Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Flexible-input generalization

it follows from the analysis of the preceding section that a general agreement of IT descriptors with the intuitive chemical estimates follows only when each externally decoupled fragment of a molecule exhibits the separate unit normalization of its input probabilities this requirement expresses its externally closed status relative to the molecular remainder. It modifies the overall norm of the molecular input to the number of such mutually closed, noncommunicating fragments of the whole molecular system. This requirement was hitherto missing in all previous applications of CTCB and OCT to polyatomic systems. [Pg.15]

Roman F. Nalewajski, Dariusz Szczepanik, and Janusz Mrozek [Pg.16]

In the generalized approach the probabilities p°a = [// j of the constituent inputs in the given externally decoupled (noncommunicating and non-bonded) subchannel a0 of the system promolecular reference M° = (a° j8°. ..) should thus exhibit the internal (intrasubsystem) normalization, Pa = we have denoted the externally closed status of each fragment in M° by separating it with the vertical solid lines from the rest of the molecule. Therefore, these subsystem probabilities are, in fact, conditional in character p = P(a a) = pa/Pa, calculated per unit input probability Pa = 1 of the whole subsystem a in the collection of the mutually nonbonded subsystems in the reference M°, that is, when this molecular fragment is not considered to be a part of a larger system. Indeed, the above summation over the internal orbital events then expresses the normalization of all such conditional probabilities in the separate (or isolated) subsystem a0 P(a a) = 1. [Pg.16]

In the previous, fixed-input determination of the IT bond indices this discontinuity in the transition from the decoupled to the coupled descriptions of the molecular fragments prevents an interpretation of the former as the limiting case of the latter, when all external communications of the subsystem in question become infinitely small. In other words, the fixed-and flexible-input approaches generate the mutually exclusive sets of bond indices, which cannot describe this transition in a continuous ( causal ) fashion. As we have demonstrated in the decoupled approach of the preceding section, only the overall input normalization equal to the number of the decoupled orbital subsystems gives rise to the full agreement with the accepted chemical intuition. [Pg.16]

Therefore, in this section we shall attempt to remove this discontinuity in the unifying, flexible-input generalization of the use of the molecular information systems. We shall demonstrate that in such an extension the above limiting transition in the communication description of the subsystem [Pg.16]


Scheme 1.2 The flexible-input generalization of the two-AO channel of Scheme 1.1a for the promolecular reference distribution p° = (1/2,1/2). The corresponding partial and average entropy/information descriptors of the chemical bond are also reported. Scheme 1.2 The flexible-input generalization of the two-AO channel of Scheme 1.1a for the promolecular reference distribution p° = (1/2,1/2). The corresponding partial and average entropy/information descriptors of the chemical bond are also reported.
Figure 4.6 shows a more flexible and general model of modal synthesis. This model allows for the filter input to be arbitrary, rather than just an impulse. It also allows for that input to be processed through a simple brightness... [Pg.47]

A contactor equipped with an impeller is generally considered to be the most flexible and most generally effective gas disperser known. A porous sparger has no advantage except at very low power inputs. [Pg.296]

The examples outlined above are intended to show the utility of a generalized computer model for polymer processing problems. Such a model is able to adapt itself to a wide variety of situations simply by adjustments to the input dataset, rather than requiring alterations to the code itself. This flexibility makes the code somewhat more difficult to learn initially, but this might be minimized by embedding the finite-element code itself in a more "user-friendly" graphics-oriented shell. [Pg.280]

A general method has been developed for the estimation of model parameters from experimental observations when the model relating the parameters and input variables to the output responses is a Monte Carlo simulation. The method provides point estimates as well as joint probability regions of the parameters. In comparison to methods based on analytical models, this approach can prove to be more flexible and gives the investigator a more quantitative insight into the effects of parameter values on the model. The parameter estimation technique has been applied to three examples in polymer science, all of which concern sequence distributions in polymer chains. The first is the estimation of binary reactivity ratios for the terminal or Mayo-Lewis copolymerization model from both composition and sequence distribution data. Next a procedure for discriminating between the penultimate and the terminal copolymerization models on the basis of sequence distribution data is described. Finally, the estimation of a parameter required to model the epimerization of isotactic polystyrene is discussed. [Pg.282]

A complication arising from the extension of the theory to flexible macromolecules is that in general, the intermolecular and intramolecular radial distribution functions depend on each other.In modeling the bulk of a one-phase polymer melt, however, the situation resolves itself because the excluded volume effect is insignificant under these conditions the polymer chains assume unperturbed dimensions (see also the section on Monte Carlo simulations by Corradini, as described originally in Ref. 99). One may therefore calculate the structure of the unperturbed single chain and employ the result as input to the PRISM theory to calculate the intermolecular correlation functions in the melt. [Pg.198]

Fig. 1 Theoretical proposed representation of the signal to noise in the cortical networks as affected by propranolol, based upon the findings of Hasselmo et al (1997) on the effects of norepinephrine in the cortex. Black arrows indicate a greater response to the most dominant signal input, such as representation of an attended stimulus, which may be suppressed by noradrenergic blockade. White arrows indicate the response to nondominant signal input, such as intrinsic or associative fiber inputs, the noise in the model, which may increase with noradrenergic blockade, proposed to be how problems without an immediately accessible answer may be solved more readily in this condition or how patients with impaired flexibility of network access may benefit in a more general manner in this condition. Fig. 1 Theoretical proposed representation of the signal to noise in the cortical networks as affected by propranolol, based upon the findings of Hasselmo et al (1997) on the effects of norepinephrine in the cortex. Black arrows indicate a greater response to the most dominant signal input, such as representation of an attended stimulus, which may be suppressed by noradrenergic blockade. White arrows indicate the response to nondominant signal input, such as intrinsic or associative fiber inputs, the noise in the model, which may increase with noradrenergic blockade, proposed to be how problems without an immediately accessible answer may be solved more readily in this condition or how patients with impaired flexibility of network access may benefit in a more general manner in this condition.
Dynamic simulation is more demanding as its steady state counterpart. Firstly, it needs much more sizing elements. Then, the pressure variation cannot be neglected or lumped in the specification of simulation unit. However, in general the specification of variables is more flexible. Any flowsheet variable could be set as, irrespective if this regards input or output streams, or internal unit variables (see later in Chapter 3). [Pg.49]


See other pages where Flexible-input generalization is mentioned: [Pg.15]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.2039]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.947]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.864]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.952]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.272]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.15 , Pg.16 , Pg.17 , Pg.18 , Pg.19 , Pg.20 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info