Graphene sheets layered

Powder X-ray diffraction and SAXS were employed here to explore the microstructure of hard carbon samples with high capacities. Powder X-ray diffraction measurements were made on all the samples listed in Table 4. We concentrate here on sample BrlOOO, shown in Fig. 27. A weak and broad (002) Bragg peak (near 22°) is observed. Well formed (100) (at about 43.3°) and (110) (near 80°) peaks are also seen. The sample is predominantly made up of graphene sheets with a lateral extension of about 20-30A (referring to Table 2, applying the Scherrer equation to the (100) peaks). These layers are not stacked in a parallel fashion, and therefore, there must be small pores or voids between them. We used SAXS to probe these pores. 

Fig. 32. Reversible capacity of microporous carbon prepared from phenolic resins heated between 940 to 1 I00°C plotted as a function of the X-ray ratio R. R is a parameter which is empirically correlated to the fraction of single-layer graphene sheets in the samples.

Fig. 2. By rolling up a graphene sheet (a single layer of ear-bon atoms from a 3D graphite erystal) as a cylinder and capping each end of the eyiinder with half of a fullerene molecule, a fullerene-derived tubule, one layer in thickness, is formed. Shown here is a schematic theoretical model for a single-wall carbon tubule with the tubule axis OB (see Fig. 1) normal to (a) the 6 = 30° direction (an armchair tubule), (b) the 6 = 0° direction (a zigzag tubule), and (c) a general direction B with 0 < 6 < 30° (a chiral tubule). The actual tubules shown in the figure correspond to (n,m) values of (a) (5,5), (b) (9,0), and (c) (10,5).

The optimised interlayer distance of a concentric bilayered CNT by density-functional theory treatment was calculated to be 3.39 A [23] compared with the experimental value of 3.4 A [24]. Modification of the electronic structure (especially metallic state) due to the inner tube has been examined for two kinds of models of concentric bilayered CNT, (5, 5)-(10, 10) and (9, 0)-(18, 0), in the framework of the Huckel-type treatment [25]. The stacked layer patterns considered are illustrated in Fig. 8. It has been predicted that metallic property would not change within this stacking mode due to symmetry reason, which is almost similar to the case in the interlayer interaction of two graphene sheets [26]. Moreover, in the three-dimensional graphite, the interlayer distance of which is 3.35 A [27], there is only a slight overlapping (0.03-0.04 eV) of the HO and the LU bands at the Fermi level of a sheet of graphite plane [28,29],... 

Flat single-layer graphene is a zero band-gap semiconductor [50], in which every direction for electron transport is possible. However, when the graphene sheet is rolled up to form a SWCNT, the number of allowed states is limited by quantum confinement in the radial direction [17], i.e. the movement of electrons is confined by the periodic boundary condition [51] ... 

It often becomes necessary to prepare dispersions of graphene in organic or aqueous media [73-74]. For this purpose, different approaches have been successfully employed for few-layer graphene. The two main approaches for obtaining this type of graphene are covalent functionalization or by means of noncovalent interactions. There has been some recent effort to carry out covalent and noncovalent functionalization of graphene with aromatic molecules, which help to exfoliate and stabilize the individual graphene sheets and to modify their electronic properties [75 84]. 

---