Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Glassy polymers, examples

There is much evidence that the intrinsic crazing of PC is related to the existence of a general mode of cavitational plasticity in glassy polymers. Examples have been given for polymers which behave very similar to PC. In particular PMMA and pre-oriented PS exhibit an almost identical behavior when stretched at high stresses and strains in a temperature region close to Tg. [Pg.100]

Its validity at normal temperatures was shown for more than 60 materials, ranging from pure metals to glassy polymers. Obviously, the polymers of the present study are good examples for Barker s rule. The product ot2E is linked to the difference of the two heat capacities c0 and cE, measured under constant stress and under constant strain, respectively [58], Also, a2E is linked to the difference of two Young s moduli Es, and ET measured adiabatically and isothermally [59]. [Pg.333]

Reinforcing fillers can be deformed from their usual approximately spherical shapes in a number of ways. For example, if the particles are a glassy polymer such as polystyrene (PS), then deforming the matrix in which they reside at a... [Pg.371]

Annealing can reduce the creep of crystalline polymers in the same manner as for glassy polymers (89,94,102). For example, the properties of a quenched specimen of low-density polyethylene will still be changing a month after it is made. The creep decreases with time, while the density and modulus increase with time of aging at room temperature. However, for crystalline polymers such as polyethylene and polypropylene, both the annealing temperature and the test temperatures are generally between... [Pg.89]

As an example of composite core/shell submicron particles, we made colloidal spheres with a polystyrene core and a silica shell. The polar vapors preferentially affect the silica shell of the composite nanospheres by sorbing into the mesoscale pores of the shell surface. This vapor sorption follows two mechanisms physical adsorption and capillary condensation of condensable vapors17. Similar vapor adsorption mechanisms have been observed in porous silicon20 and colloidal crystal films fabricated from silica submicron particles32, however, with lack of selectivity in vapor response. The nonpolar vapors preferentially affect the properties of the polystyrene core. Sorption of vapors of good solvents for a glassy polymer leads to the increase in polymer free volume and polymer plasticization32. [Pg.80]

Cavitation is often a precursor to craze formation [20], an example of which is shown in Fig. 5 for bulk HDPE deformed at room temperature. It may be inferred from the micrograph that interlamellar cavitation occurs ahead of the craze tip, followed by simultaneous breakdown of the interlamellar material and separation and stretching of fibrils emanating from the dominant lamellae visible in the undeformed regions. The result is an interconnected network of cavities and craze fibrils with diameters of the order of 10 nm. This is at odds with the notion that craze fibrils in semicrystalline polymers deformed above Tg are coarser than in glassy polymers [20, 28], as well as with models for craze formation in which lamellar fragmentation constitutes an intermediate step [20, 29] but, as will be seen, it is difficult to generalise and a variety of mechanisms and structures is possible. [Pg.85]

Correlation of the permeation properties of a wide variety of polymers with their free volume is not possible [32], But, within a single class of materials, there is a correlation between the free volume of polymers and gas diffusion coefficients an example is shown in Figure 2.24 [33], The relationship between the free volume and the sorption and diffusion coefficients of gases in polymers, particularly glassy polymers, has been an area of a great deal of experimental and theoretical work. The subject has recently been reviewed in detail by Petropoulos [34] and by Paul and co-workers [35,36],... [Pg.58]

The experimental results described above show that the gas-permeability properties of thin glassy polymer films (submicrometer in thickness) are more time- or history-dependent than much thicker films (the bulk state for example, 50 pm or thicker) seem to be. This is manifested in terms of physical aging over a period of 1 year and more. The observed permeability values for the current thin films are all initially greater than the reported bulk values but approach or become less than these values after a few days or weeks, depending on the thickness. After a year, the thin films may be as much as four times less permeable than the reported bulk values. Selectivity increases with aging time, as might be expected from a densification process. [Pg.74]

Glassy polymers are, mostly, brittle (e.g. PS), unless, below room temperature, a secondary transition is present a strong example is PC, which shows a very high impact strength. Why such a transition is, below the temperature of use, still active,... [Pg.137]

Amorphous, glassy polymers, used far below their Tg, are cold-brittle if no other mechanisms are active an example is PS. If a polymer has been improved in impact strength by the addition of a rubbery phase (high-impact PS or PVC, ABS etc.), then the cold-brittleness temperature is related to the Tg of the added rubber. If the polymer shows a secondary transition in the glassy region (such as PC), then this governs the brittleness temperature. [Pg.144]

In a rubbery polymer with flexible macromolecular chains (PDMS for example) the cavities forming the free-volume are clearly separated from each other. The detailed evaluation of the movement of a penetrant particle from cavity (1) to the neighboring (2), did not show any immediate back jumps (2) — (1). This is mainly do to the fact that the channel between (1) and (2) closes quiet quickly. In a polymer with stiff chains (glassy polyimide (PI) for example) the individual cavities are closer to each other and a rather large number of immediate back jumps ocurred during the time interval simulated (120). This indicates that once a channel between two adjacent cavities in a stiff chain polymer is formed it will stay open for some 100 ps. This makes the back jump (2) - (1) of the penetrant more probable than a jump to any other adjacent hole (3). This process seems to be one cause for the general tendency that the diffusion coefficient of small penetrants in stiff chain glassy polymers is smaller than in flexible chain rubbery polymers. [Pg.144]


See other pages where Glassy polymers, examples is mentioned: [Pg.455]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.151]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.41 ]




SEARCH



Glassy polymers

© 2024 chempedia.info