Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General Conclusions from Sect

Taking all the material presented in Sect. 3 together we arrive at some general conclusions. [Pg.31]

These relations have been partly commented upon in the preceding text. Since the Stokes shift for these complexes does not relate to one and the same transition (singlet-singlet in excitation, triplet-singlet in emission), we do not discuss its relation to other properties further. [Pg.31]

In tetrahedral complexes of a given metal ion the occurrence of luminescence depends often on the nature of the surrounding cation (compare the discussion at the end of Sect. 3.2). The Stokes shift tends to be larger for lower Tq. This is a Ar effect (see Fig. 8). [Pg.32]

These rules should now be put on a more quantitative basis which is probably made possible by the introduction of a method to calculate the temperature dependence of nonradiative transitions by Struck and Fonger ), This has been performed recently for the octahedral uranate group by Bleijenberg and Breddels ). [Pg.32]


While the detailed discussion of the flow curves and their asymptotics leads beyond the present review, see [86], the important conclusions from Fig. 17 in the present context are that the universal aspects discussed in Sect. 4 are recovered, that qualitative agreement is obtained with the results of the ISHSM, and that analytical expressions for the flow curves can be obtained. For example, the critical flow curve follows a generalized Herschel-Bulkley law ... [Pg.104]

This review aims to understand the properties of artificial metal-DNA complexes from the view of theoretical chemistry. In Sect. 25.2, we introduce computational method to evaluate the stacking energy between base pairs by means of the DFT-based method and show the benchmark test for usefulness of the ALL functional with LC scheme [20]. In Sect. 25.3, we focused on the metal-containing artificial DNA and will discuss the structure of it by using of ALL functional with LC scheme and stability by a polarizable continuum model (PCM) [21,22]. In Sect. 25.4, we investigated the electron conductivity of natural and artificial DNAs with simple model [23], which had been proposed by Luo et al. [24]. Finally, general conclusion is given in Sect. 25.5. [Pg.435]

This chapter is subdivided into a number of sections. This section provides a general background to the development and application of the FEM. O Section 25.2 provides the fundamentals of the method and O Sect. 25.3 discusses some of the practical aspects of finite element modelling. O Section 25.4 discusses application of the FEM to adhesively bonded joints and O Sect. 25.5 provides conclusions from the chapter and indicates potential future developments in the application of FEA to bonded joints. [Pg.631]

The second conclusion concerns the difference Ar = rB...Hx(Z - X)-rB. -xy(Z X) between the Z to X distances in the two series B- HX and B- XY. Ar is positive and nearly constant for a given B and X, when XY is CI2, Br2, BrCl or ClF. Since the order of the internuclear distances is r(XY) > r(HX) for any given atom X, this result means the outer atom Y of the dihalogen molecule XY is always more distant from a given point in B for the complex B- XY than is the atom X from the same reference point in B for the complex B- HX. This second general result is relevant to the discussion of linear versus non-linear hydrogen and halogen bonds in Sect. 6. [Pg.57]

All the mentioned types of the nontrivial dynamic behavior are excluded for the systems where the reactivity ratios ry can be described by the expressions of the well-known Alfrey-Price Q-e scheme [20], and as a result they are to follow the simplified terminal model (see Sect. 4.6). In these systems, due to the relations Bj(X)/Bj(x) = ajj/ajj which holds for all i and j, the functions 7e,-(2) according to relations (4.10) are the ratios of the homogeneous polynomials of degree 2. Besides, for the calculations of the coefficients ak of Eq. (5.11) one can use the simple formulae presented in terms of determinants Dj and D [6, p. 265]. The theoretical analysis [202] leads to the conclusion that in such systems even the limited cycles are not possible and all azeotropes are certainly unstable. Hence any trajectory H(p) and X(p) when p -> 1 inevitably approaches the SP corresponding to the homopolymer the number of which can be from 1 to m. The set of systems obtained due to the classification within the framework of the simplified model essentially impoverishes in comparison with the general case of the terminal copolymerization model since some types of systems cannot be principally realized under the restrictions which the Q-e scheme puts on the reactivity ratios r. ... [Pg.50]

Let us also note that MER has been used to interpret the high similarity of the SoS r-abundances between Ba and Os and those observed in r-process-rich metal-poor stars. This situation is generally interpreted as the signature of a universality of the r-process (see Sect. 6.4). As reviewed by [24], the main conclusions drawn from the MER results are that (I) the pattern of abundances in the Ba to Os range is mainly governed by nuclear physics properties (and in particular by the fact that even Z elements have more stable isotopes that can be fed by the r-process). If this is indeed true, a possible... [Pg.313]

The Ginzburg-Landau equation possesses a family of plane wave solutions. They are considered to be a special form of the plane waves whose existence was proved by Kopell and Howard (1973 a) for oscillatory reaction-diffusion systems in general. In view of the physical situation where the Ginzburg-Landau equation arises, the plane waves of Kopell and Howard are expected to reduce to this special form as the point of Hopf bifurcation (of the supercritical type) is approached from above. One of the important conclusions to be drawn below is that all the family of plane waves (including uniform oscillation as a special plane wave) can happen to be unstable, which is a property not shared by the A - co system with a diagonal diffusion matrix, see Sect. 2.4. [Pg.141]


See other pages where General Conclusions from Sect is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.2145]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.89]   


SEARCH



Conclusion

General conclusion

© 2024 chempedia.info