Generator Brownian dynamics

The preceding discussion applied implicitly to what we classify as dynamical simulations — namely, those simulations in which all correlations in the final trajectory arise because each configuration is somehow generated from the previous one. This time-correlated picture applies to a broad class of algorithms MD, Langevin and Brownian dynamics, as well as traditional Monte Carlo (MC, also known as Markov-chain Monte Carlo). Even though MC may not lead to true physical dynamics, all the correlations are sequential. 

Figure 8.2 Phase separation in binary mixtures of model spherical particles at a planar interface generated by Brownian dynamics simulation. The three 2-D images refer to systems in which (A) light particles form irreversible bonds, (B) light particles form reversible bonds, and (C) neither dark nor light particles form bonds, but they repel each other. Picture D shows a 3-D representation. Reproduced from Pugnaloni et al. (2003b) with permission.

Molecular Dynamics simulation is one of many methods to study the macroscopic behavior of systems by following the evolution at the molecular scale. One way of categorizing these methods is by the degree of determinism used in generating molecular positions [134], On the scale from the completely stochastic method of Metropolis Monte Carlo to the pure deterministic method of Molecular Dynamics, we find a multitude and increasingly diverse number of methods to name just a few examples Force-Biased Monte Carlo, Brownian Dynamics, General Langevin Dynamics [135], Dissipative Particle Dynamics [136,137], Colli-sional Dynamics [138] and Reduced Variable Molecular Dynamics [139]. 

Brownian dynamics by generating trajectories starting from r = b and terminating them when the molecule collides with the reaction surface or the truncation surface at r = q is the fraction of molecules that collide with the... 

According to the fluctuation-dissipation theorem [1], the electrical polarizability of polyelectrolytes is related to the fluctuations of the dipole moment generated in the counterion atmosphere around the polyions in the absence of an applied electric field [2-4], Here we calculate the fluctuations by computer simulation to determine anisotropy of the electrical polarizability Aa of model DNA fragments in salt-free aqueous solutions [5-7]. The Metropolis Monte Carlo (MC) Brownian dynamics method [8-12] is applied to calculate counterion distributions, electric potentials, and fluctuations of counterion polarization. 

The Brownian dynamics method described above can be used to generate diffusional trajectories of a substrate in the field of an enzyme target. 

In these more complicated examples, we are able to demonstrate ergodicity without finding an explicit solution (as in the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck example) or study of the dynamics generator (as in Brownian dynamics), given some assumptions on the behavior of solutions. We state (without proof) a powerful theorem on the ergodicity of degenerate stochastic diffusions, whose proof is essentially contained in [257, Theorem 2.5] (see also [44, 160, 161, 253, 266]). We denote by Hfix) the open ball in D centered on the points of radius while B(D) is the Borel a-algebra on T) (see Sect. 5.2.1). 

The bead dynamics is realized by the integration of the equations of motion for the beads. A trajectory is generated through the system s phase space. All thermodynamic observables (e.g. density fields, order parameters, correlation functions, stress tensor, etc.) can be constructed from suitable averages. An immense advantage over conventional molecular dynamics and Brownian dynamics is that all forces are soft , thus allowing... 

The molecular dynamics approach allows for the simulation of the system components individually with atomic resolution. Broadly speaking, an appropriately constrained Newtonian dynamics is used to capture the evolution of particles representing individual ions, atoms, or groups of atoms in the force field generated by electrostatic and van der Waals interactions together with boundary conditions. One difference between molecular dynamics and Brownian dynamics is the way the solvent is modeled Water molecules are typically treated explicitly within the molecular dynamics framework. 

Different from the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation method (Sect. 4.5), the Brownian dynamics approach does not directly simulate the inter-particle collision. Instead, in the Brownian dynamics, the pseudorandom motion characteristic of the effect of particle-particle interactions is mimicked by a stochastic force generated from random numbers. This makes the Brownian dynamics more efficient than the... 

---