians think that Heisenberg may have deliberately dragged his feet so as not to deliver the bomb into HMei s hands. Others feel he may simply have been hindered by mistakes in his calculations. We may never know for sure what Heisenberg s intentions were. The issue is explored with great ingenuity in Michael Frayn s 1998 play Copenhagen (London Methuen). 

Nevertheless, the calculation of is an important issue. In experiment, it is considered as an empirical parameter fitted to experimental data so that the corresponding Heisenberg Hamiltonian describes the experimentally observed magnetic behavior (100,101). Although it would be more desirable from a quantum chemical point of view to directly calculate experimentally accessible properties, e.g., the magnetic susceptibility (102), the quantum chemical calculation of Ky provides a means to compare experimental and calculated results—though in a somewhat indirect fashion. 

In molecules, the interaction of surrogate spins localized at the atomic centers is calculated describing a picture of spin-spin interaction of atoms. This picture became prominent for the description of the magnetic behavior of transition-metal clusters, where the coupling type (parallel or antiparallel) of surrogate spins localized at the metal centers is of interest. Once such a description is available it is possible to analyze any wave function with respect to the coupling type between the metal centers. Then, local spin operators can be employed in the Heisenberg Spin Hamiltonian. An overview over wave-function analyses for open-shell molecules with respect to local spins can be found in Ref. (118). 

The Heisenberg exchange coupling constants J can be calculated from the BS DFT solutions utilizing the approaches of Noodleman (87), Ruiz (116), or Yamaguchi (117—119), which differ in the assumptions made regarding the strength of the... 

In view of this difficulty, verifiable statements about measured physical quantities cannot be made with unlimited exactness, but always imply an uncertainty. Nevertheless, from a large number of individual measurements one can arrive by statistical analysis at values that have a high probability of being correct and this probability can also be calculated. Properly speaking, then, any distance from the nucleus is possible for the electron however, some distances are more probable than others and there is also a most probable distance. The discovery of Heisenberg thus forces us into devising a theory that not only makes pertinent predictions but at the same time qualifies these predictions by stating a probability that the expectation is observed. 

When the mass m of an object is relatively large, as is true in daily life, then both Ax and Av in the Heisenberg relationship can be very small. We therefore have no apparent problem in measuring both position and velocity for visible objects. The problem arises only on the atomic scale. Worked Example 5.6 gives a sample calculation. 

When kT is large with respect to the energy gap, the population of each level is just one over the number of levels or functions. When kT is small with respect to the energy separation, then only the lowest level is occupied. The new energy levels S are linear combinations of the S, Ms > functions of each metal ion. The functions and energies can be calculated by the simple Heisenberg Hamiltonian, that for a dimer is... 

Following the development of quantum theory by Heisenberg [1] and Schrodinger [2] and a few further discoveries, the basic principles of the structure of atoms and molecules were described around 1930. Unfortunately, the complexity of the Schrodinger equation increases dramatically with the number of electrons involved in a system, and thus for a long time the hydrogen and helium atoms and simple molecules as H2 were the only species whose properties could really be calculated from these first principles. In 1929, Dirac [3] wrote ... 

---