Hartree-Fock orbital energies table

Pseudopotentials (PP) were originally proposed to reduce the computational cost for the heavy atoms with the replacement of the core orbitals by an effective potential. Modern pseudopotentials implicitly include relativistic effects by means of adjustment to quasi-relativistic Har-tree-Fock or Dirac-Hartree-Fock orbital energies and densities [35]. In the present research, we adopted Peterson s correlation-consistent cc-pVnZ-PP (n — D, T, Q, 5) basis sets [23] with the corresponding relativistic pseudopotential for the Br atom. The corresponding cc-pVnZ (n = D, T, Q, 5) basis sets were used for the O and H atoms. The optimized geometries and relative energies for the stationary points are reported in Table 1 and Fig. 3, and the harmonic vibrational frequencies and zero-point vibrational energies are reported in Table 4. 

TABLE 4.1 Hartree-Fock orbital energies. The energy in , is given for each electron, as well as the total computed and experimental energies, in selected ground state atoms. 

In Table 4.1, we see that there are three different orbital energy values given for the Li atom, whereas only two distinct energies are listed for the orbitals of Be. How many distinct Hartree-Fock orbital energies will there be for the electrons of atomic calcium in its lowest excited electronic state ... 

Hartree-Fock orbitals are used. The contributions from these clusters are exactly equal to zero when Brueckner orbitals are usedso It is now also understandable that all products containing such as t t, t t k etc. will be small. Generally, the effect of linked tri-excited clusters as well as that of linked tetra-excited clusters is small. (The calculations demonstrating these effects will be discussed in Section VI.G.) It is possible to state that from three-electron clusters upwards the contribution to the correlation energy coming from linked clusters decreases rapidly. This is also understandable due to the fact that these contributions first appear in terms of higher orders in the perturbation expansion, which is demonstrated in Table 1. From the above discussion it is possible to conclude that the most important clusters are... 

Table 12 Structure of the Hamiltonian matrix when the single determinantal reference function is constructedfrom Hartree-Fock orbitals. The order of perturbation theory in which each block contributes to the correlation energy is indicated...

Let us first consider the calculations on the H2 system. In Table 12.2, the MP2 natural orbitals are used in the first iteration in Table 12.3, we use the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals. Because of the different choices of orbitals, the optimizations proceed rather differently. For the optimization based on the MP2 natural orbitals, the optimization begins in the local region each step corresporxls to a Newton step with no step-length restrictions. Quadratic convergence is therefore observed in all outer iterations - see the reduction in the gradient and step norms in Table 12.2. The ratio parameter r (12.3.21), which probes the quadratic dominance of the energy function, is close to 1 in all iterations. 

In Table 14.8, we have listed the CASPT and MPPT energies calculated up to order 10 for the water molecule at the geometries / ref and 2/ ref- The CASPT results have been calculated using the uncontracted, determinantal scheme. In the CASPT calculations, a (3.0.1.2) valence CAS reference state is employed, with the inactive ai CAS orbital frozen in the MPPT calculations, the canonical lot Hartree-Fock orbital has been kept frozen. 

TABLE 2 Hartree-Fock (HF) energy, correlation energy (CE) and total energy (TE) for non-confined FI, Fie and LF atoms estimated by the modified Slater type orbitals (MSTO) andw the correlated consistent basis set fimctions aug-cc-pVTZ and aug-cc-pVQZ. All energies are reported in Hartrees. 

A great failing of the Hiickel models is their treatment of electron repulsion. Electron repulsion is not treated explicitly it is somehow averaged within the spirit of Hartree-Fock theory. 1 gave you a Hiickel jr-electron treatment of pyridine in Chapter 7. Orbital energies are shown in Table 8.1. 

Experimentally determined maximum absolute ionization cross sections for the inert gases and a range of small molecules are compared with the predictions of DM, BEB, and EM calculations in Table 1. Atomic orbital coefficients for the DM calculations were determined at the Hartree-Fock level and the EM cross sections are volume averaged for calculations carried out at the HF/6-31G level. Hie same data are plotted in Figure 5 with the calculated values on the ordinate and the experimental result on the abscissa. The heavy line represents a direct correspondence between experiment and theory. Although the ab initio EM method performs well for the calculation of qm and Em,T,17 the DM and BEB methods allow for the calculation of the cross section as a function of the electron energy, i.e. the ionization... 

We have applied the above procedure to a selected number of free atoms with Z< 36 not reported in Ref. [52]. Table 1 displays the optimized orbital parameters and total ground state energies as compared to corresponding Hartree-Fock estimates [61]. Note that for most of the systems, the TFD(1/8)W energies are systematically below the HF values by about 0.1% difference indicating a possible best value for the 2 parameter close to 2 = 1/8. 

---