Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Flow models calibration process

A better alternative is often to divide the variables into conceptually meaningful blocks, and then apply hierarchical multi-block PLS (or PC) models. In QSAR the blocks may correspond to different regions of the modeled molecules and different types of variable (size descriptors, polarity descriptors, etc.), and in multivariate calibration the blocks may correspond to different spectral regions. In process modeling, the process usually has a number of different steps (e.g., raw material, reactor, precipitation step), and variables measured on these different steps constitute natural blocks. These may be divided further according to the type of variables (e.g., temperatures, flows, pressures, concentrations). [Pg.2018]

For a new process plant, calculations can be carried out using the heat release and plume flow rate equations outlined in Table 13.16 from a paper by Bender. For the theory to he valid, the hood must he more than two source diameters (or widths for line sources) above the source, and the temperature difference must be less than 110 °C. Experimental results have also been obtained for the case of hood plume eccentricity. These results account for cross drafts which occur within most industrial buildings. The physical and chemical characteristics of the fume and the fume loadings are obtained from published or available data of similar installations or established through laboratory or pilot-plant scale tests. - If exhaust volume requirements must he established accurately, small scale modeling can he used to augment and calibrate the analytical approach. [Pg.1269]

For aerobic gravity sewers, procedure 4 is the ultimate calibration of the sewer process model. This is based on procedures 1 to 3 using information from upstream and downstream wastewater samples and by including local sewer systems and flow characteristics, temperature and DO concentration values of the wastewater in the sewer. Example 7.2 outlines the results of calibration and validation performed on a 5 km intercepting sewer line. [Pg.192]

Focusing on the carbon flow in wastewater under anaerobic conditions, the corresponding process parameters shown in Figure 6.9 are based on utilization of results from the three mentioned procedures and a calibration of the aerobic-anaerobic sewer process model shown in Table 6.6. [Pg.200]

A model for crystallization point of the urea melt sprayed into the granulator was developed based on acoustic spectra recorded from sensor position A during a trial period of 24 hours. A flow sheet of the liquid urea feed process can be seen in Figure 9.7. Sensor A is mounted onto an orifice plate inserted in the main supply pipeline of liquid urea (see Figures 9.6 and 9.7). The reference values used to calibrate the model are the crystallization temperature (called the jc point ), as determined by the pilot plant laboratory (heat table visual nucleation/crystallization detection). [Pg.287]

The Charlotte mill (Chemicolloid Corp.) also employs high speed of rotation with the fluid flowing between a grooved conical rotor and a corresponding grooved conical stator. Clearance between them is regulated by an external calibrated adjustment device. Laboratoiy model W-10 operates at 0.75 kW (1 hp) with a capacity of 4 to 190 L/li (1 to 50 gal/h). Sanitary models are available for processing foodstuffs. [Pg.1623]

Broadly speaking, there are three main processes to be modeled in the computation of emission in these flows (1) fluid mechanics (2) chemistry and (3) radiation. The rarefied fluid mechanics should be accurately simulated since both continuum and DSMC methods have been applied and cross checked for consistency. For radiation, the NEQAIR code has been improved and calibrated extensively through comparison with the BSUV data (from both flights 1 and 2) and through comparison with laboratory data. Nevertheless, there remains some uncertainty in the model, particularly as the degree of nonequilibrium increases at high altitude. The degree of uncertainty of the radiation model is estimated to be at least a factor of 2. [Pg.124]


See other pages where Flow models calibration process is mentioned: [Pg.435]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.1211]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.2167]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.1780]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.44]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.398 ]




SEARCH



Process flow

Process flow processing

© 2024 chempedia.info