Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Heavy system

Algal biomass and the resultant heavy system fouling that can occur... [Pg.212]

As should be evident from various chapters in this volume, the theoretical description of NMR shieldings and chemical shifts has seen a tremendous development during the past few years, and a number of methods are now at a point to be truly useful to experimental researchers as well as to answer fundamental questions. DFT based methods are a major aspect of these developments. The particular strength of DFT is perhaps its computational expedience, paired with accuracy and reliability. Hence, DFT applications are particularly useful for large and/or heavy systems including metal complexes or biological molecules. [Pg.111]

Another contribution due to nuclear properties is the so-called recoil contribution. It takes into account the finite mass of the nucleus even beyond the non-relativistic reduced mass approximation. Up to now there is a lack of calculations non-perturbatively in (Za) which exist only for the QED corrections of order (a/n) up to now but would definitely be required for heavy systems. [Pg.607]

When our present group became interested in quasi-molecules, which are generated in atomic collision systems, we started to use the relativistic DV Xa-method. With the help of Arne Rosen we were the first to calculate correlation diagrams of relatively heavy systems. ... [Pg.109]

K. Nobusada, O.I. Tolstikhin, andH. Nakamura, Quantum mechanical elucidation of reaction mechanisms of heavy-light-heavy systems Role of potential ridge. J. Chem. Phys., 108 8922-8930,1998. [Pg.144]

The fact that ground-state mixing has an effect smaller than electron relaxation or Breit, qed, and nuc effects confirms that in these systems, inner-core correlation is overcome by electron relaxation and, for heavy systems, relativity effects [6,8]. However, it has been seen earlier (Table 2), the closer the ionized level is to the ground state, the less it is increased by gsm. [Pg.226]

Much work has been done in this field by Zeiri and Shapiro, and subsequently by others. For example, semi-empirical potential surfaces have been reported for the alkali atom (M = Li, Na, K, Rb) and halogen molecule (XY = F2,Cl2,Br2,l2) reactions . In this model, the three valence orbitals were represented by Slater-type orbitals centred on M, X and Y. Three VB structures were used a covalent structure based on the spatial configuration MXY and two ionic structures based on M X Y and M XY . The full Hamiltonian was written as a sum of diatomic and atomic terms, but, contrary to the DIM formalism, only the ground-state potentials were required. The approach of Zeiri and Shapiro is very cheap and can be applied to heavy systems. [Pg.376]

The original version of the FD HF program employed one grid of points of constant density to represent all orbitals and potentials. In the case of heavy systems where both tightly contracted atomic-like core orbitals and rather diffused, valence, orbitals are present this restriction has to be relaxed. Recently the multiple grids in variable have been introduced which allow to further reduce the number of grid points (19). [Pg.4]

The most accurate calculations of the SE correction were carried out in Mohr (1974a, 1992) and in Indelicato and Mohr (1998) for the point nucleus, and in Mohr and Soff (1993) for the extended nucleus. For heavy systems (Z > 50) the dependence of the self-energy correction FSE on the nuclear radius R also Ahas to be taken into account (Soff 1993). [Pg.45]

In order to show that transformed Hamiltonians are useful even for very heavy systems, numerous case studies have been carried out in the last decade. Due to space limitations, only a small number can be reviewed explicitly. [Pg.101]

Thus we conclude that the light systems mainly determine the repulsive wall of the potential whereas the heavy systems are mainly sensitive to the attractive well. We shall discuss the results for these systems in order of decreasing experimental material. [Pg.362]

The picture change effect has been also found to be quite large for dipole moment derivatives with respect to nuclear coordinates. The same can be expected in the case of the dipole polarizabilities derivatives [15]. These findings show that two-component calculations of infrared and Raman intensifies for heavy systems need to take into account the picture change of the relevant operators. It should be mentioned that for both derivatives the operator which is responsible for the large picture change effect is the intramolecular electric field at the heavy nucleus. [Pg.124]

It is also appropriate to mention that the picture change problem is by no means restricted to one-electron operators, although the way of phrasing it in the case of the Coulomb repulsion terms is usually somewhat different from the one presented here. For instance, Sucher [61] considered the modification of the Coulomb repulsion operator caused by the no-pair approximation. The expression he derived is simply the interaction operator in the very approximate two-component formalism. This form of the Coulomb interaction operator was also investigated by Samzow et al. [62]. They found that for valence orbitals of heavy systems the corresponding modification of two-electron integrals is relatively small. [Pg.124]

Most of the developments described above occurred before the advent of the electron in chemistry. Then came the golden years of wave mechanics with one-electron wave functions (orbitals), the Pauli principle, the building-up principle (Ai auprinzip) and, even before the end of the 1920s, the idea that chemistry had now become a question of computation was proposed. Not many years later the best conceivable method of describing atomic and molecular systems in terms of fixed orbitals with one or two electrons in each was invented and named the Hartree-Fock description. The s pearance of electronic computers made the method practical for heavy systems, such as atomic 3d transition-metal ions, as early as about 1960. The results for d spectra were enthusiastically received, mainly b use it was wonderful to see that such calculations could actually be done. On second thought and on further development of computational chemistry, the orbitad or one-electron picture of chemistry became... [Pg.219]


See other pages where Heavy system is mentioned: [Pg.121]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.6113]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.800]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.6112]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.911]    [Pg.915]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.226]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 , Pg.485 , Pg.516 , Pg.531 , Pg.532 ]




SEARCH



Aeppli and C. Broholm, Magnetic correlations in heavy-fermion systems neutron scattering from single crystals

Cardiovascular system heavy metals

Electrical resistivity, heavy electron systems

Heavies separation systems

Heavy Fermion Systems as Ternary Intermetallics with Extraordinary Properties

Heavy assault bridge system

Heavy equipment manufacturers systems

Heavy hydrocarbon pyrolysis systems

Heavy-electron systems

Heavy-fermion systems

K.H. Fischer, Valence-fluctuation and heavy-fermion 4f systems

Magnetic correlations in heavy-fermion systems

Magnetism, heavy electron systems

Magnetism, heavy electron systems metals

Neutron in heavy-fermion systems

Phenomenological approach to heavy-fermion systems

Superconductivity, heavy-electron systems

© 2024 chempedia.info