Fluctuations in ion current

The use of low flow rates introduces two further practical problems. The first is the inability to maintain stable conditions at the end of the probe, hence resulting in fluctuations in ion current, as experienced when droplets are formed on the moving belt. As the liquid emerges onto the probe tip, it experiences the high vacuum and begins to evaporate, with a consequent reduction in the temperature of the probe tip. Sufficient heat must therefore be applied to prevent freezing of the mobile phase and this helps stabilize ion production. 

A second problem in whole molecule mass spectrometry is that fluctuations in ion current may introduce substantial errors. Recall that ions of different m/z are not measured simultaneously in whole molecule mass spectrometry. If the ion current is not stable (and it commonly fluctuates in El sources), then after first peak (say m/z = 112 in our example) is measured, and instrumental parameters are changed in order to focus the next peak (m/z = 114) on the collector, the ion current of this second peak may no longer correspond to that existing at the time the first peak was measured. One can try to switch the detector from peak to peak more rapidly but that shortens the collection time for each peak, fewer ions will be counted, and errors in counting statistics will increase. Normally this problem is dealt with by statistical... 

Fluctuations in ion current may occur for certain "difficult" molecules, typically salts or other highly polar organics. However, this is not a problem for organics that yield reasonable FI/FD signal intensities. 

Note that the traces are somewhat ragged (individual spectra have different intensities due to fluctuations in spray quality). Addition of trifluoroacetic acid caused a huge boost in ion current at 30 s, due to its ability to protonate neutrals to form [M + H]+ ions (as well as catalyze the hydrolysis)—the ion count per data point jumped from 3000 to a momentary value of 48,000 (Fig. 3 shows only 0-15,000 counts, to keep the rest of the data on scale). To smooth out these fluctuations and to focus in on the relative abundances of the ions of interest, we normalized the data to the total intensity of the three key ions (Fig. 4) the product traces disregard the other product, to take account of the different ionization efficiencies of these two ions. 

Ion thermoemission (IT) resembles the FEM fluctuation method except that fluctuations in the current due to thermally desorbing ions are monitored [88Glal], Only species that naturally desorb as ions may be studied. 

Colquhoun, D. and Sakmann, B., Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels, Nature, 294, 464-466, 1981. (The full version of this paper can be found in J. Physiol., 369, 501-557, 1985.)... 

After passing through the magnetic field, the separated ions are collected in ion detectors, where the input is converted into an electrical impulse, which is then fed into an amplifier. The use of multiple detectors to simultaneously integrate the ion currents was introduced by Nier et al. (1947). The advantage of the simultaneous measurement with two separate amplifiers is that relative fluctuations of the ion currents as a function of time are the same for all m/e beams. Each detector channel is fitted with a high ohmic resistor appropriate for the mean natural abundance of the ion current of interest. 

By contrast, electrolyte states are much more limited in their distribution than metal conduction band states so that in many cases electron transfer through surface states may be the dominant process in semiconductor-electrolyte junctions. On the other hand, in contrast to vacuum and insulators, liquid electrolytes allow substantial interaction at the interface. Ionic currents flow, adsorption and desorption take place, solvent molecules fluctuate around ions and reactants and products diffuse to and from the surface. The reactions and kinetics of these processes must be considered in analyzing the behavior of surface states at the semiconductor-electrolyte junction. Thus, at the semiconductor-electrolyte junction, surface states can interact strongly with the electrolyte but from the point of view of the semiconductor the reaction of surface states with the semiconductor carriers should still be describable by equations 1 and 2. 

A parallel development came from studies on artificial lipid bilayer membranes. Hladky and Hay don (1984) found that when very small amounts of the antibiotic gramicidin were introduced into such a membrane, its conductance to electrical current flow fluctuated in a stepwise fashion. It looked as though each gramicidin molecule contained an aqueous pore that would permit the flow of monovalent cations through it. Could the ion channels of natural cell membranes act in a similar way To answer this question, it was first necessary to solve the difficult technical problem of how to record the tiny currents that must pass through single channels. 

Both formulations stumble when the materials are real conductors such as salt solutions or metals. In these cases important fluctuations can occur in the limit of low frequency where we must think of long-lasting, far-reaching electric currents. Unlike brief dipolar fluctuations that can be considered to occur local to a point in a material, walls or discontinuities in conductivity at material interfaces interrupt the electrical currents set up by these longer-lasting "zero-frequency" fields. It is not enough to know finite bulk material conductivities in order to compute forces. Nevertheless, it is possible to extend the Lifshitz theory to include events such as the fluctuations of ions in salt solutions or of electrons in metals. 

Golquhoun, D.. and Sakmann, B, 1981. Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels. Nature 294 464—466. 

---