Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General Rate-Based Model

The rate-based analysis introduced in Section 14.2 can be developed as outlined below to define a general, rigorous, multi-component rate-based stage model. It takes into account mass and energy transfer between the phases within a stage, and can be connected to other stages to form multistage columns. [Pg.546]

Rate-based models are not limited to packed columns but can be applied to trayed [Pg.546]

Separate liquid phase and vapor phase component material balances, coupled with [Pg.547]

Mass transfer rate equations for both phases across the interface, [Pg.547]

Energy balances for both phases, coupled with [Pg.547]


The tray hydraulics model may be extended to include mass and heat transfer rates for calculating the liquid and vapor flow rates and compositions in trayed columns on the basis of a rate-based model. The objective is to more realistically represent the actual performance of the column by providing a basis for estimating a tray. For this approach to be practical, methods should be available for reliably predicting the mass and heat transfer rates. General rate-based models are also discussed in Chapter 15 for solving packed columns. [Pg.509]

From the above list of rate-based model equations, it is seen that they total 5C -t- 6 for each tray, compared to 2C -t-1 or 2C -t- 3 (depending on whether mole fractious or component flow rates are used for composition variables) for each stage in the equihbrium-stage model. Therefore, more computer time is required to solve the rate-based model, which is generally converged by an SC approach of the Newton type. [Pg.1292]

Some important general aspects of rate-based modeling as well as further peculiarities of the specific process applications and the different solution strategies are given in Appendices A and B. [Pg.362]

It is obvious from the conditions defined above that the rate-based model equations and variables are more numerous and complex than those in the equilibrium stage model described in Chapter 13. Other features of the rate-based model are that the exiting liquid and vapor from a stage can be at different temperatures since separate balance equations are written for each phase. Each phase on a stage can have a different externally transferred heat duty. The exiting phases in general are not at equilibrium the liquid may be subcooled and the vapor may be superheated. In a rate-based model the phase interface must be defined. The variables defining the interface include the liquid and vapor compositions and the temperature at the interface, and the molar flux across the interface. [Pg.547]

The amount of additional information needed to be able directly to take into account heat and mass transfer in Model 4 is high. Using the two-film theory, information on the film thickness is needed, which is usually condensed into correlations for the Sherwood number. That information was not available for Katapak-S so that correlations for similar non-reactive packing had to be adopted for that purpose. Furthermore, information on diffusion coefficients is usually a bottleneck. Experimental data is lacking in most cases. Whereas diffusion coefficients can generally be estimated for gas phases with acceptable accuracy, this does unfortunately not hold for liquid multicomponent systems. For a discussion, see Reid et al. [8] and Taylor and Krishna [9]. These drawbacks, which are commonly encountered in applications of rate-based models to reactive separations, limit our ability to judge their value as deviations between model predictions and experimen-... [Pg.68]

Equilibrium-based models are described by Knaebel (1991), and Knaebel and Hill (1985). Diffusion-rate-based models are described by Farooq and Ruthven (1991) and Shin and Knaebel (1987). Equilibrium-based separations are generally capable of producing a higher purity product and are, therefore, used for gas purification applications while PSA operations based on diffusion rates are more often applicable to bulk separations such as the production of oxygen and nitrogen from air. [Pg.1081]

Incorporation of viscosity variations in non-elastic generalized Newtonian flow models is based on using empirical rheological relationships such as the power law or Carreau equation, described in Chapter 1. In these relationships fluid viscosity is given as a function of shear rate and material parameters. Therefore in the application of finite element schemes to non-Newtonian flow, shear rate at the elemental level should be calculated and used to update the fluid viscosity. The shear rale is defined as the second invariant of the rate of deformation tensor as (Bird et at.., 1977)... [Pg.126]

Much of the study of kinetics constitutes a study of catalysis. The first goal is the determination of the rate equation, and examples have been given in Chapters 2 and 3, particularly Section 3.3, Model Building. The subsection following this one describes the dependence of rates on pH, and most of this dependence can be ascribed to acid—base catalysis. Here we treat a very simple but widely applicable method for the detection and measurement of general acid-base or nucleophilic catalysis. We consider aqueous solutions where the pH and p/f concepts are well understood, but similar methods can be applied in nonaqueous media. [Pg.268]

