Hartree-Fock method energy calculations

Experimental data vs. calculated solubilities for hydrolysis reactions. 325-30 Experimental data vs. Hartree-Fock methods, energy level... 

Table 6 Matrix Dirac-Hartree-Fock (Edhf) and Hartree-Fock (Ehf) energies calculated using BERTHA. The Gaussian exponential parameters are those of the non-relativistic sets derived by van Duijenveldt and tabulated in Poirier et al [36]. Thejirst-order molecular Breit energy, Eb, v as calculated using methods described in [12] relativistic corrections to Ehf collected in the column labelled E energies are in atomic units.

Not all iterative semi-empirical or ab initio calculations converge for all cases. For SCF calculations of electronic structure, systems with a small energy gap between the highest occupied orbital and the lowest unoccupied orbital may not converge or may converge slowly. (They are generally poorly described by the Hartree-Fock method.)... 

For the UHF calculations the undectet implies = 5 (septet implies 3z = 3) and the electrons are assigned as suggested by the ROHF calculation. For the 5 = 0 case the electrons are assigned to be AF coupled. The Projected Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (PUHF) energies correspond to the fully projected UHF values with 3 = 5. A brief overview of the PUHF method is given below, a more detailed description can be found in Reference 4. 

It is important to realize that each of the electronic-structure methods discussed above displays certain shortcomings in reproducing the correct band structure of the host crystal and consequently the positions of defect levels. Hartree-Fock methods severely overestimate the semiconductor band gap, sometimes by several electron volts (Estreicher, 1988). In semi-empirical methods, the situation is usually even worse, and the band structure may not be reliably represented (Deak and Snyder, 1987 Besson et al., 1988). Density-functional theory, on the other hand, provides a quite accurate description of the band structure, except for an underestimation of the band gap (by up to 50%). Indeed, density-functional theory predicts conduction bands and hence conduction-band-derived energy levels to be too low. This problem has been studied in great detail, and its origins are well understood (see, e.g., Hybertsen and Louie, 1986). To solve it, however, requires techniques of many-body theory and carrying out a quasi-particle calculation. Such calculational schemes are presently prohibitively complex and too computationally demanding to apply to defect calculations. 

In most atomic programs (5) is actually solved self-consistently either in a local potential or by the relativistic Hartree-Fock method. There is, however, an important time-saving device that is often used in energy band calculations for actinides where the same radial Eq. (5) must be solved If (5.a) is substituted into (5.b) a single second order differential equation for the major component is obtained... 

---