Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hardness data comparison

From the NMR-data for dl 33 and meso 33 it can be concluded that in the racemic form both hexahelicenyl moieties are almost perpendicular, whereas in the mesoform the central biphenyl moiety is planar 25). The three double helicenes 54, 55 and 56 could only be isolated in one form. For 55 this was the racemic form having the terminal rings at opposite sides of the central part, as could be deduced from the isolation of optically active samples. From racemization experiments (vide infra) it could be deduced that the mesoform can hardly exist. Comparison of the NMR spectra of 54 and 56 with that of 55 suggests that 54 and 56 are also racemic forms. The chemical shift of H(16) and H(17) in 56 has the lowest value found for protons in carbohelicenes. [Pg.102]

Additionally, a scale that allows for comparisons exceeding one order of magnitude and functionality to include hard data are included in the Expert Choice software (cf. Forman and Selly 2002, p. 67 and pp. 140-144). Haines (1998) proposes approaches to accommodate cases where the decision maker is uncertain about his preferences and prefers to assign intervals of preference instead of single points. [Pg.140]

Only soft polyurethanes were obtained with low polyol/NCO block ratios, irrespective of the chain-extender system used. However, using mixed linear chain extenders generally resulted in softer elastomers than their single-diol analogues. For example, a comparison of the hardness data in Figs 12.3 and 12.5 show that in the 1 4 3 block ratio the single-diol PU has a hardness of 90, whereas the mixed diol system gives a urethane of only 75 IRHD hardness. [Pg.348]

The output of the wetting balance provides hard data which then gives the engineer the abUity to perform a statistical comparison of both the population being tested and the other production batches from the same supplier or off the same plating hue. [Pg.1001]

Methods and previous articles 16, 25, 27). A Perkin Elmer AAnalyst 400 FAAS with auto-sampler was used. The auto-sampler expedited the measurement of the standard solutions and samples that were used by about 30 students in each of the three class periods. Each pair of students calculated their own average water hardness from both the titration and FAAS data and then compared the two methods to each other and then to the accepted value for water hardness. Statistical comparison using student s t-tests could have been done, but was not in this case. Table 4 shows proposed student outcomes from the research project and two experiments. [Pg.63]

For thermoplastic materials, hardness is often described using the term durometer. A common test is the Shore durometer test, with some of the common test protocols being A, B, C, and D. A comparison of hardness data for some common materials are given in the graph below (Figure 7.22). [Pg.290]

However, before proceeding with the description of simulation data, we would like to comment the theoretical background. Similarly to the previous example, in order to obtain the pair correlation function of matrix spheres we solve the common Ornstein-Zernike equation complemented by the PY closure. Next, we would like to consider the adsorption of a hard sphere fluid in a microporous environment provided by a disordered matrix of permeable species. The fluid to be adsorbed is considered at density pj = pj-Of. The equilibrium between an adsorbed fluid and its bulk counterpart (i.e., in the absence of the matrix) occurs at constant chemical potential. However, in the theoretical procedure we need to choose the value for the fluid density first, and calculate the chemical potential afterwards. The ROZ equations, (22) and (23), are applied to decribe the fluid-matrix and fluid-fluid correlations. These correlations are considered by using the PY closure, such that the ROZ equations take the Madden-Glandt form as in the previous example. The structural properties in terms of the pair correlation functions (the fluid-matrix function is of special interest for models with permeabihty) cannot represent the only issue to investigate. Moreover, to perform comparisons of the structure under different conditions we need to calculate the adsorption isotherms pf jSpf). The chemical potential of a... [Pg.313]

According to Vitanov et a/.,61,151 C,- varies in the order Ag(100) < Ag(lll), i.e., in the reverse order with respect to that of Valette and Hamelin.24 63 67 150 383-390 The order of electrolytically grown planes clashes with the results of quantum-chemical calculations,436 439 as well as with the results of the jellium/hard sphere model for the metal/electro-lyte interface.428 429 435 A comparison of C, values for quasi-perfect Ag planes with the data of real Ag planes shows that for quasi-perfect Ag planes, the values of Cf 0 are remarkably higher than those for real Ag planes. A definite difference between real and quasi-perfect Ag electrodes may be the higher number of defects expected for a real Ag crystal. 15 32 i25 401407 10-416-422 since the defects seem to be the sites of stronger adsorption, one would expect that quasi-perfect surfaces would have a smaller surface activity toward H20 molecules and so lower Cf"0 values. The influence of the surface defects on H20 adsorption at Ag from a gas phase has been demonstrated by Klaua and Madey.445... [Pg.76]

Figure 6.3 Ag-Au solid solution. Comparison of measured hardnesses and values calculated from heats of mixing. Data from Sachs and Weerts (1930). Figure 6.3 Ag-Au solid solution. Comparison of measured hardnesses and values calculated from heats of mixing. Data from Sachs and Weerts (1930).
Chin, et al. (1972) measured the hardnesses of Na and K halides (Cl, Br, and I) containing various additions of Ca++, Sr++, or Ba++. Then they extrapolated the measurements back to zero additions to get values for the pure crystals. They found that the latter depended linearly on the Young s moduli of their crystals. Gilman (1973) found an equally good correlation with the shear stiffnesses, where FI = 1.37 x 10 2 C44 (d/cm2) in excellent agreement with Equation 9.1. A comparison of the data and the theory is given in Figure 9.5. [Pg.122]

For the first time, the primary nitrone (formaldonitrone) generation and the comparative quantum chemical analysis of its relative stability by comparison with isomers (formaldoxime, nitrosomethane and oxaziridine) has been described (357). Both, experimental and theoretical data clearly show that the formal-donitrones, formed in the course of collision by electronic transfer, can hardly be molecularly isomerized into other [C,H3,N,0] molecules. Methods of quantum chemistry and molecular dynamics have made it possible to study the reactions of nitrone rearrangement into amides through the formation of oxaziridines (358). [Pg.184]


See other pages where Hardness data comparison is mentioned: [Pg.63]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.1025]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.2360]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.732]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.1423]    [Pg.81]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.290 , Pg.290 ]




SEARCH



Data comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info