Fluid Dynamics During Spinning

The absolute values of the interfacial tensions varied between different amphi-philes and solvents (Table 1). AOT, which is well known in the literature for the formation of microemulsions, showed the lowest surface tension at the interface of both solvents. The other nonionic snrfactants mentioned here. Span 80 and Brij 72 showed shghtly higher valnes. This was also observed for Lecithine, but this lipid precipitated partly during the spinning-drop measurements. Due to this phenomenon, it was not possible to measure accurate data for this emulsifying compound. The interfacial tension had also some influence on the mean size of the emulsion droplets and on the stability of the vesicles (Table 3). In addition to the stationary values of the surface tension, dynamic processes as the surfactant diffusion represented another important factor for the process of stimulated vesicle formation. If an aqueous droplet passed across the fluid interface it carried-over a thin layer of emulsifiers and thereby lowered the local surfactant concentration in the vicinity of the oil-water interface. In the short time span, before the next water droplet approached the interface, the surfactant films should entirely reform and this only occurred, if the surfactant diffusion was fast enough. 

---