Heterogeneous fluidization

Solving the problem on the interaction of a solid particle, drop, or bubble with the surrounding continuous phase underlies the design and analysis of many technological processes. The industrial applications of such interaction include classification of suspensions in hydrocyclones, sedimentation of colloids, pneumatic conveyers, fluidization, heterogeneous catalysis in suspension, dissolving solid particles, extraction from drops, absorption, and evaporation into bubbles [69, 107, 111, 122,137,478,505],... 

Heterogeneous vapor-phase fluorination of a chlorocarbon or chlorohydrocarbon with HP over a supported metal catalyst is an alternative to the hquid phase process. Salts of chromium, nickel, cobalt or iron on an A1P. support are considered viable catalysts in pellet or fluidized powder form. This process can be used to manufacture CPC-11 and CPC-12, but is hampered by the formation of over-fluorinated by-products with Httle to no commercial value. The most effective appHcation for vapor-phase fluorination is where all the halogens are to be replaced by fluorine, as in manufacture of 3,3,3-trifluoropropene [677-21 ] (14) for use in polyfluorosiHcones. 

Heterogeneous hydrogenation catalysts can be used in either a supported or an unsupported form. The most common supports are based on alurnina, carbon, and siUca. Supports are usually used with the more expensive metals and serve several purposes. Most importandy, they increase the efficiency of the catalyst based on the weight of metal used and they aid in the recovery of the catalyst, both of which help to keep costs low. When supported catalysts are employed, they can be used as a fixed bed or as a slurry (Uquid phase) or a fluidized bed (vapor phase). In a fixed-bed process, the amine or amine solution flows over the immobile catalyst. This eliminates the need for an elaborate catalyst recovery system and minimizes catalyst loss. When a slurry or fluidized bed is used, the catalyst must be separated from the amine by gravity (settling), filtration, or other means. 

The fluidized bed in Figure 4-10 is anotlier eommon type of eatalytie reaetor. The fluidized bed is analogous to the CFSTR in that its eontents though heterogeneous are well mixed, resulting in an even temperature distribution throughout the bed. 

Heterogeneous catalysts can be divided into two types those for use in fixed-bed processing wherein the catalyst is stationary and the reactants pass upward (flooded-bed) or downward (trickle-bed) over it, and those for use it slurry or fluidized-bed processing. Fixed-bed catalysts are relatively large particles, I/32 to 1 /4 inch, in the form of cylinders, spheres, or granules. Slurry or fluidized-bed catalysts are fine powders, which can be suspended readily in a liquid or gas, respectively. Fixed-bed processing is especially suited to large-scale production, and many important bulk chemicals are made in this mode. 

In any catalyst selection procedure the first step will be the search for an active phase, be it a. solid or complexes in a. solution. For heterogeneous catalysis the. second step is also deeisive for the success of process development the choice of the optimal particle morphology. The choice of catalyst morphology (size, shape, porous texture, activity distribution, etc.) depends on intrinsic reaction kinetics as well as on diffusion rates of reactants and products. The catalyst cannot be cho.sen independently of the reactor type, because different reactor types place different demands on the catalyst. For instance, fixed-bed reactors require relatively large particles to minimize the pressure drop, while in fluidized-bed reactors relatively small particles must be used. However, an optimal choice is possible within the limits set by the reactor type. 

Typically it took about 160 to 200 seconds to inject a pulse of about 455 kg coarse tracer particles into the bed pneumatically from the coaxial solid feed tube. It can be clearly seen from Figs. 38 to 42 that the tracer particle concentration increases from essentially zero to a final equilibrium value, depending on the location of the sampling port. The steady state was usually reached within about 5 minutes. There is considerable scatter in the data in some cases. This is to be expected because the tracer concentration to be detected is small, on the order of 4%, and absolute uniformity of mixing inside a heterogeneous fluidized bed is difficult to obtain. 

Special attention has to be paid to a definition of attrition rates in the case of continuous processes where fresh solid material is continuously added. This is particularly the case in heterogeneously catalyzed fluidized bed processes where fresh make-up catalyst must be added to compensate for attrition losses. The fresh catalyst may contain elutriable fines which add to the measurable elutriation rate thus leading to an apparently higher attrition rate. 

Heterogeneous catalytic gas-phase reactions are most important in industrial processes, especially in petrochemistry and related fields, in which most petrochemical and chemical products are manufactured by this method. These reactions are currently being studied in many laboratories, and the results of this research can be also used for synthetic purposes. The reactions are usually performed [61] in a continuous system on a fixed catalyst bed (exceptionally a fluidized bed). 

Heterogeneous reactions are typically performed in solid and liquid phase reaetors typically fixed bed and fluidized bed reactors (Figure 1) and wall reaetors (Figure 2) wherein the contact time and the ratio of solid/liquid phase are different and ean be moderated. 

In considering heat transfer in gas-solid fluidization it is important to distinguish between, on the one hand, heat transfer between the bed and a heat transfer surface (be it heated bed walls or heat transfer coils in the bed) and, on the other hand, heat transfer between particles and the fluidizing gas. Much of the fluidization literature is concerned with the former because of its relevance to the use of fluidized beds as heterogeneous chemical reactors. Gas-particle heat transfer is rather more relevant to the food processing applications of fluidization such as drying, where the transfer of heat from the inlet gas to the wet food particle is crucial. 

Heterogeneous fluidization Homogeneous fluidization Incipient fluidization Lean phase Minimum fluidization... 

There are many ways that two phases can be contacted, and for each the design equation will be unique. Design equations for these ideal flow patterns may be developed without too much difficulty. However, when real flow deviates considerably from these, we can do one of two things we may develop models to mirror actual flow closely, or we may calculate performance with ideal patterns which bracket actual flow. Fortunately, most real reactors for heterogeneous systems can be satisfactorily approximated by one of the five ideal flow patterns of Fig. 17.1. Notable exceptions are the reactions which take place in fluidized beds. There special models must be developed. 

The foregoing methods are certainly not exclusive, and many other techniques such as cloud chambers (e.g., see Miller et al., 1987) and fluidized bed reactors have also been applied to following the kinetics of heterogeneous reactions relevant to the atmosphere. However, due to space limitations, these will not be treated in detail here. 

The classic analysis of reactors involves two idealized flow patterns— plug flow and mixed flow. Though real reactors never fully follow these flow patterns, in many cases, a number of designs approximate these ideals with negligible error. However, deviation from ideality can be considerable. Typically, in a reaction vessel, we can have several immediate cases closer to plug or mixed flow. Of course, nonideal flow concerns all types of reactors used in heterogeneous processes, i.e. fixed beds, fluidized beds, continuous-flow tank reactors, and batch reactors. However, we will focus on fixed beds and batch reactors, which are the common cases. 

---