Greens Function Quantum Monte Carlo

The time-independent Schrodinger equation, Eq. [8], may be written in the form 

To keep positive, the energy must be made negative. This can be done by adjusting the reference or zero of the potential energy by an appropriate offset of energy. 

---

Buendia et al. calculated many states of the iron atom with VMC using orbitals obtained from the parametrized optimal effective potential method with all electrons included. Iron is a particularly difficult system, and the VMC results are only moderately accurate. The same authors also pubhshed VMC and Green s functions quantum Monte Carlo (GFMQ calculations on the first transition-row atoms with all electrons. GFMC is a variant of DMC where intermediate steps are used to remove the time step error. Cafiarel et al. presented a very careful study on the role of electron correlation and relativistic effects in the copper atom using all-electron DMC. Relativistic effects were calculated with the Dirac-Fock model. Several states of the atom were evaluated and an accuracy of about 0.15 eV was achieved with a single determinant. ... 

Carlo method (VQMC), the diffusion quantum Monte Carlo method (DQMC), the Green s function quantum Monte Carlo method (GFQMC), and the path integral quantum Monte Carlo method (PIQMC). These methods are by their nature strongly related and each has its own peculiar advantages and disadvantages relative to the others. 

A method that avoids making the HF mistakes in the first place is called quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). There are several types of QMC variational, dilfusion, and Greens function Monte Carlo calculations. These methods work with an explicitly correlated wave function. This is a wave function that has a function of the electron-electron distance (a generalization of the original work by Hylleraas). 

The fourth method used for quantum chemical calculations is the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) method, in which the Schrodinger equation is solved numerically. There are three general variants of QMC variational MC (VMC), diffusion QMC (DQMC), and Green s function QMC (GFQMC), all of which... 

D. Ceperley (1986) The Statistical Error of Green s Function Monte Carlo, in Proceedings of the Metropolis Symposium on. The Frontiers of Quantum Monte Carlo. J. Stat. Phys. 43, p. 815... 

D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder (1984) Quantum Monte Carlo for molecules Green s function and nodal release. J. Chem. Phys. 81, p. 5833... 

This review is a brief update of the recent progress in the attempt to calculate properties of atoms and molecules by stochastic methods which go under the general name of quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). Below we distinguish between basic variants of QMC variational Monte Carlo (VMC), diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC), Green s function Monte Carlo (GFMC), and path-integral Monte Carlo (PIMC). 

Another branch of computational quantum mechanics, quantum Monte Carlo, is described in Chapter 3 by Professor James B. Anderson. Quantum Monte Carlo techniques, such as variational, diffusion, and Green s function, are explained, along with applications to atoms, molecules, clusters, liquids, and solids. Quantum Monte Carlo is not as widely used as other approaches to solving the Schrodinger equation for the electronic structure of a system, and the programs for running these calculations are not as user friendly as those based on the Hartree-Fock approach. This chapter sheds much needed light on the topic. 

DMC = diffusion Monte Carlo GFMC = Green s function Monte Carlo QMC = quantum Monte Carlo VMC = variational Monte Carlo. 

Other quantum simulations involve simulations with effective Hamiltonians [261-263] or the simulation of ground state wave properties by Green s function Monte Carlo or diffusion Monte Carlo for reviews and further references on these methods see Refs. 162, 264-268. 

The fits of Janev et al. [12] stem from a compilation of the results obtained with different theoretical approaches (i) semi-classical close-coupling methods with a development of the wave function on atomic orbitals (Fritsch and Lin [16]), molecular orbitals (Green et al [17]), or both (Kimura and Lin [18], (ii) pure classical model - i.e. the Classical Trajectory Monte Carlo method (Olson and Schultz [19]) - and (iii) perturbative quantum approach (Belkic et al. [20]). In order to get precise fits, theoretical results accuracy was estimated according to many criteria, most important being the domain of validity of each technique. 

For both bosonic systems and fermionic systems in the fixed-node approximation, G has only nonnegative elements. This is essential for the Monte Carlo methods discussed here. A problem specific to quantum mechanical systems is that G is known only asymptotically for short times, so that the finite-time Green function has to be constructed by the application of the generalized Trotter formula [6,7], G(r) = limm 00 G(z/m)m, where the position variables of G have been suppressed. 

The material presented above was selected to describe from a unified point of view Monte Carlo algorithms as employed in seemingly unrelated areas in quantum and statistical mechanics. Details of applications were given only to explain general ideas or important technical problems, such as encountered in diffusion Monte Carlo. We ignored a whole body of literature, but we wish to just mention a few topics. Domain Green function Monte Carlo [25-28] is one that comes very close to topics that were... 

The fermion and Green s Function Monte Carlo are important in themselves and interesting as hints to the richness of methodology that can be brought to bear on the computation of quantum systems. In the short term we expect to broaden the specific trial functions used in fermion Monte Carlo to permit the more accurate study of He-3 and the treatment of more realistic models of nuclear and neutron matter. We expect also to try a variant in Quantum Chemistry problems. 

---