Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hamiltonian transition probabilities

The ordinary BO approximate equations failed to predict the proper symmetry allowed transitions in the quasi-JT model whereas the extended BO equation either by including a vector potential in the system Hamiltonian or by multiplying a phase factor onto the basis set can reproduce the so-called exact results obtained by the two-surface diabatic calculation. Thus, the calculated hansition probabilities in the quasi-JT model using the extended BO equations clearly demonshate the GP effect. The multiplication of a phase factor with the adiabatic nuclear wave function is an approximate treatment when the position of the conical intersection does not coincide with the origin of the coordinate axis, as shown by the results of [60]. Moreover, even if the total energy of the system is far below the conical intersection point, transition probabilities in the JT model clearly indicate the importance of the extended BO equation and its necessity. [Pg.80]

The fact that detailed balance provides only half the number of constraints to fix the unknown coefficients in the transition probabilities is not really surprising considering that, if it would fix them all, then the static (lattice gas) Hamiltonian would dictate the kind of kinetics possible in the system. Again, this cannot be so because this Hamiltonian does not include the energy exchange dynamics between adsorbate and substrate. As a result, any functional relation between the A and D coefficients in (44) must be postulated ad hoc (or calculated from a microscopic Hamiltonian that accounts for couphng of the adsorbate to the lattice or electronic degrees of freedom of the substrate). Several scenarios have been discussed in the literature [57]. [Pg.465]

As long as the condition (13) is satisfied, any choice of the transition probability is possible. For the lattice-gas model with the Hamiltonian (2), a simple choice is the following ... [Pg.864]

Here, /j and rj are the l" left- and the J right-hand eigenvectors of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H. The operator is represented on the space spanned by the manifold created by the excitations out of a Hartree-Fock reference determinant, including the null excitation (the reference function). When we calculate the transition probability between a ground state g) and an excited state ]e), we need to evaluate and The reference function is a right-... [Pg.159]

In this chapter we continue our journey into the quantum mechanics of paramagnetic molecules, while increasing our focus on aspects of relevance to biological systems. For each and every system of whatever complexity and symmetry (or the lack of it) we can, in principle, write out the appropriate spin Hamiltonian and the associated (simple or compounded) spin wavefunctions. Subsequently, we can always deduce the full energy matrix, and we can numerically diagonalize this matrix to obtain the stable energy levels of the system (and therefore all the resonance conditions), and also the coefficients of the new basis set (linear combinations of the original spin wavefunctions), which in turn can be used to calculate the transition probability, and thus the EPR amplitude of all transitions. [Pg.135]

We have seen that a spin Hamiltonian in combination with its associated spin wavefunctions defines an energy matrix, which can always be diagonalized to obtain all the real energy sublevels of the spin manifold. Furthermore, the diagonaliza-tion also affords a new set of spin wavefunctions that are a basis for the diagonal matrix, and which are linear combinations of the initial set of spin functions. The coefficients in these linear combinations can be used to calculate the transition probabilities of all transitions within the spin manifold. [Pg.141]

The theoretical studies usually obtained the infrared transition probabilities from the diagonalization of a total Hamiltonian which did not account for relaxational mechanisms. The theoretical spectra are then composed of Dirac delta peaks that are not fully suitable for comparison with experimental spectra. [Pg.247]

Approximation methods that lead to an estimate of transition probabilities are of more importance in chemical problems and involve time-dependent perturbations. The total Hamiltonian is split as... [Pg.339]

Both the initial- and the final-state wavefunctions are stationary solutions of their respective Hamiltonians. A transition between these states must be effected by a perturbation, an interaction that is not accounted for in these Hamiltonians. In our case this is the electronic interaction between the reactant and the electrode. We assume that this interaction is so small that the transition probability can be calculated from first-order perturbation theory. This limits our treatment to nonadiabatic reactions, which is a severe restriction. At present there is no satisfactory, fully quantum-mechanical theory for adiabatic electrochemical electron-transfer reactions. [Pg.264]

For the evaluation of energy levels, ENDOR frequencies and nuclear transition probabilities from the spin Hamiltonian (3.1), we apply the generalized operator transform method, published by Schweiger et al.55, which is only based on the assumptions 3fEZ > and 2fhfs s> 3 Q. No restrictions are made on the relative magnitudes of 3 hfs and... [Pg.14]

The crystal field model may also provide a calciflation scheme for the transition probabilities between levels perturbed by the crystal field. It is so called weak crystal field approximation. In this case the crystal field has little effect on the total Hamiltonian and it is regarded as a perturbation of the energy levels of the free ion. Judd and Ofelt, who showed that the odd terms in the crystal field expansion might connect the 4/ configuration with the 5d and 5g configurations, made such calculations. The result of the calculation for the oscillator strength, due to a forced electric dipole transition between the two states makes it possible to calculate the intensities of the lines due to forced electric dipole transitions. [Pg.120]

Transition probabilities. The interaction of quantum systems with light may be studied with the help of Schrodinger s time-dependent perturbation theory. A molecular complex may be in an initial state i), an eigenstate of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, Jfo I ) = E 10- If the system is irradiated by electromagnetic radiation of frequency v = co/2nc, transitions to other quantum states /) of the complex occur if the frequency is sufficiently close to Bohr s frequency condition,... [Pg.49]

Point-group symmetry exists only within a particular Born-Oppen-heimer approximation. Though point-group symmetry often has little to do with spin conservation, it will be found in Section VIII that spin concepts and point-group symmetry are intermingled when a Hamiltonian involving spin interactions is considered. Also, we will find that Born-Oppenheimer approximations are important in Franck-Condon factors Franck-Condon factors are, in turn, critical in determining transition probabilities for a number of spin-forbidden processes. [Pg.8]

We assume again that the atoms follow straight line trajectories, and we calculate the transition probability, P(b), from the initial to the final state in a collision with a given impact parameter, b. We then compute the cross section by integrating over impact parameter, and, if necessary, angle of v relative to E to obtain the cross section. The central problem is the calculation of the transition probability P(b). The Schroedinger equation for this problem has the Hamiltonian... [Pg.294]

To describe the shifts and intensities of the m-photon assisted collisional resonances with the microwave field Pillet et al. developed a picture based on dressed molecular states,3 and we follow that development here. As in the previous chapter, we break the Hamiltonian into an unperturbed Hamiltonian H(h and a perturbation V. The difference from our previous treatment of resonant collisions is that now H0 describes the isolated, noninteracting, atoms in both static and microwave fields. Each of the two atoms is described by a dressed atomic state, and we construct the dressed molecular state as a direct product of the two atomic states. The dipole-dipole interaction Vis still given by Eq. (14.12), and using it we can calculate the transition probabilities and cross sections for the radiatively assisted collisions. [Pg.321]

Contact interactions also give rise to relaxation. The perturbing Hamiltonian for contact interaction, H (last term in Eq. (III.l)), is analogous to the first term of the perturbing Hamiltonian of the dipolar interaction (see Appendix V, Eq. (V.10)) except that the part containing the ladder operators is multiplied by 1 /2 instead of — 1/4. The transition probability wq (see Fig. 3.8) is provided by (see Appendix V)... [Pg.340]


See other pages where Hamiltonian transition probabilities is mentioned: [Pg.1553]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.140]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 , Pg.270 , Pg.271 , Pg.285 ]




SEARCH



Transition probability

Transition probability transitions

© 2024 chempedia.info