Hartree-Fock theory energy

As we have seen throughout this book, the Hartree-Fock method provides a reasonable model for a wide range of problems and molecular systems. However, Hartree-Fock theory also has limitations. They arise principally from the fact that Hartree-Fock theory does not include a full treatment of the effects of electron correlation the energy contributions arising from electrons interacting with one another. For systems and situations where such effects are important, Hartree-Fock results may not be satisfactory. The theory and methodology underlying electron correlation is discussed in Appendix A. 

When we consider the predicted atomization energy, however, we see vast differences among the functionals. Like Hartree-Fock theory, the SVWN and SVWN5 functionals are completely inadequate for predicting this system s atomization energy (which is not an atypical result). The BLYP value is also quite poor. 

The Hartree-Fock values range firom good to quite poor. For the first reaction, cancellation of errors allows Hartree-Fock theory to predict a good value for AH (it overestimates the energies for both ethane and acetone, and underestimates the one for acetaldehyde). 

The problem has now become how to solve for the set of molecular orbital expansion coefficients, c. . Hartree-Fock theory takes advantage of the variational principle, which says that for the ground state of any antisymmetric normalized function of the electronic coordinates, which we will denote H, then the expectation value for the energy corresponding to E will always be greater than the energy for the exact wave function ... 

With the exception of very large systems, e.g., polymer strands (Chapter 18) and polypeptides and polynucleotides (Chapter 16), all calculations have been carried out using ab initio Hartree-Fock theory with the 3-21G basis seF. The perfomance of this technique with regard to the calculation of geometries, relative energies, dipole moments and vibrational frequencies has been extensively documented. ... 

A great failing of the Hiickel models is their treatment of electron repulsion. Electron repulsion is not treated explicitly it is somehow averaged within the spirit of Hartree-Fock theory. 1 gave you a Hiickel jr-electron treatment of pyridine in Chapter 7. Orbital energies are shown in Table 8.1. 

Equilibrium geometries, dissociation energies, and energy separations between electronic states of different spin multiplicities are described substantially better by Mpller-Plesset theory to second or third order than by Hartree-Fock theory. 

The exchange-correlation energy density can be split into two parts exchange component Ex n) and correlation component e Cn). The explicit expression for the exchange component is known from Hartree-Fock theory but the correlation component is known only numerically. Several parametrisations exist for the exchange-correlation energy and potential of a homogeneous gas system which can be used for the LDA calculations within DFT. 

Finally, we should note Koopmans theorem (Koopmans, 1934) which provides a physical interpretation of the orbital energies e from equation (1-24) it states that the orbital energy e obtained from Hartree-Fock theory is an approximation of minus the ionization energy associated with the removal of an electron from that particular orbital i. e., 8 = EN - Ey.j = —IE(i). The simple proof of this theorem can be found in any quantum chemistry textbook. 

What does this mean We have replaced the non-local and therefore fairly complicated exchange term of Hartree-Fock theory as given in equation (3-3) by a simple approximate expression which depends only on the local values of the electron density. Thus, this expression represents a density functional for the exchange energy. As noted above, this formula was originally explicitly derived as an approximation to the HF scheme, without any reference to density functional theory. To improve the quality of this approximation an adjustable, semiempirical parameter a was introduced into the pre-factor Cx which leads to the Xa or Hartree-Fock-Slater (HFS) method which enjoyed a significant amount of popularity among physicists, but never had much impact in chemistry,... 

The technique used to extract the wave function in this work is conceptually simple the wave function obtained is a single determinant which reproduces the observed experimental data to the desired accuracy, while minimising the Hartree-Fock (HF) energy. The idea is closely related to some interesting recent work by Zhao et al. [1]. These authors have obtained the Kohn-Sham single determinant wave function of density functional theory (DFT) from a theoretical electron density. 

For most molecules studied, modest Hartree-Fock calculations yield remarkably accurate barriers that allow confident prediction of the lowest energy conformer in the S0 and D0 states. The simplest level of theory that predicts barriers in good agreement with experiment is HF/6-31G for the closed-shell S0 state (Hartree-Fock theory) and UHF/6-31G for the open-shell D0 state (unrestricted Hartree-Fock theory). The 6-31G basis set has double-zeta quality, with split valence plus d-type polarization on heavy atoms. This is quite modest by current standards. Nevertheless, such calculations reproduce experimental barrier heights within 10%. 

DFT has come to the fore in molecular calculations as providing a relatively cheap and effective method for including important correlation effects in the initial and final states. ADFT methods have been used, but by far the most popular approach is that based on Slater s half electron transition state theory [73] and its developments. Unlike Hartree-Fock theory, DFT has no Koopmans theorem that relates the orbital energies to an ionisation potential, instead it has been shown that the orbital energy (e,) is related to the gradient of the total energy E(N) of an N-electron system, with respect to the occupation number of the 2th orbital ( , ) [74],... 

The difference between the Hartree-Fock energy and the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation (Figure 60), the so-called correlation energy, can be calculated approximately within the Hartree-Fock theory by the configuration interaction method (Cl) or by a perturbation theoretical approach (Mpller-Plesset perturbation calculation wth order, MPn). Within a Cl calculation the wave function is composed of a linear combination of different Slater determinants. Excited-state Slater determinants are then generated by exciting electrons from the filled SCF orbitals to the virtual ones ... 

An initial equilibrium structure is obtained at the Hartree-Fock (HF) level with the 6-31G(d) basis [47]. Spin-restricted (RHF) theory is used for singlet states and spin-unrestricted Hartree-Fock theory (UHF) for others. The HF/6-31G(d) equilibrium structure is used to calculate harmonic frequencies, which are then scaled by a factor of 0.8929 to take account of known deficiencies at this level [48], These frequencies are used to evaluate the zero-point energy Ezpe and thermal effects. 

The usual first ah initio approximation to the wave function leads to the Hartree-Fock theory, where V molecular spin orbitals (. with one for each electron. Then, asking the question what is the single determinant solution with the lowest possible energy, we obtain the Hartree-Fock equations and density, ... 

Hartree-Fock energy 227 Hartree-Fock molecular orbitals 224 Hartree-Fock theory 229 helical domains 94 heroin 81... 

---