Fractionated crystallization in block copolymers

Muller AJ, Balsamo V, Arnal ML, Jakob T, SchmalzH, Abetz V. Homogeneous nucleation and fractionated crystallization in block copolymers. Macromolecules 2002 35(8) 3048-58. 

The technique of self-nucleation can be very useful to study the nucleation and crystallization of block copolymers that are able to crystallize [29,97-103]. Previous works have shown that domain II or the exclusive self-nucleation domain disappears for systems where the crystallizable block [PE, PEO or poly(e-caprolactone), PCL] was strongly confined into small isolated MDs [29,97-101]. The need for a very large number of nuclei in order to nucleate crystals in every confined MD (e.g., of the order of 1016 nuclei cm 3 in the case of confined spheres) implies that the amount of material that needs to be left unmolten is so large that domain II disappears and annealing will always occur to a fraction of the polymer when self-nucleation is finally attained at lower Ts. This is a direct result of the extremely high number density of MDs that need to be self-nucleated when the crystallizable block is confined within small isolated MDs. Although this effect has been mainly studied in ABC triblock copolymers and will be discussed in Sect. 6.3, it has also been reported in PS-fc-PEO diblock copolymers [29,99]. 

The technique of self-nucleation [75] can be very useful to study the nucleation and crystallization of block copolymer components, as already mentioned in previous sections. In block copolymers, factors like the volumetric fraction and the degree of segregation affect the type of confinement and therefore modify the self-nucleation behavior. In the case of semicrystalline block copolymers, several works have reported the self-nucleation of either one or both crystallizable components in PS-fc-PCL, PS-b-PB-b-PCL, PS-b-PE-b-PCL, PB-fr-PIB-fr-PEO, PE-fr-PEP-fr-PEO, PS-fc-PEO, PS-h-PEO-h-PCL, PB-b-PEO, PB/PB-fc-PEO and PPDX-fc-PCL [29,92,98,99,101-103,134] and three different kinds of behavior have been observed. Specific examples of these three cases are given in the following and in Table 5 ... 

We note that earlier research focused on the similarities of defect interaction and their motion in block copolymers and thermotropic nematics or smectics [181, 182], Thermotropic liquid crystals, however, are one-component homogeneous systems and are characterized by a non-conserved orientational order parameter. In contrast, in block copolymers the local concentration difference between two components is essentially conserved. In this respect, the microphase-separated structures in block copolymers are anticipated to have close similarities to lyotropic systems, which are composed of a polar medium (water) and a non-polar medium (surfactant structure). The phases of the lyotropic systems (such as lamella, cylinder, or micellar phases) are determined by the surfactant concentration. Similarly to lyotropic phases, the morphology in block copolymers is ascertained by the volume fraction of the components and their interaction. Therefore, in lyotropic systems and in block copolymers, the dynamics and annihilation of structural defects require a change in the local concentration difference between components as well as a change in the orientational order. Consequently, if single defect transformations could be monitored in real time and space, block copolymers could be considered as suitable model systems for studying transport mechanisms and phase transitions in 2D fluid materials such as membranes [183], lyotropic liquid crystals [184], and microemulsions [185],... 

Many papers have been published in the last 20 years that deal with fractionated crystallization and confined crystallization in polymer blends or in block copolymers blended with homopolymers. Some of these studies are briefly mentioned here while more recent works are treated in more detail. 

Rytter et al. reported polymerizations with the dual precatalyst system 14/15 in presence of MAO [30]. Under ethylene-hexene copolymerization conditions, 14/MAO produced a polymer with 0.7 mol% hexene, while the 15/MAO gave a copolymer with ca. 5 mol% hexene. In the mixed catalyst system, the activity and comonomer incorporation were approximate averages of what would be expected for the two catalysts. Using crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis, it was concluded in a later paper by Rytter that the material was a blend containing no block copolymer [31],... 

Figure 1 shows the DSC cooling scan of iPP in the bulk after self-nucleation at a self-seeding temperature Ts of 162 °C (in domain II). The self-nucleation process provides a dramatic increase in the number of nuclei, such that bulk iPP now crystallizes at 136.2 °C after the self-nucleation process this means with an increase of 28 °C in its peak crystallization temperature. In order to produce an equivalent self-nucleation of the iPP component in the 80/20 PS/iPP blend a Ts of 161 °C had to be employed. After the treatment at Ts, the cooling from Ts shows clearly in Fig. 1 that almost every iPP droplet can now crystallize at much higher temperatures, i.e., at 134.5 °C. Even though the fractionated crystallization has disappeared after self-nucleation, it should also be noted that the crystallization temperature in the blend case is nearly 2 °C lower than when the iPP is in the bulk this indicates that when the polymer is in droplets the process of self-nucleation is slightly more difficult than when it is in the bulk. In the case of block copolymers when the crystallization is confined in nanoscopic spheres or cylinders it will be shown that self-nucleation is so difficult that domain II disappears. 

As mentioned in Sect. 3, for PEO it has been found that the crystallization temperature is often a function of the MD volume. The examples quoted in Sect. 3 referred to PEO dispersed in droplets or to PEO that was a component within diblock copolymers. For other block copolymer components like PCL the variation in Tc encountered upon MD size increase is not as pronounced. Nojima et al. [22] found that the variation of Tc for PB-fo-PCL block copolymers with spherical PCL MDs of increasing sizes, ranging from 10.3 to 17.4 nm, was of about 5 °C for crystallization at very large supercoolings (Tc fluctuated between - 50 and - 45 °C approximately). For ABC triblock copolymers, Muller et al. [29], Schmalz et al. [101,119] and Balsamo et al. [118] found, by studying copolymers with minority components of PEO or PCL blocks linked to a rubbery block, that the Tc associated with fractionated... 

The homopolymer of DMP dissolves readily in methylene chloride but precipitates on standing as a crystalline polymer-CH2Cl2 complex, providing a method for distinguishing between block copolymers and mixtures of homopolymers. Random copolymers prepared by methods a and b form stable solutions in methylene chloride. Copolymers with a 1 1 ratio of DMP and DPP prepared by methods c and d also yield stable methylene chloride solutions. Since the NMR spectrum shows that the DMP portion of these materials is present as a block and the solubility in methylene chloride shows that DMP homopolymer is absent, these copolymers have the block structure. They can be separated by crystallization from m-xylene into an insoluble DPP-rich fraction and a soluble DMP-rich fraction, both fractions having the NMR spectra characteristic of block copolymers. A typical 1 1 copolymer prepared by adding DMP to growing DPP polymer yielded 35% of insoluble material... 

---