Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fourier Integral Methods

In chemical engineering, the use of Fourier integrals to solve problems is not as popular as separation of variables or Laplace transform. This is due to the fact that the incorporation of the boundary conditions associated with a particular application can usually be very challenging. For instance, consider a slab of finite thickness undergoing some heat transfer phenomena. Suppose the phenomena can be described by [Pg.238]

using Fourier transforms. Equation 6.134 becomes  [Pg.238]

Application of Equation 5.62 gives the inverse transform cosh (ct)2 + io)V)y exp (itax)dta [Pg.239]

However, at this point it is not obvious how the conditions given by Equation 6.136 and Equation 6.137 are to be used. [Pg.239]

There are some cases of practical value for which Fourier integrals can be helpful. For example, consider a semi-infinite thin slab whose surface is insulated. Suppose that the surface temperature of the bar is initially /(x), and a temperature of zero degrees is suddenly applied to the end x = 0 and is maintained. [Pg.239]


We will describe integral equation approximations for the two-particle correlation fiinctions. There is no single approximation that is equally good for all interatomic potentials in the 3D world, but the solutions for a few important models can be obtained analytically. These include the Percus-Yevick (PY) approximation [27, 28] for hard spheres and the mean spherical (MS) approximation for charged hard spheres, for hard spheres with point dipoles and for atoms interacting with a Yukawa potential. Numerical solutions for other approximations, such as the hypemetted chain (EfNC) approximation for charged systems, are readily obtained by fast Fourier transfonn methods... [Pg.478]

The solutions to this approximation are obtained numerically. Fast Fourier transfonn methods and a refomuilation of the FINC (and other integral equation approximations) in tenns of the screened Coulomb potential by Allnatt [M are especially useful in the numerical solution. Figure A2.3.12 compares the osmotic coefficient of a 1-1 RPM electrolyte at 25°C with each of the available Monte Carlo calculations of Card and Valleau [ ]. [Pg.495]

Path integrals can be expressed directly in Cartesian coordinates [1, 2] or can be transformed to Fourier variables [1,2,20,45]. A Fourier path integral method will be used here [20]. The major reason for doing this is that length scales are directly built... [Pg.394]

Mielke, S. L. Truhlar, D. G., A new Fourier path integral method, a more general scheme for extrapolation, and comparison of eight path integral methods for the quantum mechanical calculation of free energies, J. Chem. Phys. 2001,114, 621-630... [Pg.422]

It should be noted that the expressions for IC and ISC cases Eqs. (71) and (72) are quite similar except for the electronic matrix elements and energy gaps. Although the Fourier integral involved in Wl fb given above can easily be carried out numerically, analytical expressions are often desired for this purpose, the method of steepest-descent [45-51] (saddle-point method) is commonly used. Take Eq. (73) as an example. Wl b will first be written as... [Pg.196]

Olvera de la Cruz and Sanchez [76] were first to report theoretical calculations concerning the phase stability of graft and miktoarm AnBn star copolymers with equal numbers of A and B branches. The static structure factor S(q) was calculated for the disordered phase (melt) by expanding the free energy, in terms of the Fourier transform of the order parameter. They applied path integral methods which are equivalent to the random phase approximation method used by Leibler. For the copolymers considered S(q) had the functional form S(q) 1 = (Q(q)/N)-2% where N is the total number of units of the copolymer chain, % the Flory interaction parameter and Q a function that depends specifically on the copolymer type. S(q) has a maximum at q which is determined by the equation dQ/dQ=0. [Pg.110]

However, the authors do not claim that these three main strategic lines in company of CETO functions constitute the unique way nor the best path to solve the molecular integral problem directed to find plausible substitutes of GTO functions. Other integration methods to deal with the present discussion can be used and analyzed, for instance Fourier, Laplace or Gauss transform methodology or any other possible choices and techniques available in the modem mathematical panoply. [Pg.121]

Doll, J. D., Beck, T. L., and Ereeman, D. L., Equilibrium and dynamical Fourier path integral methods. Adv. Chem. Phys. 78, 61-127 (1990). [Pg.217]

There have been two principal methods developed to evaluate the kinetic energy using path integral methods. One method, based on Eq. (3.5), has been termed the T-method and the other, based on Eq. (4.1), has bwn termed the //-method. In discretized path integral calculations the T-method and the //-method have similar properties, but in the Fourier method the expressions and the behavior of the kinetic energy evaluated by Monte Carlo techniques are different. [Pg.158]

In conclusion let us notice that asymptotic formulae allow us, on one hand, to understand better the physical principles of the method, while on the other hand, they permit us to avoid the calculation of Fourier integral at large times. The latter operation due to the oscillation nature of the integrand is related with great numerical difficulties. [Pg.502]

From a numerical point of view, equation (40) is integrated with a simple first-order integration method in parallel with the quantum propagation within the low-dimensional Hilbert space. Due to the periodicity of the surface potential, the quantum propagation was performed using a two-dimensional Fourier basis for the X and Y degrees of freedom. [Pg.342]

D. L. Freeman and J. D. Doll, j. Chem. Phys., 101, 848 (1984). Fourier Path Integral Methods for the Calculation of the Microcanonical Density of States. [Pg.176]

The algorithms most fi equently used for calculation of fractal coefficients from the AFM results are [58] Fourier spectrum integral method, surface-perimeter method, structural function method and variable method. To determine the surface dimension by the Fourier spectrum integral method it is necessary to obtain the picture of the surface 2D FFT generating amplitude and time of the matrix (more detail s are given in paper [58]. Assuming the surface function as f(x,y), the Fourier transform in two-dimensional space can be expressed as [58] ... [Pg.358]

Output signal of a simulated raw EMG (with sinusoidal intensity function) using the integration method and after an adaptive Fourier filtering according to Equation 1. [Pg.89]

Explicit evaluation of this sum is straightforward, because each term is a convolution integral. Using Fourier transform methods, it can easily be shown that... [Pg.24]


See other pages where Fourier Integral Methods is mentioned: [Pg.238]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.98]   


SEARCH



Fourier integral

Fourier integration

Fourier path integral Monte Carlo method

Fourier spectrum integral method

Integration method

© 2024 chempedia.info