Free-radicals substitution, definition

The concept of captodative substitution implies the simultaneous action of a captor (acceptor) and a donor substituent on a molecule. Furthermore, in the definition of Viehe et al. (1979), which was given for free radicals, both substituents are bonded to the same or to two vinylogous carbon atoms, i.e. 1,1- and 1,3-substitution, and so forth is considered. One might, however, also include 1,2-, 1,4-,. .. disubstitution, a situation which is more often referred to as push-pull substitution. Before discussing captodative substituent effects it might be helpful to analyse the terms capto and dative in more detail. 

If the reduction of C—C BDEs by captodative substitution is interpreted with the appropriate caution, it can be stated that a conclusive answer as to the existence of a captodative effect in free radicals cannot be derived from these studies, If, furthermore, a consequent error-propagation analysis had been carried out, the outcome might have been that the error limits do not allow a definitive conclusion. However, the results convey a feeling that— regardless of the pros and cons for the different determination procedures— a possible captodative effect will not be great. 

We consider as dihydro derivatives those rings which contain either one or two 5p3-hybridized carbon atoms. According to this definition, all reactions of the aromatic compounds with electrophiles, nucleophiles or free radicals involve dihydro intermediates. Such reactions with electrophiles afford Wheland intermediates which usually easily lose H+ to re-aromatize. However, nucleophilic substitution (in the absence of a leaving group such as halogen) gives an intermediate which must lose H and such intermediates often possess considerable stability. Radical attack at ring carbon affords another radical which usually reacts further rapidly. In this section we consider the reactions of isolable dihydro compounds it is obvious that much of the discussion on the aromatic heterocycles is concerned with dihydro derivatives as intermediates. 

In contrast to this the mechanism of the homolytic substitution of aromatic compounds is by no means clear. This can be demonstrated by two examples. In Walling s book Free Radicals in Solution published in 1957, three different mechanisms for the phenylation of benzene by benzoyl peroxide are discussed (pages 482-487), no definite differentiation based on direct experimental evidence being possible at that time. On the other hand, it was only in 1958, that new products in addition to biphenyl were identified for the decomposition of benzoyl peroxide in benzene solution when DeTar and Long (1958) isolated l, 4, l ,4"-tetrahydro-p-quaterphenyl (8) and 1,4-dihydrobiphenyl (9). 

---