Fractional removal

These opposing tendencies may defeat the purpose of the fractional precipitation process. The fractional precipitation of crystalline polymers such as nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, high-melting polyamides, and polyvinylidene chloride consequently is notoriously inefficient, unless conditions are so chosen as to avoid the separation of the polymer in semicrystalline form. Intermediate fractions removed in the course of fractional precipitation may even exceed in molecular weight those removed earlier. Separation by fractional extraction should be more appropriate for crystalline polymers inasmuch as both equilibrium solubility and rate of solution favor dissolution of the components of lowest molecular weight remaining in the sample. 

In a typical experiment, paired reactions will be performed where either mRNA or RM are absent, to confirm that all translation products derive from the intended mRNA and reflect the activity of ER-bound ribosomes. As an additional control, mock translations can be performed and the membrane fraction removed by centrifugation (10 min, 60K, TLA100.2 rotor). The supernatant is then recovered, programmed with mRNA, and... 

The volatile fraction as defined by the various wet oxidation methods and most of the direct injection methods would be that fraction removed by acidification and purging with inert gas at room temperature. In the freeze-drying method of Gordon and Sutcliffe [29] the volatile fraction is that fraction lost by sublimation in vacuo. There have been no actual determinations of these losses, and for the most part Skopintsev s numbers were accepted as valid for all of these methods, largely because they are the only numbers available. 

Figure 12. Comparison of the observed Cd(II) fractional removal f = [Cd(II). g/Cd(II)T] with model results incorporating different characteristics of x- Open circles Kurbatov coefficients for end-members (Tltania Xr = 0.99, pKj, = 1.77 Amorphous Iron ...

The fraction of particles removed by the ESP as a function of diameter is also shown in Figure 9. Removal efficiency is greatest for 2.3 ym diameter particles (70%). The fraction removed at all diameters is considerably less than that removed after applying additives. The theoretical removal efficiency curve for an ESP as a function of diameter has a minimum at about 0.25 un (13,14) however, experimental observations show the minimum to actually range between 2 to 5 ym (15). Thus, the removal efficiency of the ESP observed here is consistent with similar measurements reported in the literature. 

Figure 9. Reduction in number of dust particles in card room as a function of diameter. Fraction removed compared with control when processing cotton with 0.60% Milube N-32 applied fn), 0.48% Texspray applied fAl, and electrostatic precipitator in filter system (O).

A direction can also be specified with the cell coordinates in square brackets, with commas and fractions removed ... 

To change a percent to a fraction, remove the percent sign and write the number over 100. Then reduce if possible. Example Change 4% to a fraction. 

This equation can be used for the calculation of the fractional removal of B from the gas only by reaction. This does not account for B that might be removed from the effluent liquid (Smith, 1981). 

Shell Stills. At the beginning of the period under review, large quantities of crude oil were processed in tower stills. These were cylindrical vessels 10 to 15 feet in diameter and about 40 feet long. The vessels were mounted horizontally and arranged so that a fire could be applied to the underside (10, 55). The stills were charged with crude oil and the appropriate fractions removed by distillation. The residue was then destructively distilled or coked. Heating was continued until the bottom of the still was at a dull red heat (55). 

Fig. 2 Two methods of sample preparation selectivity by polarity or by molecular size. Fractionation by polarity, e.g., using Florisil (vertical fraction), selects a limited range of the pesticides but does not remove high-molecular-weight materials of similar polarity. GPC (horizontal fraction) removes primarily material of high molecular weight, leaving all the pesticides (and other compounds of similar molecular weight) in the fraction. (From Ref. 19.)...

The Chevron deasphalted oil hydrotreating process is designed to desulfurize heavy feedstocks that have had the asphaltene fraction removed by prior application of a deasphalting process (Chapter 7). The principal product is a low-sulfur fuel oil that can be used as a blending stock or as a feedstock for a fluid catalytic unit (Table 9-7). 

Non-cushioned coal is a coal sample having an initial size range -76.2 + 50.8 mm, which was used for repeated drops, and has the fines component (—16.0 mm size fraction) removed after each drop. 

The deactivation of a Fischer-Tropsch precipitated iron catalyst has been investigated by means of a novel reactor study. After use of the catalyst in a single or dual pilot plant reactor, sections of the catalyst were transferred to microreactors for further activity studies. Microreactor activity studies revealed maximum activity for catalyst fractions removed from the region situated 20 - 30% from the top of the pilot plant reactor. Catalyst characterization by means of elemental analyses, XRD, surface area and pore size measurements revealed that (1 deactivation of the catalyst in the top 25% of the catalyst bed was mainly due to sulphur poisoning (2) deactivation of the catalyst in the middle and lower portions of the catalyst bed was due to catalyst sintering and conversion of the iron to Fe304, Both these latter phenomena were due to the action of water produced in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. 

Fraction removed by Solvent 2 containing compound of interest - collect for further analysis... 

Table 9 — Organic HAPs Subject to Wastewater Provisions for Process Units at New and Existing Sources and Corresponding Fraction Removed (Fr) Values Fr = 0.99 ...

HydrogenadoB. The withdrawal stream from vacuum distillation is hydrogenated to remove the residual hydroperoxide and to convert the acetophenone. Fractionation removes the ethylbenzene and then the phenyl-1 ethanol from the hydrogenation effluent The separation of ethylbenzene must be carefiiUy effected to avoid subsequent superffactio-nation in the presence of styrene. 

Note that this equation does not state that the velocity Vp must be terminal. It only states that the fractional removal R is directly proportional to the settling velocity Vp. For discrete settling, this velocity is the terminal settling velocity. For flocculent settling (to be discussed later), this velocity would be the average settling velocity of all particles at any particular instant of time. 

As shown in this equation, the fractional removal R is a function of the settling velocity Vp. The question is that if the settling is flocculent, what would be the value of the Vp In discrete settling, the velocity is terminal and since the velocity is terminal, the velocity substituted into the equation is the terminal settling velocity. In the case of flocculent settling, would the velocity to be substituted also be terminal ... 

R Fractional removal of particles also, recirculation ratio Re Reynolds number... 

From Eqs. (10.14) and (10.15), the equivalent mass of CaO is CaO/2. Thus, the mass of CaO, Mcaocanco, needed to neutralize the calcium bicarbonate is Mcaeco,/ (Ca(HC03)2/2)(Ca0/2). Let MT-caHco, be the total calcium bicarbonate in the raw water and /caeco, be its fractional removal. Thus, Mcaeco, = /caeco, rcaeco, and... 

---