Recently, Praharso et al also developed a Langmuir-Hinshelwood type of kinetic model for the SR kinetics of i-Cg over a Ni-based catalyst. In their model, it was assumed that both the hydrocarbon and steam dissociatively chemisorb on two different dual sites on the catalyst surface. The bimolecular surface reaction between dissociated adsorbed species was proposed as the ratedetermining step. The following generalized rate expression was proposed ... [Pg.250]

Specifically, the major topics covered by this review are (1) a brief discussion of models of element release rates based on diffusion and on TST, and (2) glass-water reactions that dominate near equilibrium. We will discuss these themes with the assumption of some general understanding of chemical kinetics, but the concepts should be comprehensible to readers from outside this field as well. [Pg.580]

Recent modeling based on the lifetimes of stars, their IMF, the star formation rate as a function of time, and nucleosynthesis processes have succeeded in matching reasonably well the abundances of the elements in the solar system and in the galaxy as a whole (e.g. Timmes et al., 1995). These models are still very primitive and do not include nucleosynthesis in low and intermediate-mass stars. But the general agreement between model predictions and observations indicates that we understand the basic principles of galactic chemical evolution. [Pg.82]

There have been few studies reported in the literature in the area of multi-component adsorption and desorption rate modeling (1, 2,3., 4,5. These have generally employed simplified modeling approaches, and the model predictions have provided qualitative comparisons to the experimental data. The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive model for multi-component adsorption kinetics based on the following mechanistic process (1) film diffusion of each species from the fluid phase to the solid surface (2) adsorption on the surface from the solute mixture and (3) diffusion of the individual solute species into the interior of the particle. The model is general in that diffusion rates in both fluid and solid phases are considered, and no restrictions are made regarding adsorption equilibrium relationships. However, diffusional flows due to solute-solute interactions are assumed to be zero in both fluid and solid phases. [Pg.27]

Current generally applicable biodegradation models focus on the estimation of readily and nonreadily biodegradability in screening tests. This is because most experimental data are from such tests (e.g., MITI-I). There are far fewer data that are both quantitative and environmentally relevant (i.e., measured half-lives or rate constants). However, individual transformations and pathways are well documented in the literature. This allows for development of explicitly mechanistic models, making use of established group-contribution approaches, hierarchic rule-based expert systems, and probabilistic evaluation of possible transformation pathways. [Pg.330]

The first limitation is that the landscape models are very abstract. Their results apply to molecular search in a general way, but are difficult to relate to laboratory concerns. Ideally, future work will combine the mathematical rigor of landscape-based search with the chemical and experimental details of the laboratory technique-based models. Some work along these lines has started with calculating mutation rates for SELEX schemes based on RNA secondary structure landscape models [114],... [Pg.147]

For the system (2.36), in the limit e —> 0, the term (l/sjkfx) becomes indeterminate. For rate-based chemical and physical process models, this allows a physical interpretation in the limit when the large parameters in the rate expressions approach infinity, the fast heat and mass transfer, reactions, etc., approach the quasi-steady-state conditions of phase and/or reaction equilibrium (specified by k(x) = 0). In this case, the rates of the fast phenomena, as given by the explicit rate expressions, become indeterminate (but, generally, remain different from zero i.e., the fast reactions and heat and mass transfer do still occur). [Pg.23]

The so-called rate-based stage model presents a different way to the modeling of separation processes, by directly considering actual mass and heat transfer rates (Seader, 1989 Taylor and Krishna, 1993). A number of models fall into the general framework of the rate-based stage. In most cases, the film (Lewis and Whitman, 1924) or penetration and surface renewal (Higbie, 1935 Danckwerts, 1951) models find application, whereas the necessary model parameters are estimated by means of correlations. In this respect, the film model appears advantageous due to numerous correlation data available in the literature (see, e.g., Billet and Schultes, 1999). [Pg.4]


See other pages where General Rate-Based Model is mentioned: [Pg.546]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.1730]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.1724]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.1134]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.187]   


SEARCH



General base

General rate model

Generalization model

Model, generalized

Models rate model

Rate general

Rate-based model

Ratings models

© 2024 chempedia.info