Hartree-Fock function ground state

Consider the Hartree-Fock (HF) ground state of the N-electron neutral cluster, One can form a complete orthonormal set of the (N — l)-electron basis functions, fI/v 11, applying the so-called physical excitation operators,... 

Multiconhgurational methods have been particularly successful in studies of transition metal complexes, both for ground state and excited states. This is an area where the alternative methods are few. Many open shells with varying values of the spin together with many close lying electronic states (not only singly excited) makes it difficult to use simple methods like Density Functional Theory, or other methods which assume a Hartree-Fock like ground states. 

We now consider the theoretical calculation of excited-state wave functions. This is more difficult than ground-state calculations because we are dealing with open-shell configurations. The Hartree-Fock equations for a state of an open-shell configuration have a more complicated form than for closed shells, and there exist close to a dozen different approaches to excited-state Hartree-Fock calculations. As noted earlier, the Hartree-Fock wave function for a closed-shell state is a single determinant, but for open-shell states, we may have to take a linear combination of a few Slater determinants to get a Hartree-Fock function that is an eigenfunction of S and Sz and has the correct spatial symmetry. 

I>aOb, but the number of configurations rapidly becomes very large. Thus if <1>A and Hartree-Fock function plus double excitations, then d>A J B includes double and quadruple excitations relative to the ground-state AB. In order to maintain a consistent description, the pseudostates, Oa for example, must consist of a set of singly excited functions plus further double replacements, i.e. one- and three-fold excitations relative to the Hartree-Fock ground state of A. Structures a b for the dimer consequently include two-, four- and six-fold excitations. In essence, one requires that the AB wavefunctions fulfil the condition of size consistency. 

This leads lu a very bad description of the H2 molecule at long iiiicinuclcai disianecs with the Haitree-Fock method. Indeed, for long internuclear distances, the Heitler-London function should dominate, because it corresponds to the (correct) dissociation limit (two ground-state hydrogen atoms). The trouble is that with fixed coefficients, the Hartree-Fock function overestimates the role of the ionic structure for long interatomic distances. Fig. 10.5 shows that the Heitler-London function describes the electron correlation (Coulomb hole), whereas the Haitree-Fock function does not. 

In the perturbational approach (cf. 232) to the electron correlation, the Hartree-Fock function, >0, is treated as the zero-order approximation to the true ground-state wave function i.e., I>o = Thus, the Hartree-Fock wave function stands at the starting point, while the goal is the exact ground-state electronic wave function. 

The coupled-cluster (CC) method is an attempt to find such an expansion of the wave function in terms of the Slater determinants, which would preserve size consistency. In this method, the wave function for the electronic ground state is obtained as a result of the operation of the wave operator exp (T) on the Hartree-Fock function (this ensures size consistency). The wave operator exp (T) contains the cluster operator T, which is defined as the sum of the operators for the Z-tuple excitations, Ti up to a certain maximum I = Zmax. Each 2) operator is the sum of the operators each responsible for a particular l-Uiple excitation multiplied by its amplitude t. The aim of the CC method is to find the t values since they determine the wave function and energy. The method... 

We saw above that the unperturbed functions iAf are all possible Slater determinants formed from n different spin-orbitals. Let i, j, k, I,. .. denote the occupied spin-orbitals in the ground-state Hartree-Fock function o, and let a, b,c,d,.. . denote the unoccupied (virtual) spin-orbitals. Each unperturbed wave function can be classified by the number of virtual spin-orbitals it contains this number is called the excitation level. Let denote the singly excited determinant that differs from d>o solely by replacement of the occupied spin-orbital m, by the virtual spin-orbital Let denote the doubly excited determinant formed from [Pg.541]

Fromhere forward, we will treat the Hartree-Fock function as the basis for the further investigations and denote it as Yq, where the subscript 0 indicates the ground state and the superscript (0) is the reference function. We will also omit the explicit writing of the dependence of the Hamiltonian and the wave function on the coordinates of N electrons. As a consequence. 

To use direct dynamics for the study of non-adiabatic systems it is necessary to be able to efficiently and accurately calculate electronic wave functions for excited states. In recent years, density functional theory (DFT) has been gaining ground over traditional Hartree-Fock based SCF calculations for the treatment of the ground state of large molecules. Recent advances mean that so-called time-dependent DFT methods are now also being applied to excited states. Even so, at present, the best general methods for the treatment of the photochemistry of polyatomic organic molecules are MCSCF methods, of which the CASSCF method is particularly powerful. 

The premise behind DFT is that the energy of a molecule can be determined from the electron density instead of a wave function. This theory originated with a theorem by Hoenburg and Kohn that stated this was possible. The original theorem applied only to finding the ground-state electronic energy of a molecule. A practical application of this theory was developed by Kohn and Sham who formulated a method similar in structure to the Hartree-Fock method. 

Quantum mechanics calculations use either of two forms of the wave function Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) or Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF). Use the RHF wave function for singlet electronic states, such as the ground states of stable organic molecules. 

Configuration Interaction (or electron correlation) adds to the single determinant of the Hartree-Fock wave function a linear combination of determinants that play the role of atomic orbitals. This is similar to constructing a molecular orbital as a linear combination of atomic orbitals. Like the LCAO approximation. Cl calculations determine the weighting of each determinant to produce the lowest energy ground state (see SCFTechnique on page 43). 

The problem has now become how to solve for the set of molecular orbital expansion coefficients, c. . Hartree-Fock theory takes advantage of the variational principle, which says that for the ground state of any antisymmetric normalized function of the electronic coordinates, which we will denote H, then the expectation value for the energy corresponding to E will always be greater than the energy for the exact wave function ... 

The ab initio methods used by most investigators include Hartree-Fock (FFF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) [6, 7]. An ab initio method typically uses one of many basis sets for the solution of a particular problem. These basis sets are discussed in considerable detail in references [1] and [8]. DFT is based on the proof that the ground state electronic energy is determined completely by the electron density [9]. Thus, there is a direct relationship between electron density and the energy of a system. DFT calculations are extremely popular, as they provide reliable molecular structures and are considerably faster than FFF methods where correlation corrections (MP2) are included. Although intermolecular interactions in ion-pairs are dominated by dispersion interactions, DFT (B3LYP) theory lacks this term [10-14]. FFowever, DFT theory is quite successful in representing molecular structure, which is usually a primary concern. 

Here, /j and rj are the l" left- and the J right-hand eigenvectors of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H. The operator is represented on the space spanned by the manifold created by the excitations out of a Hartree-Fock reference determinant, including the null excitation (the reference function). When we calculate the transition probability between a ground state g) and an excited state ]e), we need to evaluate and The reference function is a right-... 

---