Glass transition temperature upper

Figure 35. Glass transition temperature 7., (determined by dilatometry) and relaxation time r at 131°C as a function of annealing time in air at 180°C for a film thickness of 63 nm. The dotted lines serve as a guide for the reader. Inset Dilatometric determination of the glass transition temperature. Upper. Normalized capacitance Cn0nn versus temperature at 106Hz (the solid lines represent linear dependencies, the dotted line marks the position of the glass transition temperature). Lower. The corresponding first and second numerical derivatives of Cnonn (in arbitrary units) as a function of temperature.

Reactive compatibilization can also be accomplished by co-vulcanization at the interface of the component particles resulting in obliteration of phase boundary. For example, when cA-polybutadiene is blended with SBR (23.5% styrene), the two glass transition temperatures merge into one after vulcanization. Co-vulcanization may take place in two steps, namely generation of a block or graft copolymer during vulcanization at the phase interface and compatibilization of the components by thickening of the interface. However, this can only happen if the temperature of co-vulcanization is above the order-disorder transition and is between the upper and lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of the blend [20]. 

Values of the upper glass transition temperatures of the siloxane modified polyimides were found to be a function of both the level of incorporated siloxane as well as the siloxane molecular weight (Table II). The upper transition temperature of the solution... 

Figure 5. Logarithm of the retractive force at 49% strain (lower curve) and sample temperature (upper curve) plotted against logarithm of time reduced to 263 K. Cross-links are introduced at log t/aT is 3 in the glassy state where the spike on the force curve is due to thermal contraction upon cooling below the glass transition temperature. Equilibrium force at 263 K after cross-linking is feQ. (Reproduced, with permission, from Ref. 27. Copyright 1981, Journal of Chemical Physics.)...

Except for a lew thermoset materials, most plastics soften at some temperatures, At the softening or heat distortion temperature, plastics become easily deformahle and tend to lose their shape and deform quickly under a Load. Above the heat distortion temperature, rigid amorphous plastics become useless as structural materials. Thus the heat distortion test, which defines The approximate upper temperature at which the material can be Safely used, is an important test (4,5.7.24). As expected, lor amorphous materials the heat distortion temperature is closely related to the glass transition temperature, hut tor highly crystalline polymers the heat distortion temperature is generally considerably higher than the glass transition temperature. Fillers also often raise the heat distortion test well above... 

Among the spectrum of melt-spinnable fibers such as polyolefins and nylons, PET stands at the upper end in terms of crystalline melt temperature and glass transition temperature. This provides superior dimensional stability for applications where moderately elevated temperatures are encountered, e.g. in automobile tires or in home laundering and drying of garments. The high thermal stability results from the aromatic rings that hinder the mobility of the polymer chain. 

The lower limit of the elastic range, the glass transition temperature, can be easily determined by refractometric, volumetric, or other well known methods. The upper limit suffers from an exact definition the transition from the fixed liquid to the liquid state occurs without transformation. But as the viscosity decreases exponentially with the temperature it is very convenient to define a 1 flow-temperature by penetrometer measurements. If the rate of temperature rise is kept constant, this temperature is reproducible within 1° or 2°C. The penetrometer indicates a temperature where macroscopically one would call the substance liquid. ... 

As is well known, the glass-rubber transition is of considerable importance technologically. The glass transition temperature (Tg) determines the lower use limit of a rubber and the upper use limit of an amorphous thermoplastic material. With increasing molar mass the ease of "forming" (shaping) diminishes. 

According to Partridge [163], toughening is efficient when, by comparison to the neat homopolymer tested under the same conditions, the impact resistance is multiplied by a factor of 10, without losing more than 25% of stiffness. The upper temperature limit for the use of rubber-modified blends is controlled by the matrix melt temperature, Tm, their lower limit by the glass transition temperature, Tg, of the particles. As soon as the viscoelastic response of the latter is too slow to accommodate an external loading, the polymer assumes a glassy state and breaks in a brittle way. 

However, the concentration of PDP in the host PMMA matrix had to be low in order to avoid phase separation. This imposes an upper limit on the improvement in external efficiency in using bilayer OLEDs instead of mono-layer OLEDs. Therefore, there was a clear requirement for conjugated organic polymers with a stable, high glass transition temperature and a high affinity for electrons for use as an amorphous, non-crystalline ETL. 

---