Fundamental Interaction Energy Components

As the understanding of chemical bonding was advanced through such concepts as covalent and ionic bond, lone electron pairs etc., the theory of intermolecular forces also attempted to break down the interaction energy into a few simple and physically sensible concepts. To describe the nonrelativistic intermolecular interactions it is sufficient to express them in terms of the aforementioned four fundamental components electrostatic, induction, dispersion and exchange energies. 

---

The currently implemented level of SAPT represents the four fundamental interaction energy components by the following expansions ... 

The details of SAPT are beyond the scope of the present work. For our purposes it is enough to say that the fundamental components of the interaction energy are ordinarily expanded in terms of two perturbations the intermonomer interaction operator and the intramonomer electron correlation operator. Such a treatment provides us with fundamental components in the form of a double perturbation series, which should be judiciously limited to some low order, which produces a compromise between efficiency and accuracy. The most important corrections for two- and three-body terms in the interaction energy are described in Table 1. The SAPT corrections are directly related to the interaction energy evaluated by the supermolecular approach, Eq.(2), provided that many body perturbation theory (MBPT) is used [19,28]. Assignment of different perturbation and supermolecular energies is shown in Table 1. The power of this approach is its open-ended character. One can thoroughly analyse the role of individual corrections and evaluate them with carefully controlled effort and desired... 

To describe the composition of the PES from well defined and physically sensible fundamental parts, we briefly describe our recent results for the Ar-C02 complex [43], The coordinates for this complex are shown in Fig. 4.A The geometry of C02 was kept rigid. The interaction energy perturbation components are also shown in Fig. 4, for R = 3.7 A. 

The water dimer is the most important H-bonded system. The major attractive contribution to the interaction energy of the water dimer is the electrostatic effect. It dominates over other attractive terms, such as the induction and dispersion energies, and it is the most anisotropic. To discuss the properties of the fundamental components in the water dimer case we chose to demonstrate the angular dependence of various terms in the dimer geometry derived from the cyclic configuration of a trimer (see Fig 6). 

The operative component of the comprehensive hydrophobic effect arises from the competition between charged and oil-like groups. This was shown to result in a previously unknown repulsive force embodied within an interaction energy called an apolar-polar repulsive free energy of hydration, AG,p. During function, AG,p works in conjunction with elastic force development by the restriction of internal chain dynamics. These have been called the hydrophobic and elastic consilient mechanisms. In Chapters 6,7, and 8, these consilient mechanisms were demonstrated to be fundamental to understanding the functions of biology s proteins. 

Although, very often, the lower surface energy component tends to segregate to the surface, a number of other factors - such as solvent, specific interaction and crystallization - can also affect the blend s surface composition [4,5]. Consequently, whilst an understanding of the blend surface composition is of fundamental interest, it may not be easy to acquire. Implied is the simultaneous requirement for chemical speciation at both high lateral and depth resolution within the surface region. 

Adsorption of bath components is a necessary and possibly the most important and fundamental detergency effect. Adsorption (qv) is the mechanism whereby the interfacial free energy values between the bath and the soHd components (sofld soil and substrate) of the system are lowered, thereby increasing the tendency of the bath to separate the soHd components from one another. Furthermore, the soHd components acquire electrical charges that tend to keep them separated, or acquire a layer of strongly solvated radicals that have the same effect. If it were possible to foUow the adsorption effects in a detersive system, in all their complex ramifications and interactions, the molecular picture of soil removal would be greatly clarified. 

In a fundamental sense, the miscibility, adhesion, interfacial energies, and morphology developed are all thermodynamically interrelated in a complex way to the interaction forces between the polymers. Miscibility of a polymer blend containing two polymers depends on the mutual solubility of the polymeric components. The blend is termed compatible when the solubility parameter of the two components are close to each other and show a single-phase transition temperature. However, most polymer pairs tend to be immiscible due to differences in their viscoelastic properties, surface-tensions, and intermolecular interactions. According to the terminology, the polymer pairs are incompatible and show separate glass transitions. For many purposes, miscibility in polymer blends is neither required nor de-... 

From the viewpoint of molecular interactions, the number of fundamentally distinct chromatographic stationary phases is very limited.17 One mechanism for adsorption to the stationary phase is solvophobic, or mobilestationary phase transfer free energy effects, in which the adsorption of an analyte to the stationary phase liberates bound solvent. There is often an accompanying enthalpic component to such binding through dispersion interactions. Another mechanism for adsorption is that of specific interactions,... 

---