Fourier analysis autocorrelation function

Another view of this theme was our analysis of spectral densities. A comparison of LN spectral densities, as computed for BPTI and lysozyme from cosine Fourier transforms of the velocity autocorrelation functions, revealed excellent agreement between LN and the explicit Langevin trajectories (see Fig, 5 in [88]). Here we only compare the spectral densities for different 7 Fig. 8 shows that the Langevin patterns become closer to the Verlet densities (7 = 0) as 7 in the Langevin integrator (be it BBK or LN) is decreased. 

We now move to a dynamical analysis of the time series for these distances. In the left panel of Fig. 17, we show the Fourier transforms of the 0-5 -0-4 distance autocorrelation function, and of the 0-5 -0-4, 0-4 -0P distance-distance correlation function. The spectra are very similar, indicating that 0-5 —0-4 and 0-4 Op... 

A Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function of a stochastic process gives the power spectrum function which shows the strength or energy of the process as a function of frequency [17]. Frequency analysis of a stochastic process is based on the assumption that it contains features changing at different frequencies, and thus it can be described using sine and cosine functions having the same frequencies [16]. The power spectrum is defined in terms of the covariance function of the process, Vk = Cov(e,. et k). as... 

Modification is performed by separating the harmonics from the spectral envelope, but this is achieved in a way that doesn t perform explicit source/filter separation as with LP analysis. The spectral envelope can be found by a number of numerical techniques. For example, Kain [244] transforms the spectra into a power spectrum and then uses an inverse Fourier transform to find the time domain autocorrelation function. LP analysis is performed on this to give an allpole representation of the spectral envelope. This has a number of advantages over standard LP analysis in that the power spectrum can be weighted so as to emphasise the perceptually important parts of the spectrum. Other techniques use peak picking in the spectrum to determine the spectral envelope. Once the envelope has been found, the harmonics can be moved in the frequency domain and new amplitudes found from the envelope. From this, the standard synthesis algorithm can be used to generate waveforms. 

The correlation will be maximal if one signal can be displaced with respect to the other until they fluctuate together. The correlation function c(t) will be a more or less noisy sine wave symmetrical around t = 0. The decay of the amplitude envelope from t = 0 indicates the degree of correlation the slower the decay, the higher the correlation. If fi(t) = f2(t), autocorrelation is done by delaying a copy of the function itself and perform the integration of Eq. 8.34. The process will be much the same as a Fourier analysis, a search for periodicity. 

As a result, we obtain the convolution of the density functirai p(r) with the same function inverted with respect of the origin of the reference frame p( r). Note that the minus sign appears due to different signs in the exponents for two complex conjugates in (5.28). The P(r) function is known as density autocorrelation function or the Paterson function when used in structural analysis. Thus, we may write the inverse and direct Fourier transforms as follows ... 

Both types of data analysis are equivalent because the spectral power function Pj (oj) is a Fourier transform of the corresponding autocorrelation function (Wiener-Khintchine-theorem Wiener 1930 Khintchine 1934). In the following, only PCS will be discussed. 

On-line estimation of the second-order statistics of a speech signal from a sample function of the noisy signal has proven to be a better choice. Since the analysis frame length is usually relatively small, the covariance matrices of the speech signal maybe assumed Toeplitz. Thus, the autocorrelation function of the clean signal in each analysis frame must be estimated. The Fourier transform of a windowed autocorrelation function estimate provides estimates of the variances of the clean signal spectral components. 

The methods used for expressing the data fall into two categories, time domain techniques and frequency domain techniques. The two methods are related because frequency and time are the reciprocals of each other. The analysis technique influences the data requirements. Reference 9 provides a brief overview of the various mathematical methods and a multitude of additional references. Specialized transforms (Fourier) can be used to transfer information between the two domains. Time domain measures include the normal statistical measures such as mean, variance, third moment, skewness, fourth moment, kurto-sis, standard deviation, coefficient of variance, and root mean squEire eis well as an additional parameter, the ratio of the standard deviation to the root mean square vtJue of the current (when measuring current noise) used in place of the coefficient of variance because the mean could be zero. An additional time domain measure that can describe the degree of randonmess is the autocorrelation function of the voltage or current signal. The main frequency domain... 

The rapid fluctuations of phE during the fracture of many materials suggest that deterministic chaos is a feature of the phE process. The autocorrelation function and conditional probability distributions are consistent with this initial impression. Fourier transform and fractal box dimension analyses show the phE to be fractal in nature, which is quite suggestive of chaos. The strongest evidence for chaos results from an analysis of the correlation dimension of the attractor associated with the epoxy data. A clearly nonintegral dimension of about 3.2 is found. 

The approximate QD pump probe signal (Fig. 3.47) still yields a good agreement with the experimental and the exact QD theoretical results. The 320 fs oscillation structure dominates in all cases. Moreover, one of the slower pseudorotational vibrations with a period of about 1 ps can also be detected by our approximate QD method. A detailed analysis by means of the Fourier transform of the corresponding autocorrelation function [378] and of the induced wave packet dynamics reveals that this oscillation is caused by a slow pseudorotational vibration in the coordinate (f. As the Fourier spectrum shows the wave packet prepared in the B state is centered around 621 nm, i.e. between the vibrational states = 5 and 6 of the (f mode. The energy distance between these two eigenstates corresponds to a vibrational period of about 1 ps. It is one of the fastest pseudorotational vibrations which can be observed in the absorption spectrum and is the next slower vibration after the Qs mode. This interpretation of the 1 ps oscillation is confirmed by analyzing the induced wave packet dynamics. Here, an accumulation of the... 

---