Ground state perturbation

Now we come, in our design of phosphors, to the choice of suitable activators. Because of the limitations imposed by the ground state perturbation factor, we are limited to certain cations in specific valence states. As we have stated before, this limits us to the electron configuration d O (i So). The following diagram shows these choices ... 

However, in our scheme of activator ground states, this electron configuration would be subject to substantial ground state perturbation, particularly when used in dielectric host crystals. Indeed, they do not function very well as activators when incorporated into such hosts. However, they do function well in the semi-conducting hosts, ZnS (CdS) and ZnSe. The lowest energy excited state for this electron configuration is Di/2 but the transition is not dipole allowed. 

After considerable work, it was determined that the hosts which work best in this application are those in which vlbronic coupling is minimized. This was established by determining and comparing the phonon dispersion branches of the various compounds. It was found that those hosts which have low energy optical branches in the phonon spectrum function best for up-conversion phosphor applications. Note that this is akin to minimizing ground state perturbation at the activator site proper choice of host. The best hosts were found to be ... 

The ground state perturbing triplet mechanism (second term of Eq. 9.76) can occur if... 

Hamiltonian (9.4), is (n + )hv [Eq. (4.45)], where n is a nonnegative integer, (n is used instead of v for consistency with the perturbation-theory notation.) Note that the superscript does not mean the ground state. Perturbation theory can be applied to any state. The subscript n labels the state we are dealing with. The superscript denotes the unperturbed system. 

Figure 4-2. The ground-state perturbed wavefiinction up to a first-order correction for a particle in a 1 -dimensional box with a positive potential blip in the center 10% of the box as described in Examples 4-3 and 4-4, The potential e is equal to four times the unpertubed ground-state energy.

Initially set this ratio to 4. In the third column of the spreadsheet, compute the value of the ground-state perturbed wavefunction as given in Example 4-4 for each of the x/L values in the first column using the defined cell. Make a plot that contains both the perturbed and unperturbed wavefunction as a function of x/L. Change the value of the defined cell... 

In the case of Ru(2,2 -bipyridine)3 adsorbed on porous Vycor glass, it was inferred that structural perturbation occurs in the excited state, R, but not in the ground state [209]. 

Nevertheless, equation (A 1.1.145) fonns the basis for the approximate diagonalization procedure provided by perturbation theory. To proceed, the exact ground-state eigenvalue and correspondmg eigenvector are written as the sums... 

For two Bom-Oppenlieimer surfaces (the ground state and a single electronic excited state), the total photodissociation cross section for the system to absorb a photon of energy ai, given that it is initially at a state x) with energy can be shown, by simple application of second-order perturbation theory, to be [89]... 

Ah initio methods are applicable to the widest variety of property calculations. Many typical organic molecules can now be modeled with ah initio methods, such as Flartree-Fock, density functional theory, and Moller Plesset perturbation theory. Organic molecule calculations are made easier by the fact that most organic molecules have singlet spin ground states. Organics are the systems for which sophisticated properties, such as NMR chemical shifts and nonlinear optical properties, can be calculated most accurately. 

Because aH bonds within the polymethine chain of symmetrical PMDs are significantly equalized and change slightly on excitation, relatively smaH Stokes shifts (500 600 cm ) are observed in their spectra. In unsymmetrical PMDs, the essential bond alternation exists in the ground state. However, bond orders in the excited state are found to be insensitive to the symmetry perturbation. As a result, the deviations of fluorescence maxima, are much lower than those of absorption maxima, (3,10,56—58). The vinylene shifts of fluorescence maxima of unsymmetrical PMDs are practicaHy constant and equal to 100 nm (57). 

The result in Equation 51 indicates that substitutions close in energy to the ground state make larger contributions to the perturbation. Similarly, the mote strongly... 

MNDOC has the same functional form as MNDO, however, electron correlation is explicitly calculated by second-order perturbation theory. The derivation of the MNDOC parameters is done by fitting the correlated MNDOC results to experimental data. Electron correlation in MNDO is only included implicitly via the parameters, from fitting to experimental results. Since the training set only includes ground-state stable molecules, MNDO has problems treating systems where the importance of electron comelation is substantially different from normal molecules. MNDOC consequently performs significantly better for systems where this is not the case, such as transition structures and excited states. 

Lowdin, P-O., Studies in Perturbation Theory. X. Bounds to Energy Eigenvalues in Perturbation Theory Ground State, Physical Review, 1965 139A 357-364. 

What is of primary importance chemically is not the ground state, nor the ground configuration, which is some average of valence states, of the free atom but it is the atomic response properties to perturbations by other atoms. That is governed by the energies and spatial extensions and polarizabilities of the upper core and of the compact valence orbitals ([34], p 653). 

---